Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: m r khan · Page 1 of about 100 results (0.226 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 12 2013

Indian Nval Canteen Service Employees Un Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-12-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE THURSDAY, THE12H DAY OF SEPTEMBER201321ST BHADRA, 1935 WP(C).No. 32100 of 2011 (J) --------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. INDIAN NAVAL CANTEEN SERVICE EMPLOYEES' UNION (REG.NO.07-62...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 2001

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. and ors. Vs. Umesh Korga Bhandari and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-09-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10(1) and 25F; Constitution of India - Article 309; Department Canteen Employees Rules, 1980

Reported in : [2001(90)FLR713]; (2001)IILLJ157Bom

Advocate for Respondent : N.D. Buch, Adv.

1. All these three appeals can be disposed of by this common Judgment since the point involved is the same. In addition, Writ Petitions, out of which these L.P.As. arise, were disposed of by the learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2005

Oil and Natural Gas Commission Vs. Petroleum Employees Union and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-29-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 46; Contract Labour (Regulations and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 10, 10(1) and 10(2); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 3(13); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2006(2)BomCR574

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Pakale, Adv. for respondent No. 1

Lodha R.M., J.1. Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Limited (for short the Corporation*) is in appeal aggrieved by the order of the learned Single Judge dated January 13,1997 whereby the Corporation has been directed to absorb...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 17 2001

Steel Plant Canteen Employees Union, Visakhapatnam and Others Vs. Chai ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-17-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 46 and 65; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 9, 10, 12, 23 and 25; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226; Companies Act, 1956; Andhra Pradesh Factories Rules, 1950 - Rule 66

Reported in : 2001(1)ALD537; 2001(1)ALT665

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. V. Ravinder Rao, ;Mr. V. Hariharan, Advs.

1. These two writ petitions can be disposed of by this common judgment as the issue involved is to treat the petitioners in both the writ petitions as the regular employees of the respondent viz., Visakhapatnam...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 2003

Bokaro Ispat Kamgar Union Vs. the Chairman, Sail Ispat Bhawan and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-07-2003

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Bihar Co-operative Societies Act, 1935 - Sections 14

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR663(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : U.P. Singh, Sr. Adv. and; Rajiv Rajan, Adv.

P.K. Balasubramanyan, C.J. 1. The Bokaro Steel Ltd. was incorporated in the year 1961 under Section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956 for establishing a steel plant in the undivided State of Bihar. A large number...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2000

State Bank of India and Others Vs. State Bank of India Canteen Employe ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-17-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10 and 25K; State Bank of India Act, 1955 - Sections 50; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 46

Reported in : [2000(85)FLR653]; JT2000(5)SC63; (2000)ILLJ1441SC; 2000(3)SCALE290; (2000)5SCC531; (2000)2UPLBEC1703

ORDER1. Leave granted, in SLP (Civil) No. 7229 of 1999 which is filed against the Award dated 7th October,1998 passed by Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Calcutta in Reference No. 2of 1992.2. Civil Appeal Nos. 552-553 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 2003

Phool Badan Tiwari and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-03-2003

Subject : Service

Reported in : AIR2003SC2353; [2003(97)FLR628]; [2003(3)JCR51(SC)]; (2003)IILLJ739SC; 2003(3)SCALE746; (2003)9SCC304; [2003]3SCR386; 2003(3)SLJ306(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Mukul Rohatgi, Additional Solicitor General, ; S. Wasim A. Quadri and ;

ORDER1. The appellants before us in this appeal, have called in question the validity and correctness of the order dated 13.1.2000 passed by the High Court in CWP No. 6654/99. The appellants in the first instance...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 1994

Transport and Dock Workers Union Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-25-1994

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Contract Labour Act - Sections 10(2)

Reported in : [1995(70)FLR193]

1. The petitioner which is a trade union have filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for a declaration that the canteen workers employed through respondent Nos. 4 to 15 be treated as regular...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 2000

Balwant Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-26-2000

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2000VIIAD(Delhi)1; 2000(55)DRJ22

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ashok Bhasin and ; Mr. Neeraj Kaul, Advs.

ORDERA.K. Sikri, J.1. There are canteens in Parliament House and Parliament House Annexe and petitioners are working in these canteens. They are the employees of these canteens on casual basis which are being run by Canteen...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 1995

Hindustan Machine Tools Employees Union Vs. Hindustan Machine Tools Lt ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-03-1995

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Cooperative Societies Act

Reported in : (1997)IIILLJ610Raj; 1995(2)WLN507

Advocate for Respondent : Virendra Bandhu and; D.P. Gupta, Advs.

V.K. Singhal, J.1. This judgment shall dispose of all the above writ petitions as the point involved is common in all these writ petitions, namely, whether the employees of the canteen could be considered the employees...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial