Advanced Search Results
State of Goa and ors. Vs. Gurudas Timblo and ors.
Mumbai
Jan-09-2003
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 22; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 76
2003(4)BomCR598
M.S. Usgaokar, Sr. Adv. and ;Sanjay S. Sardessai, Adv.
D.G. Deshpande, J.1. This first appeal is directed against the judgment and decree in Civil Suit No. 125/81 passed by the learned District Judge, South Goa, Margao, vide judgment dated 30th April, 1994.2. The plaintiffs/respondents herein...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVanessa Fernandes Vs. Francisco Fernandes and anr.
Mumbai
Apr-12-1985
Family
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 32, Rules 3 and 4(3); Portuguese Civil Code - Schedule - Article 101; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 112
AIR1986Bom89; 1985MhLJ788
M.S. Usgaokar, Adv.
Couto, J.1. Whether a suit instituted for a declaration that the plaintiff is not the father of a minor child, born to his legally wedded wife whilst the marriage is subsisting, can validly be proceeded with...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMagic Wash Industries (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Asst. Provident Fund Commi ...
Mumbai
Nov-26-1998
Labour and Industrial
Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 16(1)
[1999(82)FLR772]; (1999)IILLJ792Bom
G.V. Tamba, C.G.S.C.
R.K. Batta, J. 1. Petitioner 1 is registered as a Small Scale Industrial Unit with the Directorate of Industries and Mines, Government of Goa. The manufacturing process of the petitioner commenced from May 26, 1986. Petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mandakini Pundalik Salkar Vs. Chandrasen Raikar
Mumbai
Sep-17-1985
Family
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 22 and 23; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5, 11 and 12
AIR1986Bom172
M.S. Usgaonkar, Adv.
1. This appeal by the original defendant is directed against the judgment and decree dt. 29th Sept. 1984 whereby the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Mapusa, decreed the suit filed against the appellant and consequently, annulled...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGoa Auto Accessories Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Sales Tax and Anothe ...
Mumbai
Oct-27-1999
Sales Tax
Goa Sales Tax Act, 1964 - Sections 4, 7(1), 9 and 27-A ; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1956; Maharashtra Municipalities Octroi Rules, 1968; Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 - Sections 5(1); Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948; Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957
2000(3)BomCR122; (2000)1BOMLR132; 2000(2)MhLj732
J.E. Coelho Pereira, Advocate General and ;J. Godinho, Addl. Govt. Advocate
ORDERR.K. Batta, J.1. The petitioner had sought classification of brake shoes and other processed components manufactured by them under Schedule Twenty-Eight of the Goa Sales Tax Act, 1964 (hereinafter called 'the said Act'). According to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Motibai Sarvotham Pai Cano W/O Sarvotham Pai Cano and ors. Vs. Sm ...
Mumbai
Aug-03-1993
Tenancy
Goa, Daman & Diu Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968 - Sections 59;
1994(2)BomCR628
B. Reis, S.A., and William Gomes, Adv.
G.D. Kamat, J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment and appellate decree dated 9th March, 1990, made in First Civil Appeal No.100/88, by a learned Single Judge of this Court. The First Civil...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShantilal Khushaldas and Bros. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Chandanbala Sughir S ...
Mumbai
Feb-14-1992
Company
Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 6 and 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 3, Rule 1; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(11), 10, 243, 433, 434, 434(1), 439 and 439(1)
[1993]77CompCas253(Bom)
M.S. Usgaokar, Adv.
G.D. Kamat, J. 1. This application is made in judge's summons praying for the dismissal of the Company Petition No. 5/S/91 instituted by the respondents for winding up the applicant-company under section 433 of the Companies...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskComunidade of Chicalim and anr. Vs. Administrator of Comunidades of Sa ...
Mumbai
Aug-31-1993
Civil
Goa, Daman and Diu (Administration and Removal of Difficulties) Order, 1962
1994(2)BomCR540
M.S. Usgaokar, S.A. and S.S. Usgaokar, Advs. for the respondent No. 1, ;J.E. Coelho Pereira, A.G. and ;J. Godinho, Adv. for the respondent Nos. 2 to 4
M.L. Pendse, J. The petitioner No.1 is the Comunidade of Chicalim of Mormugao Taluka. There are fourteen Comunidades in Mormugao Taluka including Chicalim. Under Legislative Diploma No. 2070 the Comunidades of Talukas in Goa, Salcete and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskComunidade of Chicalim Vs. Administrator of Comunidades of Salcete and ...
Mumbai
Aug-31-1993
Civil
Goa, Daman and Diu (Administration) Removal of Difficulties Order, 1962
1994(4)BomCR357; (1993)95BOMLR281
M.S. Usgaokar, Senior Adv. and ;S.S. Usgaokar, Adv. for respondent No. 1 and ;J.E. Coelho Pereira and ;J. Godinho, Advs. for respondents Nos. 2 to 4
M.L. Pendse, J.1. The petitioner No. 1 is the Comunidade of Chicalim of Mormugao Taluka. There are fourteen Comunidades in Mormugao Taluka including Chicalim. Under Legislative Diploma No. 2070 the Comunidades of Talukas in Goa, Salcete...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Colfax Laboratories and Another Vs. the State of Goa, Through the ...
Mumbai
Apr-01-1999
Excise
Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955 - Sections 2, 3, 6 and 19; Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Rules, 1956 - Rules 11, 12, 60(1) and 68; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 3; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 10; Companies act, 1956; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3
1999(3)BomCR704
M.S. Usgaokar, Advocate General and ;S.S. Usgaokar, Adv.
ORDERR.K. Batta, J. 1. The first petitioner; M/s. Colfax Laboratories (India) Limited, is a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. The second petitioner, Mr. Eric Menezes is the Managing Director and Shareholder therein. The petitioners...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »