Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: malay singh · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.019 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 07 2005

Samir Ganguly Vs. Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau, Easte ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-07-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 36, 36A, 36A(1), 36C, 36D(1) and 366A(1); ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act, 1988; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 3 and 244 to 247

Reported in : 2005CriLJ3276

Advocate for Respondent : Malay Singh and ;Saibal Mondal, Advs.

ORDERAsit Kuamr Bisi, J.1. The instant revision application arises out of the order dated 7th August, 2003 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 2nd Court, Hooghly in N.D.P.S. Case No. 7 of 2002.2. The facts...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 15 2004

Nikhil Kumar Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-15-2004

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Section 3(1), 3(A) and 3A(5); ;Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Section 3

Reported in : 2005(187)ELT6(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Malay Singh, Adv.

Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.1. The Court : By this application the writ petitioner has asked for refund of a sum of Rs. 2,05,178/- being the amount of special additional duty under the provision of decision 3A(5)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 2010

Kasem Babu Mondal Vs. the State of West Bengal and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-07-2010

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 21, 29, 41, 42, 42(2), 43, 50, 50(3), 51, 54 and 67; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 21, 24 to 27, 103 and 114; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 4, 100, 161, 165 and 313; ;Constitution of India - Article 20(3)

Advocate for Respondent : Asimesh Goswami,; Pranati Goswami and; J.N. Chatterjee

S.P. Talukdar, J.1. This is directed against the judgment dated 11th July, 2007 and the order dated 12th July, 2007 passed by learned 6th Court of Additional District and Sessions Judge, Barasat, North 24-Parganas in N.D.P.S....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 08 2014

Wrinkle Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Roselabs Bioscience Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-08-2014

Subject : Miscellaneous

ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction G.A.No.1106 of 2014 C.S.No.120 of 2014 With G.A.No.1107 of 2014 C.S.No.119 of 2014 Wrinkle Marketing PVT.LTD.Vs Roselabs Bioscience LTD.With G.A.No.1111 of 2014 C.S.No.121 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 1987

Advertising Consultant (i) Ltd. Vs. Mamraj Saraf and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-06-1987

Subject : CivilTenancy

Acts : Presidency Small Causes Courts Act, 1882 - Section 17, 18, 41, 50, 53, 54 and 60

Reported in : (1987)0CALLT321(HC),92CWN13

Advocate for Respondent : Sudhis Dasgupta, ;S.N. Mukherjee, ;Tarun Chatterjee and ;Malay Singh, Advs.

Chittatosh Mookerjee, C.J.1. The petitioner company is admittedly a tenant under the opposite parties in respect of a portion of premises No. 63, Rafi Ahmed Kidwai Road, Calcutta, at a rent of Rs. 21 thousand per...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 2005

Surajmal Baijnath Indus. P. Ltd. Vs. Pasupati Agro Chem Nepal P. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-01-2005

Subject : Customs

Acts : Major Port Trust Act, 1963 - Sections 53, 53(1), 61, 61(1), 61(2), 61(3), 62, 62(1), 62(2) and 62(3); ;Customs Act - Section 48; ;Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 2(14), 20, 64, 64(3), 64(4), 64(5) and 64(6)

Reported in : (2006)1CALLT328(HC),2005(190)ELT161(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Rajat Kumar Ghosh, Sr. Adv., ;S.K. Roy Chowdhury, ;Sudhir Kumar Mehata, ;A.K. Jena and ;Malay Singh, Advs.

ORDERDilip Kumar Seth, J. The questions :1. In this appeal in course of hearing three points emerged. The first point that emerged was whether the absence of individual notice to the owner of the goods in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 2003

Rash Mohan Saha Vs. Narcotic Control Bureau, Eastern Zonal Unit

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-07-2003

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 50

Reported in : 2004(4)CHN80

Advocate for Respondent : Balai Chandra Roy, Id. Adv. General and ;Ashim Kumar Roy, Amicus Curiae, ;Malay Singh and; Tirthankar Ghosh, Advs.

Amit Talukdar, J. 1. Pursuant to a petition of complaint (Ext. 2) lodged by P.W. 2, Sankar Das Sinha the appellant hereinabove was arrayed before the learned Judge, Special Court (under the NDPS Act), Barasat 24-Parganas...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial