Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: m kumar · Page 1 of about 4,404 results (0.406 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 12 2008

Regent Automobiles Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Limited and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-12-2008

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : 2008(4)ARBLR262(P& H); (2008)152PLR159

M.M. Kumar, J.1. This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution prays for quashing letter dated 19.11.2007 (P-10), whereby the Maintenance and handling contract entered into between the parties has been terminated and operation of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 2003

Raveendra S. Karadi and anr. Vs. the Karnataka Forest Development Corp ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-29-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Karnataka Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1982 - Rule 4; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(2)KarLJ189

Advocate for Respondent : M. Kumar, Adv.

S.R. Nayak, J.1. The writ petitioners being aggrieved by the order of the learned Single Judge, dated 12th January, 2000 in W.P. Nos. 11393 and 11394 of 1998 have preferred these writ appeals. In the above...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 1998

Paramjit Rai Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jun-30-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 16

Reported in : (1998)120PLR41

Advocate for Respondent : M.M. Kumar, Adv.

N.K. Sodhi, J.1. The petitioner Shri Paramjit Rai was directly recruited as an Assistant Engineer in August, 1978 in the Punjab State Tubewell Corporation Limited (for short the corporation). He was promoted to the post of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 24 2004

O.P. Sarwal Vs. Chandigarh Housing Board

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-24-2004

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952; Chandigarh Housing Board (Allotment, Management and Sale of Tenement) Regulation, 1979

Reported in : AIR2005P& H91; (2005)139PLR517

Advocate for Respondent : Naresh Parbhakar, Adv.

M.M. Kumar, J.1. The petitioner who is a senior citizen invoked Article 226 of the Constitution praying for quashing order Annexures P-7 dated 14.12.1993, P-11 dated 9.1.1995 and P-13 dated 28.4.1995 which have resulted into cancellation...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 2006

Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices Vs. Smt. Sham Dulari and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-18-2006

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2007(2)SLJ274(P& H)

M.M. Kumar, J.1. The Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Hoshiarpur has challenged order dated 21.8.2003 (Annexure P.3) of the Controlling Authority appointed under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 whereby he has been directed to pay...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2011

M.Meena Kumari Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-24-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.Neeraj Choudhary, Adv.

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?2. To be referred to Reporter or not?3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? 1. The petitioner, who we are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2003

M.G. Umamahesh and ors. Vs. the State of Karnataka, by Its Secretary, ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-12-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Service Law

Reported in : ILR2003KAR3672

Advocate for Respondent : M. Kumar, Adv. for C/R2 & R3 and ;Srinivasa Murthy, GA for R1

ORDERDattu, J.1. Since common questions of fact and law are involved in all these Writ Petitions, they are clubbed together, heard and disposed off by this common order.2. Initially petitioners were appointed as Plantation Supervisors by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2003

Harihar Polyfibres Vs. Karnataka Forest Development Corpn. Employees U ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-12-2003

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 439; Constitution of India - Article 14; Forest Conversation Act

Reported in : ILR2004KAR825; [2003]48SCL42(Kar)

Advocate for Respondent : M. Kumar, ;M.L.N. Reddy, ;Udaya Holla and ;Nagarajulu Naidu, Advs.

1. This appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 2nd August, 1999, in Writ Petition No. 25799 of 1991. The above Writ Petition was filed by the respondents 1 and 2,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 09 2008

Gurkirpal Singh Vs. Financial Commissioner (Revenue) and Secretary, Go ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-09-2008

Subject : Property

Reported in : (2008)151PLR740

M.M. Kumar, J.1. Challenge in this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution is to notification dated 23.2.2007 (P-1) de-notifying the earlier notification issued under Section 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 01 1996

Surat Singh Engineer and anr. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-01-1996

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 5A(2)

Reported in : (1996)114PLR142

Advocate for Respondent : M.M. Kumar, Addl. Adv. Gen. for the Respts. 1 and 2 and; P.K. Mutneja, Adv.

N.K. Sodhi, J.1. Challenge in this writ petition is to the acquisition proceedings whereby the land of the petitioners has been acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, the act). The primary ground of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial