Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: m h patil · Page 1 of about 149 results (0.092 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 10 2001

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Klockner Supreme Pentaplast Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-10-2001

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35G

Reported in : 2002(79)ECC437; 2002(140)ELT370(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : M.H. Patil, ;Arun Mehata and ;Sunil Jain, Advs.

1. Shri B.C. Neema, learned Standing Counsel for the Union of India-appellant and Shri M.H. Patil along with Shri Arun Mehata and Shri Sunil Jain, learned Counsel for the respondents.2. With consent arguments were heard on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2006

The Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Panetrical Engg. Pvt. Ltd. and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-14-2006

Subject : Excise

Acts : Shop and Establishment Act; Central Excise Act - Sections 11AC; Central Excise Rules - Rules 173Q and 209A

Reported in : 2006(204)ELT397(Bom); 2006[4]STR422

Advocate for Respondent : M.H. Patil and ;Aparna Hirandagi, Advs.

ORDER1. Heard Mr. K.R. Chaudhari, the learned Counsel for the appellant and Mr. M.H. Patil, the learned Counsel for the respondents.2. The Tribunal considered the entire material and then in paragraph 2.1 recorded the finding concerning...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2008

Appollo Tyres Ltd., Represented by Its Power of Attorney, Mahesh S/O J ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-30-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 399 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 403, 407, 409, 420 and 465

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR1336; 2008CriLJ3758

Advocate for Respondent : P.G. Godhamgaonkar, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3, ;P.B. Salunke, Adv. for ;V.R. Mundada, Adv. for Respondent No. 2, ;M.H. Patil, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 7, ;S.R. Deshpande, Adv. for Resp

V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. This is an application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.2. Challenge herein is to order dated 15th January 2005 rendered by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule in Criminal Revision...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 07 2025

Nagappa S/O Kenchappa vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Apr-07-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100049 OF 2017 (397(Cr.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN:1. NAGAPPA S/O. KENCHAPPA HALAVAGALA, AGE:...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 1997

National Power Scheme Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-07-1997

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1997)(96)ELT678Tri(Mum.)bai

1. The application is for waiver of duty amount of Rs. 1,12,553/- which is demanded from the applicant as wrongly availed exemption under Notification No. 1/93 by the applicants.2. Shri M.H. Patil, the ld. Counsel for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 07 2023

Kallappa S/o Bhimappa Sutagannavar Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Jun-07-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

- 1 - CRL.RP No.100048 of 2015 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE07H DAY OF JUNE, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANIL B KATTI CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.100048 OF2015BETWEEN:...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 1993

Collector of Central Excise Vs. V.S. Engineers

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Oct-06-1993

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1994)LC96Tri(Delhi)

1. These three appeals have been filed against the order passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Bombay. The respondents are engaged in the manufacture of "Fuse Switches" of various types. They filed a classification...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 2012

The Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Castrol India Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-25-2012

Subject : Excise

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Dighe

J.P. Devedhar, J. 1) This appeal filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 ['1944 Act' for short] was admitted on 8th February, 2012 on two substantial questions of law. However, at the hearing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 2003

The Commissioner, Central Excise Vs. Bombay Neon Signs and Sign Crafts

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-14-2003

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2004)(166)ELT102Tri(Mum.)bai

1. This is a Revenue's appeal against the Commissioner of Central Excise's order dated 29.4.95. The facts are: M/s Bombay Neon Signs is a SSI unit, working under SS1 Notification 175/86 manufacturing illuminated Neon Signs (ch.9405)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 2025

Shekhappa S/O Shivabasappa Motebennur vs Rajesh S/O Ganeshappa Basavan ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Sep-24-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 103878 OF 2015 (MV-I) BETWEEN:1. SHEKHAPPA S/O SHIVABASAPPAMOTEBENNUR, AGE:...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial