Advanced Search Results
Pernod Ricard S.A. France and anr. Vs. Rhizome Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. ...
Delhi
Nov-06-2008
Intellectual Property Rights
Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2 and 17; Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 2(1), 8, 10(1) and 124(5); Constitution of India - Article 227
LC2009(1)112; 2009(39)PTC367(Del)
M.S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv., ; K. Seshachary and ; Manish Gandhi
Reva Khetrapal, J.1. The present action has been filed by the plaintiffs for permanent injunction against the defendants restraining infringement of its registered trademark, copyright, passing off, rendition of accounts of profit/damages, delivery up, dilution, unfair...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAdhunik Alloys and Power Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...
Jharkhand
Apr-04-2007
Commercial
Mines and Mineral (Regulation and Development) Act, 1960 - Sections 2, 4, 5, 5(1), 10, 11, 11(5), 13, 17(2), 17(4) and 17A; Mines and Mineral (Regulation and Development) (Amendment) Act, 1987; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 3A, 3A(1), 3B and 4; Cantonment Act, 1910; Statute Law (Repeals) Act, 1906; Cantonments Act 1924 - Sections 60; Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1917 - Sections 6(1); Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 127; Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1947 - Sections 3(2), 6 and 7; Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 15(1), 21(2), 26(1), 31, 39(1), 40, 58, 58
2007(2)BLJR1185; [2007(2)JCR357(Jhr)]
M.S. Ganesh,; J.P. Gupta,; C.S. Poddar,;
M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. In these writ applications, the petitioners have prayed for quashing the letter dated 13.9.2005 issued by the State Government withdrawing the proposal of the petitioners for approval Under Section 5(1) of the Mines...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe A.P. State Wakf Board Hyderabad Vs. All India Shia Conference (Bra ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-02-2000
CivilTrusts and Societies
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 27(1) and 80 - Order 41, Rules 25 and 28; Muslim Wakfs Act - Sections 56
JT2000(3)SC194; 2000(2)SCALE376; (2000)3SCC528; [2000]2SCR78
Mr. M.S. Ganesh
1. Delay condoned.2. Application for substitution is allowed.3. This appeal is preferred by the Andhra Pradesh Wakf Board against the judgment of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in CCC Appeal No. 41 of 1980, dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
P.K. Mohan Ram Vs. B.N. Ananthachary and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-15-2010
FamilyProperty
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 19 and 21; Indian Succession Act - Sections 3, 49, 119 and 120; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 47 - Order 2, Rule 2; Hindu Law
2010(2)SCALE7
M.S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv., ; R. Ayyam Perumal, ; K. Seshachary
G.S. Singhvi, J.1. This is an appeal for setting aside judgment dated 27.2.2001 passed by the learned Single Judge of Madras High Court in Second Appeal No. 1090/1983 and Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 8137/1983 whereby he...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBoddu Narayanamma Vs. Venkatarama Aluminium Co. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-21-1999
Tenancy
Andhra Pradesh Buildings(Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 - Sections 1(2), 2, 26, 32 and 10(3); Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, 1952 - Sections 13(1);
AIR1999SC3549; JT1999(7)SC364; 1999(6)SCALE122; (1999)7SCC589; [1999]Supp3SCR20
M.S. Ganesh, ; Nikhil Nayyar and ; B. Sunita Rao, Advs.
Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. This appeal, by special leave, is from the judgment and order of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Civil Revision Petition No. 134 of 1996 passed on July 29, 1997....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLiberty Oil Mills (P) Ltd., Bombay Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Bo ...
Supreme Court of India
Dec-13-1994
Excise
1995LC417(SC); 1995(75)ELT13(SC); 1994(5)SCALE224; (1995)1SCC451; [1994]Supp6SCR547
Sri. M.S. Ganesh
K.S. Paripoornan, J.1. This batch of 4 connected appeals under the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944, is filed by the assessee by -special leave granted by this Court. The revenue issued six demand notices against...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.M.D. Kiran Pasha Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-09-1989
Criminal
Constitution of India - Articles 21, 22, 22(7), 32, 226 and 226(1);Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986 - Sections 2(3), 3(3) and 10;
1989(3)Crimes759(SC); JT1989(4)SC366; 1989(2)SCALE1083; (1990)1SCC328; [1989]Supp2SCR105
M.S. Ganesh, ; S. Muralidhar, ; T.V.S.N. Chari and ;
K.N. Saikia, J.1. Special leave granted.2. This appeal is from the Judgment and Order of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad dated 4.7.1988 passed in Writ Petition No. 8610 of 1988.3. The appellant states...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Bajaj Auto Limited Vs. Vikram Singh Mehta and anr.
Delhi
Mar-22-2001
Property
2001VAD(Delhi)1045; 91(2001)DLT593; 2001(59)DRJ213
Mr. Arun Mohan, Sr. Adv and ; Mr. Jitesh Malik, Adv.
ORDERDevinder Gupta, J.1. Whether or not learned Single Judge in the impugned order passed on 19.12.2000 has correctly exercised discretion by allowing plaintiffs/respondents to amend the plaint. This is the short question arising for determination in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKanti Lal Vs. Legal Representatives of Late Smt. Chand Kumari
Rajasthan
Jan-07-2004
TenancyCivil
Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 - Sections 13(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100
RLW2004(2)Raj1190; 2004(2)WLC26
Rajendra Mehta, Adv.
Prakash Tatia, J.1. This second appeal by the plaintiff- appellant, is against the judgment and decree dated 5.4.1980 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge No. 2, Jodhpur whereby the learned Addl. District Judge No. 2...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChhoga Lal Vs. Legal Representatives of Deceased Keshav Lal and anr.
Rajasthan
Nov-11-1992
Arbitration
1993(1)WLC349; 1992(2)WLN232
B.R. Arora, J.1. Appellant Chhoga Lal and respondent Ganesh Mal were the partners in a business firm M/S Ganesh Mal Bhagwanji and Company, Sumerpur. Dispute arose between the two partners Chhoga Lal and Ganesh Mal and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »