Advanced Search Results
Indian Nval Canteen Service Employees Un Vs. Union of India
Kerala
Sep-12-2013
Land Acquisition
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE THURSDAY, THE12H DAY OF SEPTEMBER201321ST BHADRA, 1935 WP(C).No. 32100 of 2011 (J) --------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. INDIAN NAVAL CANTEEN SERVICE EMPLOYEES' UNION (REG.NO.07-62...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. and ors. Vs. Umesh Korga Bhandari and o ...
Mumbai
Mar-09-2001
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10(1) and 25F; Constitution of India - Article 309; Department Canteen Employees Rules, 1980
[2001(90)FLR713]; (2001)IILLJ157Bom
N.D. Buch, Adv.
1. All these three appeals can be disposed of by this common Judgment since the point involved is the same. In addition, Writ Petitions, out of which these L.P.As. arise, were disposed of by the learned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOil and Natural Gas Commission Vs. Petroleum Employees Union and ors.
Mumbai
Nov-29-2005
Labour and Industrial
Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 46; Contract Labour (Regulations and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 10, 10(1) and 10(2); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 3(13); Constitution of India - Article 226
2006(2)BomCR574
S.S. Pakale, Adv. for respondent No. 1
Lodha R.M., J.1. Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Limited (for short the Corporation*) is in appeal aggrieved by the order of the learned Single Judge dated January 13,1997 whereby the Corporation has been directed to absorb...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Steel Plant Canteen Employees Union, Visakhapatnam and Others Vs. Chai ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jan-17-2001
Labour and Industrial
Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 46 and 65; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 9, 10, 12, 23 and 25; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226; Companies Act, 1956; Andhra Pradesh Factories Rules, 1950 - Rule 66
2001(1)ALD537; 2001(1)ALT665
Mr. V. Ravinder Rao, ;Mr. V. Hariharan, Advs.
1. These two writ petitions can be disposed of by this common judgment as the issue involved is to treat the petitioners in both the writ petitions as the regular employees of the respondent viz., Visakhapatnam...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBokaro Ispat Kamgar Union Vs. the Chairman, Sail Ispat Bhawan and ors.
Jharkhand
May-07-2003
Trusts and Societies
Bihar Co-operative Societies Act, 1935 - Sections 14
[2003(3)JCR663(Jhr)]
U.P. Singh, Sr. Adv. and; Rajiv Rajan, Adv.
P.K. Balasubramanyan, C.J. 1. The Bokaro Steel Ltd. was incorporated in the year 1961 under Section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956 for establishing a steel plant in the undivided State of Bihar. A large number...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Bank of India and Others Vs. State Bank of India Canteen Employe ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-17-2000
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10 and 25K; State Bank of India Act, 1955 - Sections 50; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 46
[2000(85)FLR653]; JT2000(5)SC63; (2000)ILLJ1441SC; 2000(3)SCALE290; (2000)5SCC531; (2000)2UPLBEC1703
ORDER1. Leave granted, in SLP (Civil) No. 7229 of 1999 which is filed against the Award dated 7th October,1998 passed by Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Calcutta in Reference No. 2of 1992.2. Civil Appeal Nos. 552-553 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPhool Badan Tiwari and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-03-2003
Service
AIR2003SC2353; [2003(97)FLR628]; [2003(3)JCR51(SC)]; (2003)IILLJ739SC; 2003(3)SCALE746; (2003)9SCC304; [2003]3SCR386; 2003(3)SLJ306(SC)
Mukul Rohatgi, Additional Solicitor General, ; S. Wasim A. Quadri and ;
ORDER1. The appellants before us in this appeal, have called in question the validity and correctness of the order dated 13.1.2000 passed by the High Court in CWP No. 6654/99. The appellants in the first instance...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTransport and Dock Workers Union Vs. Union of India and ors.
Mumbai
Aug-25-1994
Labour and Industrial
Contract Labour Act - Sections 10(2)
[1995(70)FLR193]
1. The petitioner which is a trade union have filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for a declaration that the canteen workers employed through respondent Nos. 4 to 15 be treated as regular...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalwant Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
May-26-2000
Service
2000VIIAD(Delhi)1; 2000(55)DRJ22
Mr. Ashok Bhasin and ; Mr. Neeraj Kaul, Advs.
ORDERA.K. Sikri, J.1. There are canteens in Parliament House and Parliament House Annexe and petitioners are working in these canteens. They are the employees of these canteens on casual basis which are being run by Canteen...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHindustan Machine Tools Employees Union Vs. Hindustan Machine Tools Lt ...
Rajasthan
May-03-1995
Labour and Industrial
Cooperative Societies Act
(1997)IIILLJ610Raj; 1995(2)WLN507
Virendra Bandhu and; D.P. Gupta, Advs.
V.K. Singhal, J.1. This judgment shall dispose of all the above writ petitions as the point involved is common in all these writ petitions, namely, whether the employees of the canteen could be considered the employees...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »