Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: m m prasad · Page 1 of about 34 results (0.175 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 07 2006

Sadhu Sharan Prasad Bhagat and Mohan Prasad Bhagat Vs. the State of Bi ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Apr-07-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : C.N.T. Act - Sections 46 and 71A

Reported in : [2006(3)JCR228(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : M.M. Prasad, Adv. for Respondent No. 4

R.K. Merathiha, J.1. Petitioners have challenged the orders dated 12.7.1988, passed by respondent No. 3, in Eviction Appeal No. XV/10 of 1987-88 (Annexure-11) and Eviction Appeal No. XV/11 of 1987-88 (Annexure-11A), whereby it is ordered that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2003

Nawal Kishore Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Feb-28-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Service Law

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR160(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : M.M. Prasad, Adv.

ORDERTapen Sen, J. 1. In this Writ Application the petitioners have prayed for quashing the orders dated 24.8.1995 dismissing the appeals filed by the petitioners, thereby confirming the order of punishment. The petitioners have also made...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 2002

Sajjan Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Dec-11-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2003(1)JCR522(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : M.M. Prasad, Adv.

ORDERTapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr. V. Shivnath, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.M. Prasad, learned counsel for the respondents.2. The petitioner, a constable of the Central Industrial Security Force, Unit Bokaro Steel Plant was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 03 1986

Dara Gaddi Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-03-1986

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1986)4SCC564

P.N. Bhagwati and; Ranganath Misra, JJ.1. Since we are not allowing the special leave petition, we would not have ordinarily said anything beyond passing the order, but there are peculiar circumstances in the present case which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2003

Ram Pravesh Sharma Vs. Coal Mines Provident Fund Organisation and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-08-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 - Rules 2, 11, 12, 13 and 14; Coal Mines Provident Fund (Staff and Condition of Service) Regulations, 1964 - Regulations 6, 26 and 27; Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 - Rule 20; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR438(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : M.M. Prasad, Adv.

Tapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr. V. Shivnath, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.M. Prasad, learned counsel for the respondents.2. In the instant case, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 15.6.1995 which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 2003

Ram Mohan Nath Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Aug-18-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2003(4)JCR432(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : M.M. Prasad, Adv.

M.Y. Eqbal, J. 1. The petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing the order of punishment passed by the respondents as Disciplinary Authority as also the appellate authority whereby the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 2003

Sanjeev Kumar Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-24-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2004(2)JCR367(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : M.M. Prasad, Adv.

Tapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr. M.M. Bannerjea, learned counsel for the Petitioner assisted by Mr. Jitendra Shanker Singh and Mr. M.M. Prasad, learned counsel for the Respondents.2. The Petitioner is aggrieved by Annexures 1, 2 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 2003

Employers in Relation to the Management of N.E. Railway Vs. Presiding ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Sep-25-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10 and 25B(2); Constitution of India - Article 226; Administrative Tribunal Act

Reported in : [2004(102)FLR361]; [2004(2)JCR262(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : M.M. Prasad, Adv. for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 6

ORDERTapen Sen, J.1. The petitioner (Management of North Eastern Railways) have filed the instant writ application challenging the award passed on 29.03.2001 by the learned Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1 at Dhanbad in reference Case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 2005

Employers in Relation to the Management of North Eastern Railway, Now ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-18-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F

Reported in : [2005(3)JCR443(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : M.M. Prasad, Adv.

ORDER1. In keeping with the direction given on the last occasion, the records of Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1 at Dhanbad in Reference No. 91 of 1993 have been made available. From the said records...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 18 2000

The Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jul-18-2000

Subject : Excise

S.K. Katriar, J.1. Both these appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment The plaintiff is the appellant, and parties shall be described by this position in the trial Court.2. First...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial