Advanced Search Results

Dr. Surendra Ramlal Tiwari and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Practices Act, 1966 - Section 37, 31(6), 22(c); National Institutes of Technology Act, (NIT) - Section 16(1)(d); Constitution Of India - Article 21

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Mishra, Shri. Kaptan, Shri. Bhangde

1. By this petition, the challenge is to action of Respondent No. 2 in allotting land reserved for Primary School, Secondary School and Playground to Respondent No. 4 - Educational Institution/ Trust. The petition has been...

ishwarbhai Marghabhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India

Reported in : (2000)4GLR425

Advocate for Respondent : M.G. Doshit & Co. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2

H.K. Rathod, J.1. Shri Y.N. Oza, learned Sr. Advocate is appearing for the petitioner. Shri S.N. Shelat, learned Addl. A.G. is appearing for the respondents with Shri A.D. Oza, learned Government Pleader and Shri M.G. Doshit...

Punjab State Electricity Board Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. M.G. Ramachandran

1. This appeal is preferred by the appellant, Punjab State Electricity Board (PSEB in short) against the order of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC or the Commission in short) dated February 6,2007 in petition No....

Mahadeo and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Dep ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Education

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioner teachers seek salary as per the pay scale prescribed by State Government through its resolution dated 21st May...

Mehboob Bi Vs. the Airport Authority, by Its Administrative Officer an ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : ILR2004KAR4407; 2004(7)KarLJ487

Advocate for Respondent : M.G.S. Kamal, ;Ravichandran, ;M.B. Rajashekar, Advs. for R1, ;D.O. Kotresh, Adv. for R3, ;G. Nagarajulu Naidu, AGA for R2

ORDERRam Mohan Reddy, J.1. The petitioner claims damage and loss suffered by her due to the negligence of the Officer of the State. It is the case of the petitioner that she is a permanent resident...

Bibi Ayesha Khanum Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. M.G. Kumar

- 1 - WP No.2318/2022 ® IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE23D DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. RITU RAJ AWASTHI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ...

Arun Kumar Krishnarao Balpande Vs. Wasudeorao Kondbaji Ganar and Other ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 20(3), 129 and 215; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201, 302 and 376

Reported in : 1996CriLJ1091; 1996(1)MhLj491

Advocate for Respondent : S.G. Aney, ;M.M. Agnihotri, ;S. Sanyal, ;S.P. Dhole, ;B.A. Udhoji, ;Mrs. S.M. Mudaliyar, ; Miss S.M. Muley, ;C.S. Kaptan, ;Ramesh Darda, ;M.G. Bhangade and ;V.V. Bhangade, Advs. and ;H. Ahmad, A.P.P.

L. Manoharan, J.1. By this criminal contempt petition, the petitioner seeks to invoke the suo motu jurisdiction of this Court to punish the respondent Nos. 1 and 3 to 14 for having committed criminal contempt of...

Canara Bank and Another Vs. M/S. Shimoga Steels Limited, Rep. by Its C ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. M.G. Kumar

(This writ petition is field under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, with a prayer to call for the records before the R2 and Appeal No.266/2007 before the R3 and set aside the...

In the Matter Of: U.P. Power Corporation Limited, Lucknow Vs. Central ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. M.G. Ramachandran

THE HONOURABLE MR. RAKESH NATH, TEHNICAL MEMBER    Appeal Nos. 100 of 2009, 146 of 2010 and 151 of 2010 have been filed by Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd. against the order dated 3.2.2009 of Central...

Commissioner of Central Excise and anr. Vs. Indorama Textiles Ltd. and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35E and 35EE; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(5)BomCR914; 2006(204)ELT222(Bom); 2006(4)MhLj366

Advocate for Respondent : M.G. Bhangde, Sr. Counsel for Respondent No. 1

ORDERD.D. Sinha, J.1. Heard Shri A.B. Chaudhari, the learned Assistant Solicitor General for the petitioners, and Shri M.G. Bhangde, the learned Senior Counsel for respondent No. 1.2. The present writ petition is filed against the order...