Advanced Search Results
Mansing Nana Shinde Vs. The State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jul-04-2016
Criminal
Oral Judgment: 1. The appellant-original accused has questioned the correctness of the Judgment and Order dated 22nd January 1998 passed by the IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Satara in Sessions Case No.27 of 1991 convicting the appellant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSampat Narayan Hake and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Dec-17-2012
Criminal
Oral Judgment: 1. The appellants were prosecuted on the allegation of having committed offences punishable under section 498A IPC, 306 IPC, 304 IPC, 201 IPC and section 176 of the IPC read with section 34 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrakash D. Kate Vs. The State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jan-11-2016
Criminal
1. The appellant and five others were prosecuted on the allegation of having committed offences punishable under Section 306 of the IPC r/w Section 34 of the IPC and 498A of the IPC r/w section 34...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sunil Pannalal Chauhan Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jan-16-2013
Criminal
Oral Order: The applicant was prosecuted on the allegation of having committed offences punishable under Sections 489A, 489C and 489D of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). He was convicted of offences punishable under Section 489A and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohammed Shabbir Vs. The State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jan-18-2016
Criminal
Oral Judgment: 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 18th May 2009 delivered by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, convicting the appellant, who was the accused in Sessions case No.720 of 2008...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJitendra Kumar Jain Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another
Mumbai
Dec-03-2014
Land Acquisition
Oral Order: 1. This Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 21st September 2012 delivered by the Special Judge, Silvassa, in Special Case No.1 of 2009, convicting the appellant who was the accused in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMuka Biren Rathod Vs. The State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Dec-08-2015
Criminal
Oral Judgment: 1. The appellant was prosecuted on the allegation of having committed offences punishable under Sections 307 of the Indian Penal Code (For short, âIPCâ?), 457 of the IPC, 380 of the IPC and 511...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Maharashtra Vs. Nizamuddin Kutubuddin Ansari
Mumbai
Aug-20-2015
Education
Oral Judgment: 1. The respondent, along with four others, was prosecuted on the allegation of having committed an offence punishable under section 3(a) of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as âthe...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunil D. Thaware Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jan-07-2010
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 167(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376
M.R. Tidke, A.P.P.
ORDERD.G. Karnik, J.1. Heard.2. By this application, the applicant takes exception to the order dated 25th September 2009 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ichalkaranji refusing to accept the bail and surety furnished by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. Rajesh Bhalchandra Chalke Vs. M/S Emco Dynatorq Pvt. Ltd.
Mumbai
Dec-07-2010
Criminal
Negotiable Instruments Act (NI) - Section 138; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 200, 482, 252 ; Companies Act - Section 293; Constitution of India - Article 227; Amending Act - Sections 143 to 147
Mr. M.R. Tidke, Adv.
:1.This petition has been placed before the Full Bench for considering the question about interpretation of Section 145 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 read with Sections 118, 138, 139, 142, 143 and 146 of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›