Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: m venkatraman · Page 1 of about 18 results (0.033 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 22 2005

A.B. Controls Ltd Verusdirector of Enforcement

Court : Appellate Tribunal for foreign Exchange New Delhi

Decided on : Nov-22-2005

Subject : MRTP

1. This is an appeal against Adjudication Order No. DE (R) III/19-26/92, dated 16-9-1992 passed by Special Director, Enforcement Directorate imposing a penalty of Rs. 2,50,000 on the appellant for failure to utilize a part of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 2002

Cce Vs. Sundaram Industries Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Nov-07-2002

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2003)(86)ECC238

1. This appeal filed by the revenue is directed against the Order-in-Original No. 8/97 dt. 19.2.97, by which the Ld. Commissioner has dropped the proceedings regarding the demand of duty of including the notional interest on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 2002

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Jkon Engg. (P) Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Nov-14-2002

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2003)(151)ELT453Tri(Chennai)

1. The appeal by the Revenue and a cross appeal by the assessee both arises from the Order-in-Appeal No. 61/2002, dt. 27-3-2002. Before the Commissioner the only question raised by the assessee was with regard to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 07 2004

Vinod Arora Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Oct-07-2004

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)(179)ELT353TriDel

1. The issue involved in this appeal, filed Sh. Vinod Arora, is whether the goods seized from his business premises are liable to confiscation under the Customs Act.2. We heard Sh. M. Venkatraman, learned Advocate for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 01 1986

Collector of Customs and ors. Vs. Gopalkrishna Bros. and ors.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jul-01-1986

Subject : Education

Reported in : (1986)(9)ECC148

1. All these appeals relate to (a common issue and were, therefore, heard together. The relevant details in each appeal as to the name of the assessee, number of the order in appeal etc. are given...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 1987

Charu Apparel Mfg. Co. P. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-10-1987

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1989)(42)ELT78TriDel

1. Charu Apparel Manufacturing Company Pvt. Ltd. has filed an appeal being aggrieved from an order passed by Collector of Customs (Appeals), Bombay. The appellants are 100% export oriented unit and had purchased one Barudan Embroidery...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 04 1987

Rattan Singh and Sons Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Nov-04-1987

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1988)LC617Tri(Delhi)

1. On 14-12-1979, M/s. A.T. Travels, Clearing Agents, filed shipping bill for shipment of two packages through the Lufthansa Airlines. The exporter shown in the shipping bill was the appellants M/s. Rattan Singh and Sons. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 1997

K. Premkumar Vs. Rajangam

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-29-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 294, 323, 324, 332, 341 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 197 and 245

Reported in : 1997CriLJ3288

Advocate for Respondent : M. Venkatraman, Adv.

ORDER1. This revision filed by the petitioner who is the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Pandaloor Sub-Division, Nilgris is directed against the order in Cr. M.P. No. 3342 of 1995 in C.C. No. 224 of 1994 on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 2005

The Inspector of Police, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court Vs. Ram ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-30-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 109, 120, 302, 341 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2005(3)CTC626

Advocate for Respondent : M.Venkatraman, S.C. for ;V. Krishnakumar, Adv. for R1, ;P. Udayakumar, Adv. for R2 to R4, ;G. Damodaran, Adv. for R5 and ;S. Jayakumar, Addl. Public Prosecutor for R-6

M. Chockalingam, J.1. Crl. A. No. 980 of 1998 has been brought forth by the State aggrieved over the judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai, in S.C. No. 146 of 1997, wherein all the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2004

N. Suriyamuthu Vs. Management of T.i. Diamond ChaIn Ltd. and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-31-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2(1), 3, 4 and 4(1)

Reported in : 2006ACJ1205

Advocate for Respondent : Ravindran, Adv. for ;T.S. Gopalan & Co. and ;T.M. Venkatraman, Adv.

K. Govindarajan, J.1. The claimant before the Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Chennai filed the above appeals being not satisfied with the amount awarded as compensation both by the Deputy Commissioner of Labour and the learned Judge.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial