Advanced Search Results

Harish Chandra Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1979WLN(UC)105

M.C. Jain, J.1. The appellant Harish Chandra stands convicted under Section 409, IPC and has been sentenced to 1 1/2 years rigorous imprisonment and to pay; a fine of Rs. 5,000/-, in default, to undergo farther...

DLF Power Limited Vs. Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

1. By this petition filed under section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short hereinafter referred to as the Arbitration Act ), the petitioner has impugned the order dated 2nd February, 2011 passed...

Manda Jaganath Vs. K.S. Rathnam and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 324 and 329; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 15, 30, 36, 81, 100 and 100(1); Representation of the People Rules; Representation of the People Orders; Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961 - Rule 4; Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968

Reported in : AIR2004SC3600; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)527; 2004(5)ALT28(SC); JT2004(5)SC8; 2004(4)SCALE600; (2004)7SCC492

Advocate for Respondent : Rajeev Dhawan, Sr. Adv., ; R. Santhana Krishnan, ; G. Sateesh

N. Santosh Hegde, J.1. Leave granted.2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.3. The first respondent herein filed his nomination to contest elections to the Parliament from 28 Nagarkurnool (SC) Constituency. On 2.4.2004 when the said nomination...

Baldev Singh and ors. Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Environment

Reported in : 2006(3)ShimLC135

Deepak Gupta, J.1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed in the public interest by some residents of villages Batamandi and Ganguwala questioning the legality and propriety of the...

J.S. Virk Vs. R.D. Pradhan

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rule 30; Contempt of Court Act, 1971 - Sections 2

Reported in : 32(1987)DLT97

S. Ranganathan, J. (1) The petitioners in Ccp 82/86 and 176/86 came to this court with the complaint that the respondents have failed to implement the judgment of this court in C.W. 44/75 dated 2.9. 1985...

The Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank Limited Through Its Chief Offic ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : SICA

Acts : Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 73G, 79A, 91, 101, 102, 102(1), 102(2), 103, 103(4), 104, 105, 105(1), 107, 154 and 246(1); Securatization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 - Sections 2(1), 2(2), 13, 13(2), 13(4), 13(9), 13(13), 17(2), 31, 31B, 34, 35 and 37; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 2(1) and 5; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 47; Transfer of Properties Act - Sections 59; Specific Reliefs Act - Sections 20; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 172 and 176; Sale of Goods Act, 1930; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 529A and 529(1); Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956; Debt Recovery Act; Guj

Reported in : 2008(4)BomCR719

Advocate for Respondent : N.B. Khandare, Govt. Pleader for Respondent No. 1 to 3, ;Dilip Bankar Patil, Adv. for Respondent No. 5, ;P.R. Patil, Adv. for Respondent No. 6, ;V.D. Salunke, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 7 to 11, ;B.L. S

N.V. Dabholkar, J.1. All ten writ petitions, together with four surviving civil applications therein, are being considered together, for disposal. Common factor in all these matters, is Godavari Dudhna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. at and post...

Anil (Vidyarthi) and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra Represented by t ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. This Full Bench has been constituted to answer the following question:- Whether a remedy of election dispute under Section 16 of the said Act or Section 21 of the said Act of...

Dr. A.K. Rai, Consultant and Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

1. By this OA, applicant has challenged order dated 10.9.2007 whereby respondent No. 4 has been asked to act as Head of Department (HOD) of ENT in supersession of previous orders. He has also sought that...

“In This Incident in All Persons Namely Gurvinder Singh Randeep Sing ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

CRM Nos.M-10729 of 2014 and 6323 of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH1 Criminal Misc. No.M-10729 of 2014 Johny @ Jaspreet Singh & Ors. ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab & Ors....

Sudarshan Chemical Industries Ltd. Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 24(4)

Reported in : (2003)135PLR89

Advocate for Respondent : Rajdeep Singh Cheema, A.A.G.

S.S. Nijjar, J.1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with a prayer for quashing the complaint dated 21.2.1997, Annexure P-1, the order dated 15.9.1999, Annexure P-14, passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,...