Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: m p singh and · Page 1 of about 900 results (0.543 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 05 2004

Shobh Nath and anr. Vs. District Manager, Food Corporation of India an ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-05-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : [2004(102)FLR659]; (2004)3UPLBEC2381

Advocate for Respondent : M.P. Singh, ;N.P. Singh and ;V.K. Agarwal, Advs.

Vineet Saran, J.1. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 14.6.2002 passed by Senior Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, Lucknow, Respondent No. 2, whereby the application of Petitioner No. 2 Jai Ram for appointment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2004

Hina Negi (Km.) Vs. the Registrar, C.P.M.T. 2004 (Uttar Pradesh) Chaud ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-16-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 1997 - Regulation 6A

Reported in : 2005(1)ESC667; (2005)1UPLBEC432

Advocate for Respondent : Anurag Khanna, ;M.P. Singh, ;Piyush Shukla, Advs. and ;S.C.

Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri R.J. Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri Anurag Khanna, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 1, Sri M.P. Singh, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 4, and Sri Piyush Shukla,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 2014

M.P. Singh Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-23-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Aashaa Tiwari

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.81 of 2008 M.P. SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.B. Andley, Senior Advocate with Mr. M.L. Yadav and Mr. Lokesh Chandra, Advocates. Versus STATE ..... Respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 31 1994

Mohan Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-31-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 3, 4 and 12; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 323 and 452; Scheduled Caste/Schedules Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 1994CriLJ2229; 1994(1)WLN561

B.R. Arora, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 7-3-94, passed by the Judge, Special Court, S. C./ S. T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Jodhpur, by which the learned Judge of the Special...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 2014

Bharatiya Kamgar Sena Vs. Otis Elevator Employees Union and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-09-2014

Subject : MRTP

S.J. Vazifdar, J. 1. The petitioner and the first respondent are registered under the Trade Union Act, 1926. Respondent No.2 is the Otis Elevator Company (India) Limited, Western Region, which is one of the undertakings of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2022

Pappu Tiwary Vs. State Of Jharkhand

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-31-2022

Subject : Criminal

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1492 OF2021PAPPU TIWARY …Appellant Versus STATE OF JHARKHAND …Respondent CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1202-1203 OF2014LAW TIWARI @ UPENDRA KUMAR TIWARI … Appellant Versus THE STATE OF...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2001

Paras Ram Suthar Vs. Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-05-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Rajasthan High Court (Conditions of Service of Staff) Rules, 1953 - Rules 2-B, 17 and 28

Reported in : 2001(2)WLC597; 2001(2)WLN250

Advocate for Respondent : Sangeet Lodha and; Govind Mathur, Advs.

ORDERLakshmanan, C.J. (1). Heard Mr. M.R. Singhvi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sangeet Lodha, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 and 2 and Mr. Govind Mathur for responden! No. 4.(2). This writ petition has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2011

Surinder Kumar Grover Vs. State and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-24-2011

Subject : Property

Acts : Evidence Act - Section 68;Indian Succession Act - Section 63

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Adv.

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed Yes to see the judgment?2. To be referred to Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes1. The short point...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 2013

Satya Prakash Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-11-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

dev satya Digitally signed by dev satya DN: c=IN, o=delhi high court, ou=delhi high court, postalCode=110003, st=delhi, cn=dev satya Date:2013. 11.01 12:54:35 +05'30' $~17-18, 20-28, 30-85 & 125 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 2015

Sunil Alag Vs. Union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-28-2015

Subject : Right to Information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:21. 11.2014 Pronounced on:28. 05.2015 + W.P.(C) 8152/2013 + W.P.(C) 8156/2013 SUNIL ALAG ………………Petitioner Through: Sh. Arun Bhardwaj and Sh. Piyush Gaur, Advocates. Versus UNION...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial