Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: madhusudan narain · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.023 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 23 1960

Pukhraj Vs. Sheshmal

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-23-1960

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 173, 195 and 476; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 211

Reported in : AIR1961Raj231; 1961CriLJ691

Advocate for Respondent : Madhusudan Narain, Adv. for; Pukhraj, Adv.

ORDERL.N. Chhangani, J. 1. The Additional District Magistrate, Jodhpur has made this reference with a recommendation that the offence under Section 211 I. P. C. for which Parasmal is being prosecuted having been committed in relation...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 1952

The State Vs. Gajraj

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-06-1952

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 154, 252, 256 and 286; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 33

Reported in : AIR1953Raj66

Advocate for Respondent : Madhusudan Narain, Adv.

Wanchoo, C.J.1. This is an appeal by the State against the acquittal of Gajraj accused by the Sub-divisional Magistrate of Jodhpur.2. The case relates to an incident which took place on the night between the 24th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 1958

Sumermal and ors. Vs. Birdhichand and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-29-1958

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 4 to 25 and 30; Rajasthan by Part B States Laws Act, 1951; Marwar Limitation Act, 1945 - Sections 4; Marwar Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1949 - Sections 4; Rajasthan Limitation Act (Adaptation) Ordinance, 1950 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR1958Raj318

Advocate for Respondent : Hukumchand, Adv. in No. 313 and; Madhusudan Narain, Adv. for Non-Applicant No. 1 in No. 40

K.N. Wanchoo, C.J. 1. These two cases have been referred by a learned Single Judge to a Division Bench for decision as an important question of law which is common to both of them arises therein....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial