Advanced Search Results

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Jaganath Shantaram Pawar Thane District

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Oral Judgment: 1. The appellant-State of Maharashtra has appealed against the Judgment and Order of acquittal passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Murbad on 29th January, 1996 in R.C.C. No. 107 of 1988 acquitting...

The State of Maharashtra and Another Vs. Sunil Vishnu Ombase and Anoth ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Oral Judgment: (A.S. Gadkari, J.) 1. Confirmation Case No.7 of 2013 arises out of the reference made by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge - 4, Solapur in Sessions Case No.145 of 2013 for confirmation of the...

Akram Ajij Shaikh Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

AbhayM. Thipsay, J. Rule. By consent, Rule made returnable forthwith. The learned APP waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent, heard finally forthwith. 2 By this writ petition, the petitioner is challenging...

Rajesh Nana Patil Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 319; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 302

Reported in : 2006CriLJ4578

Advocate for Respondent : M.H. Mhatre, APP

ORDERD.B. Bhosale, J.1. Heard Mr. Chitnis, learned senior Counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Mhatre, learned APP, for respondent No. 1.2. This petition is directed against the order dated 19th June, 2006 passed by IIIrd Ad...

Peacock Industries Ltd., Vs. Budhrani Finance Ltd. and State of Mahara ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 9, 138 to 147 and 165; Negotiable Instruments (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2002 - Sections 138, 141, 142 and 143 to 147; Evidence Act - Sections 136, 141 and 142; The Banking, Public Financial Institutions and the Negotiable Instruments Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 138 to 142 and 143 to 149 ; Constitution of India - Articles 20(3), 226 and 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 88, 204, 294, 296, 296(1), 296(2), 306, 307, 313, 315, 315(1), 316, 461 and 482

Reported in : IV(2006)BC302; 2006(5)MhLj162

Advocate for Respondent : S.R. Shinde, A.P.P. in WP Nos. 1659/05, 476/06, 1177/06, 2192/05, ;M.M. Deshmukh, A.P.P. in WP Nos. 1876/05, 1646/06 to 1665/06, ;M.H. Mhatre, A.P.P. in WP Nos. 1959/05, 314/06, 997/06, 1179/06, 1140/

D.B. Bhosale, J.1. The questions raised in this group of writ petitions are common, the fact situation against which they are raised is similar and though the parties are different they all arise from somewhat similar...

Vinod Hingorani Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : BankingCriminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 141

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR885; IV(2008)BC1; [2009]150CompCas602(Bom); 2008CriLJ2403; 2008(4)MhLj705

Advocate for Respondent : M.H. Mhatre, APP

ORDERV.K. Tahilramani, J.1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. None appears for respondent No. 2, though served. Perused the reply of respondent No. 2.2. This Application challenges an...

Manjit Singh Obhan Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138

Reported in : 2007CriLJ3865

Advocate for Respondent : M.H. Mhatre, APP

ORDERJ.H. Bhatia, J.1. Heard Mr. Rajendra Sorankar, learned Counsel for the applicant, who seeks leave to prefer an appeal against the acquittal for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.2. According to the...

Vasantkumar Jivrambhai Majithia Vs. State of Maharashtra (at the Insta ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 107, 108, 109, 110, 111 to 116, 116(1), 116(2), 116(3), 145, 147, 251, 252 and 478 to 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 323 and 504; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 227

Reported in : (2005)107BOMLR1149; 2006CriLJ1135

Advocate for Respondent : A.A. Kumbhakoni, Associate Adv. General and ;M.H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for Respondent No. 1

Abhay S. Oka, J.1. Rule. The learned A.P.P. waives service for the Respondent No. 1. Service on Respondent No. 2 is dispensed with. Taken up for hearing forthwith. I have heard the learned Counsel for the...

Barbeil Khimji Shah Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420 and 460

Reported in : 2007(6)MhLj468

Advocate for Respondent : M.H. Mhatre, APP for respondent No. 1

V.C. Daga, J.1. The applicant has invoked jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ('Cr.P.C.' for short) with a prayer to quash and set aside the complaint and proceedings...

indraprastha Holdings Ltd. Vs. Vijay J. Shah and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 to 142, 145, 145(2) and 342A; Negotiable Instruments (Amendment And Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2002 - 143 to 147; Banking, Public Financial Institutions and Negotiable Instruments Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988; Companies Act - Sections 282; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 306, 465 and 477A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1955; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 262 to 265

Reported in : 2006CriLJ574; 2006(1)MhLj101

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Chimade, Adv. For respondent No. 1 and ;M.H. Mhatre, A.P.P., Adv. For respondent No. 2

A.S. Oka, J. 1. On the 25th July, 2005 this Revision Application was taken up for final hearing and after conclusion of hearing, today it is kept for dictation of judgment.2. The question which arises for...