Advanced Search Results
Sadhu Sharan Prasad Bhagat and Mohan Prasad Bhagat Vs. the State of Bi ...
Jharkhand
Apr-07-2006
Property
C.N.T. Act - Sections 46 and 71A
[2006(3)JCR228(Jhr)]
M.M. Prasad, Adv. for Respondent No. 4
R.K. Merathiha, J.1. Petitioners have challenged the orders dated 12.7.1988, passed by respondent No. 3, in Eviction Appeal No. XV/10 of 1987-88 (Annexure-11) and Eviction Appeal No. XV/11 of 1987-88 (Annexure-11A), whereby it is ordered that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNawal Kishore Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Jharkhand
Feb-28-2003
Service
Constitution of India - Article 226; Service Law
[2003(2)JCR160(Jhr)]
M.M. Prasad, Adv.
ORDERTapen Sen, J. 1. In this Writ Application the petitioners have prayed for quashing the orders dated 24.8.1995 dismissing the appeals filed by the petitioners, thereby confirming the order of punishment. The petitioners have also made...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSajjan Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Jharkhand
Dec-11-2002
Service
Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226
[2003(1)JCR522(Jhr)]
M.M. Prasad, Adv.
ORDERTapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr. V. Shivnath, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.M. Prasad, learned counsel for the respondents.2. The petitioner, a constable of the Central Industrial Security Force, Unit Bokaro Steel Plant was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dara Gaddi Vs. State of Bihar
Supreme Court of India
Sep-03-1986
Criminal
(1986)4SCC564
P.N. Bhagwati and; Ranganath Misra, JJ.1. Since we are not allowing the special leave petition, we would not have ordinarily said anything beyond passing the order, but there are peculiar circumstances in the present case which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Pravesh Sharma Vs. Coal Mines Provident Fund Organisation and ors.
Jharkhand
Jul-08-2003
Service
Service Law; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 - Rules 2, 11, 12, 13 and 14; Coal Mines Provident Fund (Staff and Condition of Service) Regulations, 1964 - Regulations 6, 26 and 27; Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 - Rule 20; Constitution of India - Article 226
[2003(3)JCR438(Jhr)]
M.M. Prasad, Adv.
Tapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr. V. Shivnath, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.M. Prasad, learned counsel for the respondents.2. In the instant case, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 15.6.1995 which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Mohan Nath Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Jharkhand
Aug-18-2003
Service
Service Law; ;Constitution of India - Article 226
[2003(4)JCR432(Jhr)]
M.M. Prasad, Adv.
M.Y. Eqbal, J. 1. The petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing the order of punishment passed by the respondents as Disciplinary Authority as also the appellate authority whereby the petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjeev Kumar Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Jharkhand
Jul-24-2003
Service
Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226
[2004(2)JCR367(Jhr)]
M.M. Prasad, Adv.
Tapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr. M.M. Bannerjea, learned counsel for the Petitioner assisted by Mr. Jitendra Shanker Singh and Mr. M.M. Prasad, learned counsel for the Respondents.2. The Petitioner is aggrieved by Annexures 1, 2 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmployers in Relation to the Management of N.E. Railway Vs. Presiding ...
Jharkhand
Sep-25-2003
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10 and 25B(2); Constitution of India - Article 226; Administrative Tribunal Act
[2004(102)FLR361]; [2004(2)JCR262(Jhr)]
M.M. Prasad, Adv. for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 6
ORDERTapen Sen, J.1. The petitioner (Management of North Eastern Railways) have filed the instant writ application challenging the award passed on 29.03.2001 by the learned Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1 at Dhanbad in reference Case...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmployers in Relation to the Management of North Eastern Railway, Now ...
Jharkhand
May-18-2005
Service
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F
[2005(3)JCR443(Jhr)]
M.M. Prasad, Adv.
ORDER1. In keeping with the direction given on the last occasion, the records of Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1 at Dhanbad in Reference No. 91 of 1993 have been made available. From the said records...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Patna
Jul-18-2000
Excise
S.K. Katriar, J.1. Both these appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment The plaintiff is the appellant, and parties shall be described by this position in the trial Court.2. First...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »