Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: m r pillai · Page 1 of about 6 results (0.213 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 16 2016

Indian Coffee Workers Co-op. Society Ltd. Vs. Albert and Others

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Sep-16-2016

Subject : MRTP

Oral Judgment: 1. Rule heard finally with consent of learned counsel for the parties. The question that arises for consideration in this writ petition is whether a complaint under Section 28 of the Maharashtra Recognition of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 1998

Shri H.V. Rangaswamy and Another Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Anot ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-25-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 190, 195, 202 and 340; Constitution of India - Articles 142, 226 and 227; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B, 409, 420, 463, 467, 468, 471, 474, 475 and 476

Reported in : 1998(5)BomCR499

Advocate for Respondent : M.P. Galeria, A.P.P., ;M.R. Pillai, Adv.

ORDERS.S. Nijjar, J. 1. This petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing and setting aside the orders passed by the Additional Sessions Judge for Greater Mumbai dated 9th October,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 2008

Ashok Kelwade and ors. Vs. Vidarbha Gas Vessels Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-05-2008

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition Of Trade Unions And Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 30 (2) and 44; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 25F, 25G, 25H and 25N; Industrial Disputes Rules - Rule 81

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR253; 2008(5)BomCR18; (2008)110BOMLR2679; [2008(119)FLR347]; (2009)ILLJ83Bom

Advocate for Respondent : M.R. Pillai, Adv.

A.B. Chaudhari, J.1. By the present petition, the petitioners workmen have challenged the judgment and order dated 24.2.2003, made by the Member of Industrial Court, Nagpur in Revision ULPN No.156/2002, by which the learned Industrial Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 18 2007

Hdfc Bank Ltd. and anr. Vs. Nagpur District Security Guard Board and a ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-18-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Rules, 1981 - Rules 13 and 42; Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1981; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 24, 25, 173, 200, 301, 302 and 495; Constitution of India - Article 12

Reported in : 2008CriLJ995

Advocate for Respondent : M.R. Pillai, Adv.

ORDERC.L. Pangarkar, J.1. Rule. Heard finally with consent of parties.2. By this application, the applicants challenge the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate (F.C.) whereby he allowed the application of the non-applicant No. 2 to assist...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 1979

State of Maharashtra Vs. Jayantilal Popatlal Chandrani, Etc. Etc.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-02-1979

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1979CriLJ1231; 1979MhLJ584

Deshmukh, C.J.1. This is a common reference made to the Full Bench in relation to nine different matters pending before the learned single Judge of this Court.2. There is some dispute as to whether all the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 1984

State of Maharashtra Vs. Jayantilal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-17-1984

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952 - Sections 22-A and 22-B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 5(2), 98 and 165

Reported in : AIR1984SC612; 1984CriLJ334; 1984(1)Crimes711(SC); 1984(1)SCALE89; (1984)1SCC583; [1984]2SCR431

Advocate for Respondent : N.M. Ghatate and ; V.D. Deshpande, Advs.

Ranganath Misra, J.1. This appeal by special leave at the instance of the State of Maharashtra is directed against the decision of a Full Bench of the High Court of Bombay dealing with an interesting question...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial