Advanced Search Results
Ramanlal Maganlal Vs. Binani Commercial Co. Ltd.
Mumbai
Aug-22-1955
Contract
Supply and Prices of Goods Act, 1950 - Sections 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 7, 10 and 14; Constitution of India - Article 249; Sale of Goods Act
AIR1958Bom15; (1957)59BOMLR1131; ILR1955Bom1089
M.J. Mistree and ;D.M. Rege, Advs.
Chagla, C.J.1. This is an appeal from a judgment of Mr, Justice Coyajee and the appeal came to be filed in the following circumstances: The plaintiffs filed a suit in respect of a contract arrived at...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSakamari Steel and Alloys Ltd. Vs. State Industrial and Investment Cor ...
Mumbai
Aug-24-1978
Property
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 65A, 69-A, 69A(1), 69-A(3) to (8), 69-A(9) and 69-A(10); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 40, Rule 1
AIR1979Bom66; (1979)81BOMLR434; 1979MhLJ733
M.J. Mistree, ;D.R. Zaiwalla, ;Manohar and ;Divekar, Advs.
ORDER1. This is a petition for the opinion, advice and directions of this Court sought under the provisions of S. 69-A of the T. P. Act, 1882.2. The petitioners carry on business as manufacturers of steel...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPhulchand Laxminarayan Vs. the India United Mills Ltd.
Mumbai
Sep-19-1960
Arbitration
Bombay Mill Owners' Association Rules - Rules 16, 18, 25, 26 and 29; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 16 and 16(1); Arbitration Act, 1899 - Sections 13
AIR1961Bom208; (1961)63BOMLR76; ILR1961Bom344
M.J. Mistree and F.S. Nariman, Advs.
Mudholkar, Ag. C.J.1. This is an appeal from the judgment of Mr. Justice Shelat refusing to set aside an award made by an umpire in certain arbitration proceedings. The facts relevant for the purpose of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Farbewerke Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft Vormals Meister Lucius and Bruni ...
Mumbai
Jul-11-1968
Intellectual Property Rights
Patents and Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 29; India Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 58, 101, 106, 114 and 115; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100 and 101
AIR1969Bom255; (1974)76BOMLR130
M.J. Mistree and ;S.P. Bharcha, Advs.
1. This is a suit for infringement of patent under Section 29 of the Indian patents and Designs Act, 1911, filed by the plaintiffs who are the legal owners and proprietors of Indian Patent No. 58716...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD.P. Dave Vs. the State of Bombay
Mumbai
Jul-09-1959
Sales Tax
Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 - Sections 34; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 2 and 2(17)
[1960]11STC137(Bom)
M.J. Mistree, Adv.
Shah, J.1. Messrs D. P. Dave, who will hereafter be referred to as 'the assessees', are carrying on business of selling drugs in the town of Ahmedabad. Under entry 4 of Schedule II of the Bombay...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSalemahomed Haji Haroon Kably Vs. Mahomed Taher Jaffrani
Mumbai
Aug-21-1957
CivilProperty
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 10
AIR1958Bom210; (1957)59BOMLR1193; ILR1958Bom306
M.J. Mistree, Adv.
Tendolkar, J. 1. This is an appeal against a judgment and order of Coyajee J., on a notice of motion whereby he refused to appoint a Receiver of certain property. The defendant is the son of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRustom K. Karanjia and anr. Vs. Krishnaraj M.D. Thackersey and ors.
Mumbai
Jul-22-1969
Media and CommunicationCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 35 - Order 41, Rules 4 and 33; Constitution of India - Article 39; Customs and Foreign Exchange Regulations
AIR1970Bom424; (1970)72BOMLR94; ILR1971Bom324; 1970MhLJ404
M.J. Mistree, ;P.P. Khambata and ;S.P. Bharucha, Advs., i/b., Mulla and Mulla and Cragie, Blunt and Caroe, Solicitors
Palekar, J.1. This appeal by defendants 1 and 2 arises out of a libel suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent No. 1, on the original side of this Court in respect of an Article published in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmirchand Narayan Vs. Divisional Officers Bombay Division and ors.
Mumbai
Jan-07-1959
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 68-C
(1959)61BOMLR1145
R.J. Joshi and ;M.J. Mistree, Advs.
(1) This is a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution to set aside the two orders copies of which have been annexed as Exs. B and C to the petition. (2) The petitioner carries on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.S. Subramanyan, Income-tax Officer, Companies Circle I (1), Bombay a ...
Mumbai
Mar-11-1959
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18A (5) and 34(1)
[1963]48ITR980(Bom)
M.J. Mistree, Adv.
Chainani, C.J. 1. This is an appeal by the Income-tax Officer, Companies Circle 1(1). Bombay, and the Union of India, against the order passed by Mr. Justice K. T. Desai, by which he set aside the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSohli F. Vakil Vs. the State of Bombay
Mumbai
Jul-09-1959
Sales Tax
Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 - Sections 18
[1960]11STC358(Bom)
M.J. Mistree, Adv.
SHAH, J.1. The assessees Messrs Sohli F. Vakil purchased on the 19th of December, 1952, a motor car which was brought on that day to Bombay by one Mohabat Rai from delhi, and delivery of that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »