Advanced Search Results

inder Chand Vs. Smt. Lilawati

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 - Sections 13(1), 13(5) and 22

Reported in : AIR1991Raj131; 1990(2)WLN385; 1990WLN(UC)163

Advocate for Respondent : M.L. Chhangani, Adv.

ORDERN.K. Jain, J. 1. This revision petition is directed against the order of learned Addl. Munsif and Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Jodhpur dated 7-11-1987. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff non-petitioner has...

Hardev Vs. Jaidev

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100; Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 13 and 13(1); Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 8

Reported in : AIR2000Raj142; 2000(1)WLC675

Advocate for Respondent : M.L. Chhangani, Adv.

R.R. Yadav, J.1. The tenant-defendant-appellant has filed the present second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 28-1-1986 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge No. 4, Jodhpur whereby he affirmed the judgment and decree of eviction...

Babu Lal Vs. Smt. Raj Kumari and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Tenancy

Vineet Kothari, J.1. This second appeal is directed against the concurrent findings of second default of the two courts below against the present defendant-appellant Babulal. The learned Addl. District Judge No. 3, Jodhpur, the first appellate...

Lal Chand Vs. Chuhar Mal

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1978WLN(UC)349

K.D. Sharma, J.1. Heard Mr. I.C. Maloo, learned Counsel for the petitioner & Mr. M.L. Chhangani, appearing on behalf of the non-petitioner and perused the record of the trial court. Upon perusal of the record, it...

Prem Raj Vs. Jeth Mal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Reported in : 1980WLN(UC)424

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. M.S. Narain Bhatta

S.K. Mal Lodha, J.1. Against the judgment and decree dated March 3, 1970 of the Civil Judge, Jodhpur, the defendant has filed this appeal which arises out of a suit for possession and injunction.2.The plaintiff-respondents instituted...

Moolraj Vs. Gulab Singh

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : 1982WLN588

M.C. Jain, J.1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 7-7-1982 passed by the Additional Munsif No. 2, Jodhpur, whereby he rejected the petitioner's application under Order 7, Rule 11, C.P.C.2. The material facts,...

Hiralal Sharma Vs. Railway Shramik Sahkari Bank Bikaner Ltd. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Contempt of Court

Reported in : 1983WLN(UC)301

S.C. Agarwal, J.1. Hiralal Sharma, the petitioner in this petition filed Under Section 12 of the Contempt of Court Act. 1977 was an employee of the Railway Shramik Sahkari Bank Bikaner Limited, Bikaner (hereinafter referred to...

Narenra Kumar Vs. Shyam Sunder and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 96 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B.CIVIL MISC.APPEAL NO.2426/2012 Shri Narendra Kumar Vs. Shri Shyam Sunder & Anr. Date of Judgment ::03. 12.2012 HONBLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR Mr.M.L.Chhangani, for the...

Sudesh Kumar Vs. Mool Chand

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Rajasthan Stamp Law (Adaptation) Act, 1952 - Schedule - Article 57; Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(5) - Schedule - Article 35; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1969Raj22

Advocate for Respondent : M.L. Chhangani, Adv.

ORDERC.M. Lodha, J.1. This is a revision application directed against the order of the learned Civil Judge, Jodhpur, dated 16-8-1967, in Civil Original Suit No. 2/1966, by which he decided preliminary issues Nos. 4 and 5...

Chander Singh Vs. Chottulal

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 17, Rule 1 - Order 18, Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1994Raj186; 1994(1)WLC493; 1994(1)WLN31

Advocate for Respondent : M.L. Chhangani, Adv.

ORDER1. This revision petition has been filed against the order of the Additional Munsif No. 2, Jodhpur dated November 9, 1993 by which he has closed the evidence of the defendant-petitioner and has fixed the case...