Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: m rathinam · Page 1 of about 30 results (0.094 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 08 2001

G. Manjula Vs. the Principal Amala Annai Teacher Training Institute Ti ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-08-2001

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2001)1MLJ786

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. P. Pepin Fernando, Adv., ;Mr. M. Rathinam, Additional Government Pleader and ;Mr. P.V. Bakthavatchalam, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the selection list published by the 1st respondent dated 19.9.2000 selecting the candidate for the Diploma Course in Teacher Training in the 1st respondent school and for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2001

Tamil Nadu Nursery Primary Matriculation and Higher Secondary School M ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-30-2001

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : AIR2002Mad55

Advocate for Respondent : M. Rathinsm, AGP

ORDERD. Murugesan, J.1. The petitioner is Tamil Nadu Nursery Primary Matriculation and Higher Secondary School Management's Association represented by its General Secretary, Chennai. The petitioner has challenged the order of the 1st respondent made in G.O....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2013

M.Rathinam Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-25-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.P.RAY THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JULY 2013 3RD SRAVANA, 1935 OP.No. 34008 of 2001 (W) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- M. RATHINAM, S/O.MALAIKULAINTHA PILLAI, KAROOR...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 26 2014

The Chief Secretary Vs. the Home Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-26-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:- 01.10.2009 Coram:- The Honble Mr. Justice R.REGUPATHI Crl.O.P. Nos.33757, 33881, 34416, 10367, 10524 & 10536/05, 4699, 7496, 7765, 17258, 150 & 720 of 2006 & Crl.R.C. No.710/2006...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 1998

The Correspondent, St. Ignatius Higher Secondary School, Kurumbanai-62 ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-10-1998

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India -- Article 30; Tamil Nadu Private Recognised Schools (Regulations) Rules 1974 -- Rules 9(2)

Reported in : 1999(1)CTC121

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. M. Rathinam, Government Adv.

ORDER1. In both these Writ Petitions, petitioners seek the issuance of writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents from insisting on the petitioner- Schoolto create an endowment of Rs. 25,000/- as a pre-condition for the grant of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 2000

Mathuraivelan Pillai Vs. the District Collector Dindigul Mannar Thirum ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-19-2000

Subject : Property

Acts : Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Harijan Welfare Schemes Act, 1978 - Sections 4(2)

Reported in : (2001)1MLJ645

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. M. Rathinam Additional Government Pleader

ORDERV.S. Sirpurkar, J. 1. The writ appeal is against the dismissal of the writ petition by the learned single judge by which the petitioner had challenged the proceedings of acquisition under Section.4 of the Tamil Nadu...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 1997

Thirumathi Pushpa Bai Bainsingh Vs. District Collector Tirunelveli Kat ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-17-1997

Subject : Civil

Acts : Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Harijan Welfare Scheme Act, 1978 -- Sections 4

Reported in : 1998(1)CTC281

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. M. Rathinam, Government Advocate

ORDERJudgemend Pronounced by Thanikkachalam, A.C.J.,1. The writ petitioner is the appellant herein. The writ petitioner filed the writ petition for issue of a writ of cortiorarified mandamus, calling for the records relating to the order passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 1991

Mohamed Ibrahim and Others Vs. Chellammal

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-23-1991

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 22, Rule 4;

Reported in : AIR1991Mad309; (1991)IMLJ334

Advocate for Respondent : M. Rathinam, Adv.

ORDER1. No doubt the contention of learned Counsel for the petitioner is correct in law, as the appeal filed by the respondent herein before the Subordinate Judge was a stillborn one as the defendant in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 2000

The Workmen of Nilgiris Co-operative Marketing Society Limited, Rep. b ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-12-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10 and 25-D; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 7, 10, 12 and 103; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1971

Reported in : (2001)ILLJ1095Mad

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. M. Rathinam, Government Advocate, ;Mr. A.L. Somayaji, ;Senior Counsel for Mr. K.V. Venugopal, Adv.

ORDERM. Chockalingam, J. 1. This judgment shall govern writ appeal Nos. 109 and 110 of 1989 andwrit petition No.14659 of 1989.2. The above two writ appeals have arisen from a common order rendered by the learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 1998

Association of Management of Hindu Educational Institutions, Tamil Nad ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-03-1998

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Employment Exchange (Compulsory Notification of Vacancies) Act, 1959 -- Sections 4; Tamil Nadu Private Schools Regulation Act, 1976; Constitution of India -- Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 1998(2)CTC172

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.T.R. Rajagopalan,;Additional Advocate General for Mr.M. Rathinam, Government Adv.

ORDER1. When the miscellaneous petition came up for hearing as agreed bythe learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional AdvocateGeneral for the respondents, the main writ petition itself is taken up for finalhearing.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial