Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: m l sarin and · Page 1 of about 567 results (0.137 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 12 1999

Punjab State Electricity Board Vs. Indure Limited

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-12-1999

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : (2000)124PLR4

Advocate for Respondent : Sh. M.L. Sarin, Sr. Adv. and; Hemani Sarin, Adv.

N.K. Agrawal, J.1. This is a petition by the Punjab State Electricity Board (for short, the Board) under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking the removal of respondent No. 2 Shri J. S. Grewal, as the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2004

In Re: Swift Formulations Private Limited

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-31-2004

Subject : CompanyCivil

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391(2)

Reported in : [2004]121CompCas27(P& H); (2004)3CompLJ280(P& H); [2004]53SCL433(Punj& Har)

Advocate for Respondent : M.L. Sarin, Adv. and; Jaishree Thakur, amicus curiae

N.K. Sud, J.1. In this reference, we are called upon to interpret Sub-section (2) of Section 391 of the Companies Act 1956 (for short 'the Act') and determine its true meaning and import. This provision reads...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 2005

Hy. Govt. College Teachers Vs. Election Commission of India Etc.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-25-2005

Subject : ElectionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : (2005)140PLR396

Advocate for Respondent : M.L. Sarin, Sr. Adv.,; Hemant Sarin, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 and;

B.K. Roy, C.J.1. The petitioner, Haryana Government College Teachers Association, has moved this Court for issuance of a writ in the nature of prohibition restraining Respondent No. 1 and 3 from appointing the Lecturers working in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 16 1996

Punjab Wakf Board Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-16-1996

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80 - Order 23, Rule 1; Muslim Law

Reported in : (1997)116PLR215

Advocate for Respondent : M.L. Sarin, Sr. Adv. and; Alka Sarin, Adv.

ORDERR.L. Anand, J.1. Punjab Wakf Board, Ambala Cantt. (hereinafter called the Board), has filed the present writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India against the State of Punjab, The Custodian General of Evacuee...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 2004

Tikkan Lal Batta (Deceased by Lrs) and ors. Vs. Ashok Kumar and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-17-2004

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; Punjab Courts Act, 1980 - Sections 41; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 100

Reported in : AIR2005P& H145

Advocate for Respondent : M.L. Sarin, Sr. Counsel and; Alka Sarin, Adv.

Viney Mittal, J.1. This judgment shall dispose of two regular second appeals bearing R.S.A. No. 2857 of 1980 and R.S.A. No. 2958 of 1980, as both the aforesaid appeals arise out of a common judgment and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 23 2002

Hari Singh Vs. Lord Shiva (idol) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-23-2002

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 92

Reported in : (2003)134PLR18

Advocate for Respondent : M.L. Sarin, Senior Adv. and; Yogesh Dutt, Adv.

Viney Mittal, J. 1. The present first appeal has been filed bydefendant Hari Singh against whom a suit under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'the Code') filed by the plaintiff-respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 1995

The Faridabad Complex Administration Vs. the Commissioner and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-10-1995

Subject : Municipal TaxProperty

Acts : Faridabad Complex (Regulations and Development) Act, 1971 - Sections 78

Reported in : (1996)112PLR352

Advocate for Respondent : M.L. Sarin, Sr. Adv. and; Rahul Rathore, Adv. for the Resp. No. 3

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. The petitioner has challenged the order (Annexure P-5) dated 30.5.1980 passed by the Commissioner, Ambala Division, Ambala, whereby he quashed the order passed by the Administrator, Faridabad Complex Administration, Faridabad assessing the property...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 1994

Gian Chand Vs. Balbir Kumar Etc.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-10-1994

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 22, Rule 2A and 2B - Order 47, Rule 1

Reported in : (1994)107PLR240

Advocate for Respondent : M.L. Sarin, Sr. Adv. and; Alka Sarin, Adv.

Harjit Singh Bedi, J.1. The present Civil Miscellaneous Application has been filed Under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, at the instance of the tenant, for setting aside of the judgment passed in Civil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 28 1993

Sohan Lal Vs. Financial Commissioner (Appeals), Punjab at Chandigarh a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-28-1993

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1994P& H30

Advocate for Respondent : M.L. Sarin, Sr. Adv. and; Ms. Alka Sarin, Adv.

ORDER1. The dispute between the two brothers (the petitioner and respondent No. 4) is over a trifle. It relates to the partition of a piece of land. The claim of the petitioner has been rejected by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2006

Kaluta (Deceased) Through His Son and ors. Vs. Greater Ashoka Land and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-04-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11, 91, 92 and 100 - Order 1, Rule 8 - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 23, Rules 3B and 30

Reported in : (2006)142PLR734

Advocate for Respondent : M.L. Sarin, Sr. Adv. and; Sahil Sharma, Adv.

M.M. Kumar, J.1. This is plaintiffs appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity 'the Code') challenging concurrent findings of fact recorded by both the Courts below holding that the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial