Advanced Search Results

Dineshchandra Jamnadas Gandhi Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rules 23, 28 and 29; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 7, 16, 16(1)(A) and 19(2); Prevention of Food Adulteration (Amendment) Rules, 1984; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 432

Reported in : AIR1989SC1011; 1989CriLJ889; 1989(40)ELT230(SC); (1989)1GLR483; JT1989(1)SC83; (1989)95PLR364; 1989(1)SCALE92; (1989)1SCC420; [1989]1SCR138

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. M.V. Goswami

M.N. Venkatachaliah, J.1. By this petition for grant of Special Leave under Article 136 of the Constitution, coming up after notice to the State of Gujarat, the applicant seeks leave to appeal to this Court from...

Malkhan Singh Vs. Sohan Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , - Sections 11; Uttar Prade6h Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 12 and 52; Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Sections 49

Reported in : AIR1987SC500; (1985)4SCC469; [1985]Supp2SCR747; 1986(1)LC51(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : M.V. Goswami, Adv.

Acts/Rules/Orders: Civil Procedure Code (CPC), - Section 11; Uttar Prade6h Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 12 and 52; Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Section 49 Prior History: From the Judgment...

Brij Kishore Pandey Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1971)3SCC931b

M. Hidayatullah, C.J.1. The appellant, Brij Kishore Pandey, appeals to this Court by special leave which has been limited to the question of sentence of death imposed on him by the sessions Judge, Moradabad and confirmed...

Sitaram Motilal Kalal Vs. Santanuprasad Jaishankar Bhatt

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 96(1); Indian Railways Act - Sections 108; Motor Vehicles Act, 1914 - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR1966SC1697; 1966MhLJ881(SC); [1966]3SCR527

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Pershad

Subba Rao, J. 1. I regret my inability to agree. Sitaram Motilal Kalal, hereinafter called the 1st defendant is in agriculturist having lands at Kathwada village. He owned a motor-car bearing registration No. BYD 316. He...

Pathan Murtazakhan Dadamkhan and Others Vs. Pathan Pirkhan Amdumiyan ( ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Bombay Tenancy Act, 1939 - Sections 2A and 48

Reported in : AIR1993SC1750; II(1993)BC580(SC); JT1993(3)SC615; 1993(2)SCALE399; 1993Supp(2)SCC518; [1993]2SCR578

1. This appeal under Article 136 is against the judgment of the High Court of Gujarat in Second Appeal No. 98 of 1973 dated August 6, 1973. The appellants' predecessor was inducted in Field Nos. 439...

Mahabir Kishore and Others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ContractLimitation

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 72; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 7(2), 9(3), 17(1) and 23 - Schedule - Articles 24 and 96; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Article 226; Sales Tax Act; Assam Taxation (on Goods Carried by Road or Inland Wateways) Act, 1954; Specific Relief Acts, 1963; Central Excise Act, 1944

Reported in : AIR1990SC313; 1989(24)ECC199; 1989(43)ELT205(SC); [1990]184ITR548(SC); (1989)4SCC1; [1989]3SCR596; 1989(2)LC576(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : U.A. Rana and ; S.K. Agnihotri, Advs.

ORDERS.N. Saikia, J.1. This plaintiffs' appeal by special leave is from the appellate Judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissing the appeal upholding the Judgment of the trial court dismissing the plaintiffs' suit on the...

Mahabir Kishore and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ContractLimitation

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 72; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 17, 17(1) - Schedule - Articles 24 and 113; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80

Reported in : [1990]69CompCas16(SC); JT1989(3)SC327; (1989)4SCC1a

K.N. Saikia, J.1. This plaintiffs' appeal by special leave is from the appellate Judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissing the appeal upholding the Judgment of the trial court dismissing the plaintiffs' suit on the...

Bharat Iron Works Vs. Bhagubhai Balubhai Patel and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10, 33, 33(2) and 33(3); Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226; Indian Trade Unions (Amendment) Act, 1947 - Sections 28-F, 28-F(1) and 28K

Reported in : AIR1976SC98; (1976)GLR188; 1976LabIC4; (1976)1SCC518; [1976]2SCR280; MANU/SC/0345/1975

Advocate for Respondent : B.C. Shah, ; M.V. Goswami and ; Ambrish Kumar, Advs.

P.K. Goswami, J.1. In a long line of decisions of this Court the ambit of Section 33, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is now well established. There is also no difference in principle of the law applicable...

Smt. Chander Kali Bai and ors. Vs. Shri Jagdish Singh Thakur and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 12(1) and 13(1); Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1955 - Sections 4; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 116

Reported in : AIR1977SC2262; (1977)4SCC402; [1978]1SCR625; 1977(9)LC667(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : M.V. Goswami and ; G.S. Chatterjee, Advs.

N.L. Untwalia, J.1. In this appeal by special leave the appellants and respondent No. 2 were the defendants in a suit filed by plaintiff-respondent No. 1 for eviction and other reliefs in respect of the suit...

Swami Saran Saksena Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Civil Service Regulations - Articles 465 and 465A

Reported in : AIR1980SC269; 1980LabIC219; (1980)ILLJ103SC; (1980)1SCC12; [1980]1SCR923; 1980(12)LC193(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : G.N. Dikshit and ; M.V. Goswami, Advs.

R.S. Pathak, J.1. This appeal by special leave has been preferred by the appellant against the order of the Allahabad High Court dismissing his writ petition challenging an order of compulsory retirement.2. The appellant was appointed...