Advanced Search Results
State of U.P. Vs. Indra Singh and Others
Allahabad
May-11-2001
Service Constitution
Indian Forest Services (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1966 - Regulation 5 and 5(1); Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh (Promotion by Selection in Consultation with Public Service Commission Procedure) Rules, 1970 - Rule 9; Indian Administrative Service (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955; I.P.S. (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955 - Regulation 5
2001LabIC4031; (2001)2UPLBEC1467
H.R. Mishra, ;K.M. Mishra, ;Sudhir Agarwal and ;A.R. Masoodi, Advs.
ORDERS.R. Singh, J. 1. These writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seek quashing of the Judgment and order dated 10.9.1997 rendered by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad in three connected...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBokaro Ispat Operative Sangh Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd. and ors ...
Jharkhand
Dec-12-2003
Service
Service Law; Service Rules; Constitution of India - Article 226
[2004(1)JCR396(Jhr)]
G.M. Mishra and; Indrajeet Sinha, Advs.
ORDERR.K. Merathia, J.1. Heard Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. G. M. Mishra, learned counsel for the respondents.2. Learned, counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is a Registered Trade Union...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbid Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Allahabad
May-09-2000
Criminal
National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3(2), 3(4), 3(5), 5A and 8; Narcotic Drugs Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 18 and 20; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307 and 364
2000CriLJ3910
A.K. Tripathi, A.G.A. and ;S.M. Mishra, Adv.
R.R.K. Trivedi, J.1. In both the aforesaid writ petitions, questions of fact and law involved are similar and they can be decided by a common judgment against which learned counsel for the parties have no objection...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Smt. Satyabhama Nayak Vs. Narendra Kumar Nayak
Orissa
Aug-23-1996
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13-B
AIR1997Ori47
K.M. Mishra and ;S. Chakravarty, Advs.
Pasayat, J.1. Marriages are made in heaven, it is said. But, looking at the large number of litigations coming to Courts seeking judicial separation, divorce, grant of maintenance what comes to mind is Shakespeare's words in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFazal Ahmed Vs. K. N. Jain
Allahabad
Jan-19-2000
Tenancy
U. P. Urban Building (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 2, 13 and 20 (2A); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106, 111 and 114; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 16, 32 (2) and 114 - Order 5, Rule 19A - Order 5, Rule 19A(2); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 27
2000(2)AWC1206
M. Mishra, Adv.
D. K. Seth, J. 1. Leave is granted to amend the cause title and the preamble.2. S.C.C. Case No. 7 of 1999 was filed by the plaintiff-opposite party for eviction of the petitioner-defendant before the learned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSaud Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
May-09-2000
Criminal
National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3(2), 3(4), 3(5), 8 and 12(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 395 and 397; Constitution of India - Article 226
2001CriLJ309
A.K. Tripathi, ;S.M. Mishra, Advs. and A.G.A.
R.R.K. Trivedi, J.1. This writ petition has been filed challenging order dated 25th June, 1999, passed by respondent No. 2 District Magistrate, Aligarh under Section 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980, hereinafter referred to as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVishnu Sharan and ors. Vs. Ajuddhibai and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
May-07-2004
Property
Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 117 and 158; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 102 and 103
AIR2004MP250; 2004(3)MPHT193; 2004(3)MPLJ25
K.M. Mishra, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 7 and ;J.P. Sharma, Panel Lawyer for Respondent No. 8
A.K. Shrivastava, J.1. The defendants have preferred this appeal against judgment and decree passed by Appellate Court affirming the judgment and decree of learned Trial Court decreeing the suit for the plaintiffs for declaration, injunction and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBank of India Vs. Tata Iron and Steel Company Ltd. and ors. and Bihar ...
Jharkhand
Aug-10-2005
CivilCompany
Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 17, 19, 19(4), 19(7), 20, 25 and 28; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 20(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 442, 446, 446(1), 456, 529A and 537; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227, 323A and 323B
II(2006)BC183; [2005(4)JCR346(Jhr)]
G.M. Mishra and; Rajesh Kumar, Advs.
Altamas Kabir, C.J.1. These appeals arise out of a common judgment and order passed by a learned Single Judge while disposing of the two writ applications filed by the Tata Iron & Steel Company Limited (Tisco)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEtawah Kshetriya GramIn Bank Vs. Presiding Officer, Central Government ...
Allahabad
Aug-04-2003
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25; Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957 - Rule 10B
2003(4)AWC2836
V.K. Jaiswal, ;K.M. Mishra, ;V.K. Agnthotry, Advs., ;U.N. Sharma, S.S.C. and ;S.C.
Rakesh Tiwari, J.1. Heard the counsel for the parties and perused the record.2. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition challenging the award dated 3.7.1997 published on 16.8.1997, Annexure-1 to the writ petition. The petitioner-Bank...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMayadhar Mallik Vs. Smt. Laxmi Mallik and ors.
Orissa
Oct-23-1998
Civil
Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 7, 7(1), 8, 10, 18(2) and 18(3)
AIR2002Ori5; 1999(I)OLR37
K.M. Mishra, S. Choudhury and B.K. Sahu
P.K. Mohanty, J.1. The impugned order of the learned Sub-Judge, Jaipur refusing to transfer the proceeding to Family Court, confirmed by the learned Additional District Judge, is under challenge in this writ petition.2. The short fact...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »