Advanced Search Results
Saroj Iyer and anr. Vs. Maharashtra Medical of Indian Medicine, Bombay ...
Mumbai
Sep-04-2001
Media and CommunicationConstitution
Maharashtra Medical Council Act, 1965 - Sections 22; Maharashtra Medical Council Rules, 1967 - Rules 67 to 75
AIR2002Bom97; 2002(3)BomCR416; (2002)1BOMLR504; 2002(1)MhLj737
M.J. Jamdar and ;S.K. Nair, Advs.
1. These two writ petitions were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment as common issues are involved therein and principal prayer is identical for issuance of direction to the Maharashtra Medical...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPennar Industries Ltd. Vs. Dynamic Logistics (P.) Ltd.
Mumbai
Mar-21-2001
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433
2001(4)ALLMR757; 2001(3)BomCR735
M.J. Jamdar, Adv.
Chandrachud, J.1. In pursuance of purchase orders by the respondent, a contract was entered into between the petitioner and the respondent for the construction of warehouses. The details of the 16 purchase orders have been annexed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNeelam Narayan Bansode Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through Principle ...
Mumbai
Mar-17-2009
Constitution
Maharashtra Nurses Act, 1966 - Sections 2, 2(14), 2(14A), 2(15), 2(16), 3, 3(3), 10 and 25(5); Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994; Maharashtra Medical Council Act, 1965; Bombay Homoeopathic Practitioners' Act, 1959 - Sections 20
2009(3)BomCR108; 2009(111)BomLR1761; 2009(4)MhLj150
R.R. Salvi, Adv., i/b., S.B. Telgote, Adv. for the Respondent No. 2, ;M.J. Jamdar, Adv. for the Respondent No. 3, ;M.D. Naik, Assistant Government Pleader
Swatanter Kumar, C.J.1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent, rule called out and heard.2. The petitioner claims to be a member registered under the provisions of Maharashtra Nurses Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as `the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›