Advanced Search Results

H.S. Vasantasenaiah Vs. Divisional Controller, Ksrtc

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : ILR1994KAR2628; 1994(4)KarLJ334; (1995)IILLJ835Kant

Advocate for Respondent : M.S. Narayan, Adv. for Ram Mohan Reddy for R-1

Hari Nath Tilhari, J.1. This Writ Appeal arises out of Judgment and Order dated 29-7-1991 delivered by the learned single Judge (Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shivaraj Patil) in W.P.No. 16141/1991 dismissing the petitioner's claim challenging the award...

Anitha W/O K.R. Keshavamurthy, Vs. Bwssb by Its Secretary and

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Limitation Act - Sections 5; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 110(1), 110A, 110B, 110C, 110(I), 163A, 165 and 166

Reported in : 2010ACJ27:2009(4)KCCR2539:AIR2009(3)KarR259:AIR2009NOC2717(D.B).

Advocate for Respondent : M.S. Narayan, Adv. for R1,; Muralidhar, Adv. for R2,; N.S. Bhat, Adv. for R1-4,; Vishwanath S. Shettar, Adv. for R6,; B.V. Murlidhar, Adv. for R7 and A.K. Bhat, Adv. for R1 to R4

Arali Nagaraj, J.1. These three MFAs., have arisen from the same judgment and award dated 12.9.2005 passed in MVC No. 3847/1998 by the MACT, Bangalore (SCCH-2). The appellants in MPA No. 1503/2006 have sought for enhancement...

The Himalaya Drug Company Vs. Taj Ahmed

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 10(1), 25B, 25B(2) and 25F

Reported in : [2005(107)FLR248]; ILR2005KAR3525; 2005(3)KarLJ589; (2005)IIILLJ504Kant

Advocate for Respondent : M.S. Narayan, Adv. for Respondent in W.P. No. 42199 of 2004 and ;M.S. Narayan and Associates for Respondent in W.P. No. 50235 of 2004

ORDERMohan Shantanagoudar, J.1. By the impugned award dated 10-8-2004 passed in Reference No. 50 of 1999, the Additional Labour Court, Bangalore accepted the reference and directed the management of M/s. Himalaya Drug Company ('management' for short)...

Sunil Sharma S/O Ved Prakash Sharma, and anr. Vs. Union of India Minis ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Respondent : Sri S Kalyari Basavaraj ; Sri M S Narayana ; Sri P D Vishwanath, Advs.

1. The petitioners have presented this petition in the nature of public interest, seeking for issue of writ of mandamus to the respondent to direct 'he committee which was appointed in terms of order No. 9/30/04-CRD...

Shri Girindra Bijoy Sahu and Shri Vs. Cc(P), Wb

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2001)(76)ECC129

1. Both the appeals are being disposed of by a common order as they arise out of the same impugned order of the Commissioner of customs, Calcutta vide which he has confiscated 19 pieces of gold...

Ramana Shetty Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Cochin

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. When the matter was called, or none appeared on behalf of the appellants. Shri Sundara Rajan appearing for the appellants M/s Narayan Kuria in appeal No. C/425 submits that though these two appeals arise out...

M/S. Narayan Construction, Hooghly Vs. Ishani Dey and Others

Court : West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

Kalidas Mukherjee, President 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by Learned District Forum, Chinsurah, Hooghly in case no.CC 25 of 2011 allowing the complaint with cost of Rs.5,000/- and directing the...

D.b.jatti Vs. M/s Jamnadas Devidas

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE12H DAY OF APRIL2023BEFORE THE HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR CRL.R.P No.964 OF2019BETWEEN D.B.JATTI, S/O. LATE. DR. B. D. JATTI, AGED ABOUT75YEARS, R/AT SY.NO.51, ECC...

Abhushan Industries Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (1983)(14)ELT2010TriDel

1. Question for decision in this appeal originally filed as revision application the Government of India, is appropriate classification of Cloth Drilling Machine and Cloth Cutting Machine.2. The Appellants through their Customs House Agent M/s. Narayan...

Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1998)(76)LC77Tri(Mum.)bai

1. Both these appeals raise a common issue, hence they are taken up together for disposal as per law.2. Appeal No. E/2738/89 has been filed by the assessee against the order dt. 25.11.1989 passed by the...