Advanced Search Results

In Re: N. Narasimhan and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 283 and 283(1)

Reported in : AIR1975Mad330

Advocate for Respondent : M.S. Sethia, Adv.

1. Mohan J., having found a conflict between Komalangiammal v. Sowbagiammal, 59 Mad LJ 529 = (AIR 1931 Mad 37) decided by a Division Bench and Jayakumar v. Ramarathnam, , of a singleJudge, has referred the...

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Sethia Foods

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2003)(156)ELT395TriDel

2. The Revenue filed this appeal against the order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals). In the present appeal the Revenue wants to club the clearances of M/s. Sethia Foods with the clearances of M/s.Sethia Sweet Products...

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Blue Blend (i) Ltd., Sethia

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2004)(173)ELT182Tri(Mum.)bai

1. The assessees herein are engaged in the manufacture of PTY/Twisted Yarn falling under CET Sub-Heading 54.02. On the basis of intelligence received by officers of the Anti-Evasion Directorate that they are indulging in evasion of...

Velmurugan Engineering Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)(187)ELT371Tri(Chennai)

1. This Appeal has been filed by M/s. Velmurugan Engineering against Order-in-Original No. 14/2004, dated 28-5-2004 by which the Commissioner of Central Excise has confirmed demand of Rs. 15,68,582.25 and penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs.2. Shri...

Swastik Oil Refinery Private Limited Vs. Union of India and Anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service Tax

ORDER SHEET APOT NO.195 of 2017 GA No.3049 of 2017 WP No.506 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SWASTIK OIL REFINERY PRIVATE LIMITED Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR....

Durga Associates, Raipur Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 133 and 226

Reported in : AIR1982All490

Advocate for Respondent : R.N. Trivedi, ;P. Kant and ;V.B. Upadhyaya, Advs.

K.S. Varma, J. 1. In order to appreciate the controversy giving rise to these petitions certain facts will have to be stated in some detail. The State of U. P. through opposite party No. 2 invited...