Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: m n ingely · Page 1 of about 2 results (0.159 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 06 1979

Dagadu Vs. Ramji and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-06-1979

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 23, 41, 43, 46, 48, 49-A, 49-B, 91, 97, 97(2), 98, 100, 100(2), 101, 102 and 125; Constitution of India - Article 227; Mamlatadar's Courts Act, 1906 - Sections 7 and 36

Reported in : AIR1981Bom323; 1980MhLJ472

Advocate for Respondent : M.N. Ingely,;A.R. Ingely and;N.G. Solao, Advs.

ORDER1. The material question that arises for consideration in this petition is whether the Agricultural Lands Tribunal while exercising the powers conferred upon it by Section 98 of the (hereinafter referred to as the Vidarbha Tenancy...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 1987

Gayabai Wife of Lalji Lautkar and ors. Vs. Wamanrao Mahadeo Nikam and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-29-1987

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarba Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 6 and 8(2)

Reported in : 1989(1)BomCR279

Advocate for Respondent : C.G. Madkholkar, Adv. for respondent No. 2, ;N.G. Solao, Adv. for respondent Nos. 1(a) to (h), ;M.N. Ingley, Adv. for respondents in W.P. No. 1586/1982, ;M.N. Ingely, ;N.G. Solao, ;N.G. Solao and ;M.N

H.W. Dhabe, J.1. These are three writ petitions which can be conveniently disposed of by this common judgment. Various protractory proceeding have taken place between the parties in these writ petitions. However, the principal question which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial