Advanced Search Results
Sasivarnam Vs. S. Gnanasundari Kamalam
Chennai
Mar-29-1954
Family
Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 2 and 14
AIR1954Mad1018
M.S. Sethu, Adv.
1. This matter comes before us under Section 17, Indian Divorce Act 4 of 1869 for confirmation of the decree nisi granted by the learned District Judge of Madurai.2. The husband of the first respondent is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTebma Shipyards Limited Vs. Board of Trustees of TuticorIn Port Trust
Chennai
Aug-05-2011
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226, 14; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Section 171; Major Port Trust Act; Contract Act - Section 171
Mr. S. Yashwanth, Adv.
1. The petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, with a prayer for issuance of a Writ, in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the order dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.T. Sahib Vs. N. Hasan Ghani Sahib and ors.
Chennai
Dec-10-1956
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 33, 157 and 158; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 476; Legal Practitioners Act - Sections 13
AIR1957Mad646
S.V. Venugopalachariar, ;T.V. Balakrishnan and ;S. Ramchandra Iyer, Advs.
Ramaswami, J. 1. These are connected appeals directed against the decrees and judgments of the learned Subordinate Judge of Tirunelveli in O. S. Nos. 113 of 1950 and 25 of 1951.2. The facts are: The first...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Hehnamann Homeo Institute, by Proprietor, Dr. S. Srinivasan Vs. Govern ...
Chennai
Apr-03-1970
Constitution
(1974)1MLJ22
ORDERM.M. Ismail, J.1. The petitioner in this writ petition is one Hehnamann Homeo Institute, Tiruvarur, Thanjavur District, by proprietor Dr. S. Srinivasan. He has sworn to an affidavit filed in support of the Writ petition. In...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.A. Chidambaram Chettiar Firm and ors. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu an ...
Chennai
Aug-09-1976
Civil
Tamil Nadu Debt Relief Act, 1976; Tamil Nadu State Legislature (Delegation of Powers) Act, 1976 - Sections 2 and 3; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 31(1), 31(2), 46, 251, 254, 301 and 304; Tamil Nadu Indebted Agriculturists (Temporary Relief) Act, 1976; Tamil Nadu Indebted Persons (Temporary Relief) Act, 1976; Tamil Nadu Indebted Agriculturists and Indebted Persons (Special Provisions) Act, 1976; Madras Agriculturists' Relief Act, 1938; Usurious Loans Act, 1918; Negotiable Instruments Act; Gold Control Act
AIR1977Mad153
1. In this batch of writ petitions, a writ of declaration to declare the Tamil Nadu Debt Relief Act 1976 (President's Act of Tamil Nadu 31 of 1976) as unconstitutional, illegal and void is sought.2. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSethu Samudhra Shipping Services and Others Vs. Commissioner of Custom ...
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Oct-06-2009
Land Acquisition
The appellants herein, who are Custom House Agents, are aggrieved by the imposition of penalties of Rs.1 lakh each under the provisions of Section 114 (i) of the Customs Act for their involvement in the act...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPublic Prosecutor Vs. Arulswami
Chennai
Dec-03-1963
Criminal
Madras Village Panchayats Act, 1950 - Sections 106, 127 and 127(1)
AIR1964Mad350; 1964CriLJ167
M.S. Sethu, Adv.
Kailasam, J.1. This is an appeal by the Public Prosecutor against the acquittal of the respondent by the Additional Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, of an offence Under Section 409 I. P: C. The respondent was tried by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Public Prosecutor Vs. N.T. Kathirvelu
Chennai
Dec-12-1958
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 123
AIR1959Mad518; 1959CriLJ1444
M.S. Sethu and ;P.N. George, Advs.
Somasundaram, J1. This is an appeal by the State against the acquittal pf the respondent on a charge of not paying the tax due for the quarter. There is no doubt about the fact that on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Madras Vs. V.R.B. Gopalarathnam Gupta
Chennai
Apr-26-1956
Sales Tax
[1957]8STC16(Mad)
S. Thyagaraja Aiyar ;and M.S. Sethu, Advs.
Krishnaswami Nayudu, J.1. The State is the appellant. The plaintiff was assessed to sales tax in the sum of Rs. 800-3-9 for the two assessment years 1948-49 and 1949-50 in respect of the turnover of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPublic Prosecutor Vs. M.S. Palaniappan and anr.
Chennai
Mar-29-1957
CriminalFood Adulteration
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 25(2); Madras Prevention of Adulteration Act, 1918 - Sections 20
AIR1957Mad736; 1957CriLJ1294
M.S. Sethu and ;S. Palaniswami, Advs.
Somasundaram, J.1. This is an appeal by the State against the order of acquittal by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate in C. C. No. 35 of 1956 on his file.2. The prosecution is for an offence under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »