Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: m s ganesh · Page 1 of about 618 results (0.379 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 06 2008

Pernod Ricard S.A. France and anr. Vs. Rhizome Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-06-2008

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2 and 17; Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 2(1), 8, 10(1) and 124(5); Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : LC2009(1)112; 2009(39)PTC367(Del)

Advocate for Respondent : M.S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv., ; K. Seshachary and ; Manish Gandhi

Reva Khetrapal, J.1. The present action has been filed by the plaintiffs for permanent injunction against the defendants restraining infringement of its registered trademark, copyright, passing off, rendition of accounts of profit/damages, delivery up, dilution, unfair...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2007

Adhunik Alloys and Power Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Apr-04-2007

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines and Mineral (Regulation and Development) Act, 1960 - Sections 2, 4, 5, 5(1), 10, 11, 11(5), 13, 17(2), 17(4) and 17A; Mines and Mineral (Regulation and Development) (Amendment) Act, 1987; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 3A, 3A(1), 3B and 4; Cantonment Act, 1910; Statute Law (Repeals) Act, 1906; Cantonments Act 1924 - Sections 60; Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1917 - Sections 6(1); Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 127; Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1947 - Sections 3(2), 6 and 7; Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 15(1), 21(2), 26(1), 31, 39(1), 40, 58, 58

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR1185; [2007(2)JCR357(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : M.S. Ganesh,; J.P. Gupta,; C.S. Poddar,;

M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. In these writ applications, the petitioners have prayed for quashing the letter dated 13.9.2005 issued by the State Government withdrawing the proposal of the petitioners for approval Under Section 5(1) of the Mines...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 2000

The A.P. State Wakf Board Hyderabad Vs. All India Shia Conference (Bra ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-02-2000

Subject : CivilTrusts and Societies

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 27(1) and 80 - Order 41, Rules 25 and 28; Muslim Wakfs Act - Sections 56

Reported in : JT2000(3)SC194; 2000(2)SCALE376; (2000)3SCC528; [2000]2SCR78

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. M.S. Ganesh

1. Delay condoned.2. Application for substitution is allowed.3. This appeal is preferred by the Andhra Pradesh Wakf Board against the judgment of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in CCC Appeal No. 41 of 1980, dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 15 2010

P.K. Mohan Ram Vs. B.N. Ananthachary and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-15-2010

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 19 and 21; Indian Succession Act - Sections 3, 49, 119 and 120; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 47 - Order 2, Rule 2; Hindu Law

Reported in : 2010(2)SCALE7

Advocate for Respondent : M.S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv., ; R. Ayyam Perumal, ; K. Seshachary

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. This is an appeal for setting aside judgment dated 27.2.2001 passed by the learned Single Judge of Madras High Court in Second Appeal No. 1090/1983 and Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 8137/1983 whereby he...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 1999

Boddu Narayanamma Vs. Venkatarama Aluminium Co. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-21-1999

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Buildings(Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 - Sections 1(2), 2, 26, 32 and 10(3); Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, 1952 - Sections 13(1);

Reported in : AIR1999SC3549; JT1999(7)SC364; 1999(6)SCALE122; (1999)7SCC589; [1999]Supp3SCR20

Advocate for Respondent : M.S. Ganesh, ; Nikhil Nayyar and ; B. Sunita Rao, Advs.

Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. This appeal, by special leave, is from the judgment and order of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Civil Revision Petition No. 134 of 1996 passed on July 29, 1997....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 1994

Liberty Oil Mills (P) Ltd., Bombay Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Bo ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-13-1994

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1995LC417(SC); 1995(75)ELT13(SC); 1994(5)SCALE224; (1995)1SCC451; [1994]Supp6SCR547

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. M.S. Ganesh

K.S. Paripoornan, J.1. This batch of 4 connected appeals under the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944, is filed by the assessee by -special leave granted by this Court. The revenue issued six demand notices against...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 1989

S.M.D. Kiran Pasha Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-09-1989

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 22, 22(7), 32, 226 and 226(1);Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986 - Sections 2(3), 3(3) and 10;

Reported in : 1989(3)Crimes759(SC); JT1989(4)SC366; 1989(2)SCALE1083; (1990)1SCC328; [1989]Supp2SCR105

Advocate for Respondent : M.S. Ganesh, ; S. Muralidhar, ; T.V.S.N. Chari and ;

K.N. Saikia, J.1. Special leave granted.2. This appeal is from the Judgment and Order of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad dated 4.7.1988 passed in Writ Petition No. 8610 of 1988.3. The appellant states...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2001

M/S. Bajaj Auto Limited Vs. Vikram Singh Mehta and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-22-2001

Subject : Property

Reported in : 2001VAD(Delhi)1045; 91(2001)DLT593; 2001(59)DRJ213

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Arun Mohan, Sr. Adv and ; Mr. Jitesh Malik, Adv.

ORDERDevinder Gupta, J.1. Whether or not learned Single Judge in the impugned order passed on 19.12.2000 has correctly exercised discretion by allowing plaintiffs/respondents to amend the plaint. This is the short question arising for determination in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2004

Kanti Lal Vs. Legal Representatives of Late Smt. Chand Kumari

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-07-2004

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 - Sections 13(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100

Reported in : RLW2004(2)Raj1190; 2004(2)WLC26

Advocate for Respondent : Rajendra Mehta, Adv.

Prakash Tatia, J.1. This second appeal by the plaintiff- appellant, is against the judgment and decree dated 5.4.1980 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge No. 2, Jodhpur whereby the learned Addl. District Judge No. 2...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 1992

Chhoga Lal Vs. Legal Representatives of Deceased Keshav Lal and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-11-1992

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : 1993(1)WLC349; 1992(2)WLN232

B.R. Arora, J.1. Appellant Chhoga Lal and respondent Ganesh Mal were the partners in a business firm M/S Ganesh Mal Bhagwanji and Company, Sumerpur. Dispute arose between the two partners Chhoga Lal and Ganesh Mal and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial