Advanced Search Results

Vijai Pal Singh and anr. Vs. Management Committee, Pyarey Singh Purva ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Recognised Basic Schools (Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Teachers and Other Conditions) Rules, 1975 - Rule 11

Reported in : 2004(4)AWC2925

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Pandey, ; S.K. Shukla and ; R.R.K. Trivedi, Advs.

Tarun Agarwala, J.1. The plaintiffs filed a suit for a mandatory injunction restraining the defendants from interfering in their services as assistant teachers in C.T. Grade in the defendant's educational institution. The plaintiffs further prayed that...

Jawahar Singh Vs. Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-labour Co ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC658; (2004)1UPLBEC521

Advocate for Respondent : C.B. Gupta, Adv.

Anjani Kumar, J.1. The petitioner-workman, who is an employee of Canara Bank by means of present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has questioned the award of the Central Government-cum-Labour Court, Pandu...

indal Kumar Kushwaha and Rajaram Kushwaha Sons of Ramdhan and ors. Vs. ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : 2007(4)AWC4191

Pankaj Mithal, J.1. This second appeal has been preferred by the defendants of Original No. 210 of 1984 (Achchey Lal Gupta and Ors. v. Indra Kumar Kushwaha and Ors.) after the suit for specific performance of...

Om Prakash Gupta Vs. District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilTenancy

Reported in : 2010(1)AWC521

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. M.K. Nigam

Poonam Srivastav, J.1. Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Srivastava, learned Counsel for petitioner and Sri Manish Kumar Nigam, counsel for contesting respondents.2. Petitioner preferred a release application under Section 21(1)(a) of U.P. Act No. XIII of 1972...

Rajendra Prasad and ors. Vs. District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC4150

Sanjay Misra, J.1. Heard Sri M.K. Nigam learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri H.N. Singh learned Counsel appearing on behalf of contesting respondent No. 3.2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners seek to...

Dilip Kumar Sharma and anr. Vs. Civil Judge (Senior Division) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 40, Rules 1 to 5

Reported in : AIR2004All86; 2003(4)AWC3291

Advocate for Respondent : M.K. Nigam, ;V.K. Burman, ;Rahul Chaturvedi and ;H.N. Pandey, Advs.

Sunil Ambwani, J. 1. By this writ petition, Sri Dilip Kumar Sharma, claiming himself to be Secretary/ Pradhan Mantri of Committee of Management, Sri Giriraj Sewak Samiti, Bara Bazar, Goverdhan, Mathura (in short 'Society'), and Shri...

Ram Chandra Singh Vs. Mahendra Nath Gupta

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21(1), 22, 23 and 34; Limitation Act - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115 - Order 9, Rule 13; Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules - Rule 32

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC694; 2005(2)AWC1106

Advocate for Respondent : M.K. Nigam, Adv.

Anjani Kumar, J.1. By means of present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-tenant challenges the Order passed by the prescribed authority/VIIIth A.C.M.M., Kanpur Nagar in Misc. Rent Case No. 16/74...

Parshuram Son of Doodhnath Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation,

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act - Sections 9A(2), 42, 42(2) and 48; Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Rules - Rules 65(1A) and 111

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC3024

Advocate for Respondent : Rahul Sahai and ;M.K. Nigam, Advs. and ;S.C.

Krishna Murari, J.1. Heard Sri Abhishek Kumar learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rahul Sahai appearing for the respondent No. 3.2. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being...

Baleshwar Mishra Vs. Jamil Khan

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 90; Uttar Pradesh Debt Relief Act, 1977 - Sections 2(11)

Reported in : AIR2005All49; 2005(2)AWC1163

Advocate for Respondent : M.K. Nigam and ;S.K. Singh, Advs.

ORDERAnjani Kumar, J.1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the orders dated 9-3-2004 passed by the District Judge, Deoria, in Civil Revision No. Nil of 2004 and the...

Madhya Pradesh State Through Collector Vs. District Judge,

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Arbitration Act - Sections 7(2) and 34; Constitution of India - Articles 7, 7(2), 291, 362 and 363

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC4205

Advocate for Respondent : V.K. Barman, ;Pankaj Barman, ;M.K. Nigam, ;Rahul Sahai and ;J.K. Sharma, Advs. and ;S.C.

Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard. Shri R.P. Tewari on behalf of the petitioner, Shri V.K. Burman, Senior Advocate on behalf of the respondents No. 2 and 3, Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent No. 1.2. The property...