Advanced Search Results

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Vs. State Transport Appella ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 88; Rajasthan Motor Vehicles Rules, 1990 - Rule 5.9

Reported in : AIR1999Raj111; 1999(1)WLC619

Advocate for Respondent : B.L. Maheshwari,; M.S. Vyas,; Bharat Vyas and;

ORDERB.S. Chauhan, J.1. The instant petitions have been filed by the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation thereinafter called 'the Corporation') being aggrieved by the judgment and orders of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal thereinafter called 'the...

Mahaveer Textiles Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 7A, 16 and 19A

Reported in : (1995)IILLJ1057Raj; 1995(2)WLC49

Advocate for Respondent : M.S. Vyas, Adv. For Respondents 1 to 4

R.R. Yadav, J.1. The petitioner-establishment has filed the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer that he should be declared to be entitled for infancy period under Section 16...

Narottam Paliwal Vs. Regional Transport Authority, Udaipur and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehilces Act, 1988 - Sections 80(3); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1995Raj27; 1995(1)WLC95; 1994(2)WLN506

Advocate for Respondent : Vineet Kochari,; R.N. Munshi, Advs. and; S.K. Vyas,

ORDERP.K. Palli, J. 1. The petitioner has impugned the resolution of the Regional Authority Udaipur Region, Udaipur (for short called hereinafter as 'the R.T.A.') dated 21-12-1990 (Annex. P.4) and the order of the State Transport Appellate...

Shri Girish Vyas and anr. Vs. the State of Maharastra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Town Planning Act 1954 - Section 10; Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Section 6, 11, 12(2), 18, 23(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 80; Public Charitable Trust Act; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 166, 21

1. What is the nature and significance of the planning process for a large Municipal town area? In that process, what is the role of the Municipal Corporation, which is the statutory planning authority? Can the...

Amerhsip Management (P) Ltd. and 9 ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act - Sections 2(18), (22) and (38), 54, 86(2) and 87; General Clauses Act, 1897; Merchant Shipping Act, 1958

Reported in : 1996(86)ELT15(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. J.P. Deodhar, ;Mr. L.S. Vyas, ;Mr. K.C. Sidhwa and ;Ms. Jyoti Vyas, Advs., i/b., ;M/s. Vyas and ;Bhalwal

M.B. Shah, C.J. 1. In this group of Writ Petitions, the Petitioner-Companies are, inter alia, engaged in exploration/exploitation of offshore oil, gas and other related activities with the use of oil rigs on behalf of Oil...

Ashok Kumar and 9 ors. Vs. State Farm Corpn. of India Ltd. and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reported in : (1994)ILLJ1217Raj; 1993(2)WLC165

Advocate for Respondent : R.R. Vyas and; M.S. Vyas, Advs.

A.K. Mathur, J.1. All these writ petitions involve common questions of law and facts. Therefore, they are disposed of by this common order.2. For the convenient disposal of all these writ petitions, the facts given in...

Anop Singh Ratnu and ors. Vs. Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati University, ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 - Sections 12 and 17(4); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1998Raj54; 1998(1)WLC370; 1997(2)WLN441

Advocate for Respondent : Bharat Vyas,; M.S. Vyas,; V.S. Gurjar and;

ORDERP.P. Naolekar, J. 1. Since this petition and Schedule A petitions involve common questions of law and facts, therefore, they are being disposed of by this common order.2. In these batch of petitions, the petitioners have...

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Agarwal and Co.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959

Reported in : 1983LC65D(Bombay); 1983(12)ELT116(Bom); [1983]52STC117(Bom)

Mr. Sujata Manohar, J.1. Respondents Messrs Agarwal & Co. are resellers in tea, coffee and skimmed milk powder. For the period 1-4-1975 to 31-3-1976 the Sales Tax Officer subjected the sales of skimmed milk powder to...

Vijay Krishna Kumbhar Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy Property

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 22, 23(1), 26, 28, 29, 31, 37, 38, 44, 45, 47, 49, 51, 58, 59 to 112, 125, 126, 127, 128 to 151, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157 and 158; Constitution of India - Articles 13-010, 19(1), 19-045, 133, 141, 166(3) and 226; Development Control Rules, 1982 - Rules 1.3, 5, 6.1.1 and 13.5; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1931; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 12-A, 18 and 54; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 22; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37-I and 269(UA); Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 3 to 20, 21 to 58, 159, 253, 254, 255 and 481; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1951 - Sections 1 to 7; Bombay Village Panchayat Act, Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 40, 41, 42, 43, 46, 51 and 52;

Reported in : 2000(2)BomCR293

Advocate for Respondent : K.K. Venugopol, Spl. C., ;C.J. Sawant, Adv. ;Gen., R.D. Rane, A.G.P., ;D.Y. Chandrachud, A.S.G., ;R.G. Ketkar, Adv., ;Harish Salve, Sr. A., ;V.R. Dhond, ;M.J. Dabholkar, Advs., ;P.C. Madkholkar, Adv.,

ORDERB.N. Srikrishna, J.1. These two petitions are in the nature of public interest litigation, the first at the instance of a journalist from Pune and the second at the instance of a Corporator of Pune Municipal...

Vyas Automobiles Vs. Central India Motors and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10(1) - Order 6, Rule 17; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 22; Partnership Act

Reported in : AIR1959MP425

Advocate for Respondent : G.L. Ojha and ;V.V. Kulkarni, Advs.

ORDERP.V. Dixit, J.1. This is a petition to revise an order of the civil judge second class, Indore, permitting, the plaintiff non-applicant M/s Central India Motors to amend the plaint in the suit so as to,...