Advanced Search Results
A.B. Controls Ltd Verusdirector of Enforcement
Appellate Tribunal for foreign Exchange New Delhi
Nov-22-2005
MRTP
1. This is an appeal against Adjudication Order No. DE (R) III/19-26/92, dated 16-9-1992 passed by Special Director, Enforcement Directorate imposing a penalty of Rs. 2,50,000 on the appellant for failure to utilize a part of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce Vs. Sundaram Industries Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Nov-07-2002
Land Acquisition
(2003)(86)ECC238
1. This appeal filed by the revenue is directed against the Order-in-Original No. 8/97 dt. 19.2.97, by which the Ld. Commissioner has dropped the proceedings regarding the demand of duty of including the notional interest on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Jkon Engg. (P) Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Nov-14-2002
Excise
(2003)(151)ELT453Tri(Chennai)
1. The appeal by the Revenue and a cross appeal by the assessee both arises from the Order-in-Appeal No. 61/2002, dt. 27-3-2002. Before the Commissioner the only question raised by the assessee was with regard to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vinod Arora Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Oct-07-2004
Land Acquisition
(2005)(179)ELT353TriDel
1. The issue involved in this appeal, filed Sh. Vinod Arora, is whether the goods seized from his business premises are liable to confiscation under the Customs Act.2. We heard Sh. M. Venkatraman, learned Advocate for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of Customs and ors. Vs. Gopalkrishna Bros. and ors.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jul-01-1986
Education
(1986)(9)ECC148
1. All these appeals relate to (a common issue and were, therefore, heard together. The relevant details in each appeal as to the name of the assessee, number of the order in appeal etc. are given...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCharu Apparel Mfg. Co. P. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Sep-10-1987
Land Acquisition
(1989)(42)ELT78TriDel
1. Charu Apparel Manufacturing Company Pvt. Ltd. has filed an appeal being aggrieved from an order passed by Collector of Customs (Appeals), Bombay. The appellants are 100% export oriented unit and had purchased one Barudan Embroidery...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRattan Singh and Sons Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Nov-04-1987
Land Acquisition
(1988)LC617Tri(Delhi)
1. On 14-12-1979, M/s. A.T. Travels, Clearing Agents, filed shipping bill for shipment of two packages through the Lufthansa Airlines. The exporter shown in the shipping bill was the appellants M/s. Rattan Singh and Sons. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Premkumar Vs. Rajangam
Chennai
Apr-29-1997
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 294, 323, 324, 332, 341 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 197 and 245
1997CriLJ3288
M. Venkatraman, Adv.
ORDER1. This revision filed by the petitioner who is the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Pandaloor Sub-Division, Nilgris is directed against the order in Cr. M.P. No. 3342 of 1995 in C.C. No. 224 of 1994 on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Inspector of Police, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court Vs. Ram ...
Chennai
Jun-30-2005
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 109, 120, 302, 341 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313
2005(3)CTC626
M.Venkatraman, S.C. for ;V. Krishnakumar, Adv. for R1, ;P. Udayakumar, Adv. for R2 to R4, ;G. Damodaran, Adv. for R5 and ;S. Jayakumar, Addl. Public Prosecutor for R-6
M. Chockalingam, J.1. Crl. A. No. 980 of 1998 has been brought forth by the State aggrieved over the judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai, in S.C. No. 146 of 1997, wherein all the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN. Suriyamuthu Vs. Management of T.i. Diamond ChaIn Ltd. and ors.
Chennai
Mar-31-2004
Labour and Industrial
Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2(1), 3, 4 and 4(1)
2006ACJ1205
Ravindran, Adv. for ;T.S. Gopalan & Co. and ;T.M. Venkatraman, Adv.
K. Govindarajan, J.1. The claimant before the Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Chennai filed the above appeals being not satisfied with the amount awarded as compensation both by the Deputy Commissioner of Labour and the learned Judge.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »