Advanced Search Results

Sukhai S/O Late Shri Sevaki Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through Secretar ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Reported in : [2005(106)FLR1154]

Advocate for Respondent : K.C. Sinha, S.S.C. and ;Madhur Prakash, Adv.

Vineet Saran, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Madhur Prakash, learned counsel appearing for the contesting respondent Nos. 2 to 5 and have perused the record.2. The petitioner was initially appointed...

Om Prakash Vs. Ist Addl. District Judge, Ballia and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ConstitutionElection

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 12C, 12C(1) and 12C(6); Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Settlement of Disputes) Rules, 1994 - Rule 4(3); Constitution of India, Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115

Reported in : 1999(2)AWC1628

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. and;Madhur Prakash, Adv.

G.P. Mathur, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitutionhas been field for quashing the orders dated 24.6.1997 passed by the prescribed authority and 7.3.1998 passed by the Addl. District Judge, Ballia.2. The dispute relates...

Jagdish Prasad Saxena Vs. Additional District Judge, Agra and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 12, 14, 21 and 21(1), (2), (3), (3A) and (3B); Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) (Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : 1999(2)AWC1519

Advocate for Respondent : Madhur Prakash, Adv.

Shitla Pd. Srivastava, J.1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the order dated 18.5.1983 passed by the Rent Control and Eviction Officer, Agra...

New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Janardan Mishra and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 174

Reported in : III(2004)ACC468; 2005(1)AWC750

Advocate for Respondent : Madhur Prakash, Adv.

Tarun Agarwala, J. 1. The respondent's son had died in an accident and accordingly, he moved an application for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act. During the pendency of the proceedings the matter was taken up...

Narendra Singh Vs. Bhartendra Singh and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC719

Advocate for Respondent : N.S. Chaudhary and ;P.K. Saxena, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J. 1. In a suit for declaration of title on the basis of registered deed for partition dated 23rd March. 1974 stated to have been acted upon between the parties, the defendant Nos. 1,...

P.R. Transport Agency Through Its Partner Sri Prabhakar Singh Vs. Unio ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act - Sections 16(1); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 13(3); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 20 - Order 41 Rule 27(1) - Order 47 Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226

Reported in : AIR2006All23; 2006(1)AWC504

Advocate for Respondent : K.C. Sinha and ;Madhur Prakash, Advs.

Sushil Harkauli and Umeshwar Pandey, JJ.1. We have heard Sri Manish Goyal for the petitioner and Sri Madhur Prakash representing respondents No. 2 and 3 at length.2. During the course of hearing Sri Madhur Prakash raised...

State of U.P. Vs. Daroga

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307 and 452; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2005CriLJ4547

M. Chaudhary, J.1. This Government appeal has been filed on behalf of State of U. P. from the judgment and order dated 14th of December, 1981 passed by Sessions Judge Basti in Sessions Trial No. 14...

Janpad Int. Bhatta Samiti and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. Madhur Prakash

1. These two modification applications have been filed by respondent No. 5 and respondent No. 3 respectively making substantially following prayers:(i) It is, therefore Most Respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble High Court may graciously be pleased...

Nand Kishor Vs. Collector. District Magistrate, Rampur and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. We have heard Shri Madhur Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel appears for the respondents. Shri Satendra Kumar Pandey appears for Nagar Palika Parishad, Rampur. 2. In these writ petitions the petitioners...

Rahul Industries Vs. Union of India

Court : Allahabad

Subject : MRTP

1. Since common question of facts and law are involved in all the writ petitions, therefore they are being heard and decided by common order. 2. By means of present bunch of writ petitions, the petitioners...