Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: m k seth · Page 1 of about 23 results (0.119 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 18 1962

Raja Deo Singh Vs. Akhtar Ahsan

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-18-1962

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 23, Rule 3; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 70

Reported in : AIR1963All438

Advocate for Respondent : M.K. Seth, Adv.

Desai, C. J.1. This is an appeal from a judgment of our brother Nigam dismissing the appellant's objection to the execution of a decree against him. The decree was a compromise decree and the relevant parts...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 2013

Seth Hotels Private Ltd Vs. Dda

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-08-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Arun Birbal, Mr. Atul Bandhu, Mr. M.K. Seth Date

15 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 865/2012 & CM Appl. Nos. 1924, 10429, 10786/2012, 5091/2013 & Crl.M.A. 7862/2013 SETH HOTELS PRIVATE LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ramesh Chandra,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 1976

Deep Chand Vs. Babu Ram

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-21-1976

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 116; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 39 and 40; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : AIR1976All478

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. Hargovind Dayal Srivastava

O.P. Trivedi, J.1. This a defendant's appeal and arises from a suit for ejectment from a shop and for damages for use and occupation which was filed against him by the respondent Babu Ram. The plaintiff-respondent's...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 19 1979

Satya Sindhu Pandey Vs. Mohammad Shual Islam and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-19-1979

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 20, Rule 12; Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 3A and 5(4)

Reported in : AIR1980All69

Advocate for Respondent : Akhilesh Sahai and ;Zaheer Hasan, Advs.

S.C. Mathur, J. 1. This appeal arises from a suit for possession and recovery of mesne profits and damages. The suit arose in the circumstances indicated hereinafter. Respondents 1 and 2 Mohammad Shuaul Islam and Smt....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 1953

Roop Kishore Tandon and ors. Vs. Braj Kishore Tandon and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-14-1953

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Debt Law; Uttar Pradesh Agriculturists' Relief Act, 1934 - Sections 2; Hindu Law; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : AIR1954All117

Advocate for Respondent : M.K. Seth, Adv. holding brief of ;K.N. Tandon, Adv.

1. These two appeals arise out of two suits but the same question is involved in both of them and they may, therefore be disposed of by this judgment.2. Appeal No. 101 of 1946 arises out...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 1973

Baljit Singh Vs. T. Ranjit Singh

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-12-1973

Subject : Civil

Acts : Court-fees Act, 1870 - Schedule - Article 17

Reported in : AIR1973All228

Advocate for Respondent : Sridhar Misra, ;M.K. Seth, ;N.K. Seth and ;K.C. Seth, Advs.

ORDERJ.M. Lal, J. 1. This is a tax reference made by the Taxing Officer of this Court relating to payment of court-fee on the memo of appeal filed in First Appeal No. 9 of 1969. 2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 1951

Sri Babu Lal Vs. B. Ganga Saran

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-03-1951

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Rent Control and Eviction Act, 1947 - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 63

Reported in : AIR1952All48

Advocate for Respondent : M.K. Seth and ;M.L. Tewari, Advs.

Agarwala, J.1. This is defendant's second appeal arising out of a suit for ejectment and recovery of arrears of rent. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant was a monthly tenant of a shop at Lucknow belonging...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 1963

L. Madan Lal Haveliwala Vs. L. Sunder Lal and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-15-1963

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14(2), 15, 16, 17 and 33; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 158

Reported in : AIR1964All38

Advocate for Respondent : B.K. Dhaon, ;M.K. Seth, ;A.P. Agarwal and ;Ram Krishna Srivastava, Advs. for Respondent No. 1 and ;H.D. Srivastava, ;N. Banerji, ;B.N. Anand, ;G.B. Lal, ;Umesh Chandra, ;M.S. Kotwal, ;A.K. Mittra and

Desai, C.J. 1. This is an appeal from an order passed by a Civil Judge making an award a rule of the Court and passing a decree in terms of it.2. The appellant and the respondents...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 1966

Abdul Aziz and anr. Vs. A. Raj Chhabra

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-29-1966

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 9, Rules 6 and 13 - Order 11, Rule 21 - Order 17, Rule 3 - Order 43, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : AIR1968All119

Advocate for Respondent : M.K. Seth, ;K.N. Kapoor, ;O.P. Agrawal and ;G.R. Chhabra, Advs.

G.D. Sahgal, J. 1. I have had theadvantage of going through the judgment prepared by my learned brother and though I agree with the ultimate order proposed to be passed in the case, I would like...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 1954

Rohan Singh Vs. Badri Prasad

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-15-1954

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 181; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 34, Rule 5

Reported in : AIR1955All254

Advocate for Respondent : M.K. Seth, Adv.

Kidwai, J.1. On 31-3-1839 a preliminary mortgage decree was passed in favour of Badri Prasad against Rohan Singh. The decree provided that the amount due was Rs. 637/11/- and then directed'the amount thus determined shall be...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial