Advanced Search Results
Shyam Lal and ors. Vs. State of H.P.
Himachal Pradesh
Jan-01-2002
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (1860), - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149, 302, 304, 307, 323, 325 and 452; ;Criminal Procedeure Code , 1974 - Sections 211, 215, 218, 313, 464, 465, 535 and 537
2002CriLJ3178
M.C. Mandhotra, Addl. Advocate General
Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. Both these appeals have been filed against the judgment and order dated 30-6-2000 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Solan in Sessions trial No. 4-S/7/97. By the impugned judgment and order, out of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJeet Ram Vs. H.P. State Handicrafts and Handloom Corpn. Ltd.
Himachal Pradesh
Jan-02-1996
Labour and Industrial
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 21
(1998)IIILLJ772HP
A.K. Bansal, vice and; M.C. Mandhotra, Adv.
R.L. Khurana, J. 1. The petitioner was appointed as Peon with the Handicraft Board in the year 1972. His services were taken over by the respondent-Corporationin October, 1974. He was promoted as a Salesman on May...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLeela Devi and anr. Vs. Ram Lal Rahu and anr.
Himachal Pradesh
Nov-23-1989
Labour and Industrial
1990ACJ431
K.D. Sood and; M.C. Mandhotra, Advs.
Bhawani Singh, J.1. This appeal arises out of the order of Commissioner (under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923), Bilaspur, in Case No. 8/84-1/87; decided on 15.11.1988. By this order, the claim of the appellants for compensation,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
In Re: R.S. Gupta
Himachal Pradesh
Sep-26-1991
Contempt of Court
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 352, 356 and 500
1992CriLJ2265
M.S. Chandel, Asstt. Adv. General
Kamlesh Sharma, J. 1. This Contempt Petition was received from Sh.A.C. Thalwal, Sub Judge-cum-Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate (I), Paonta Sahib District Sirmaur, complaining that respondent, R.S. Gupta, has committed criminal contempt of his Court by refusing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKhem Singh and ors. Vs. Kapur Singh
Himachal Pradesh
Mar-25-1983
Property
Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913 - Section 4; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 114
Mehar Chand Mandhotra, Adv.
V.P. Gupta, J. 1. Aggrieved from the judgment and decree, dated 28-9-1981, passed by the District Judge, Mandi, Khem Singh (defendant 1) has filed this appeal.2. Smt. Lachhi and Smt. Balmo (de-fendants 2 and 3) daughters...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVinod Kumar Vs. Income-tax Officer and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
Sep-15-1992
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 136, 271, 271(1), 273A, 276C, 277, 278, 279(1A) and 279A; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109, 177, 193, 196 and 228; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 195, 195(1) and 195(3)
(1993)114CTR(HP)16,[1993]200ITR79(HP)
Inder Singh, Adv. for respondent No. 1,; Subh Mahajan, Adv. for respondent No. 2 and;
Kamlesh Sharma, J.1. Both these petitions (Cr. M. Ps. (M) Nos. 1023 and 1024 of 1988) are being disposed of by a common judgment as these involve identical facts and questions of law and the parties...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Mewa Devi and ors. Vs. Ram Parkash Rajinder Paul and anr.
Himachal Pradesh
Jul-11-1989
Motor VehiclesCivil
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Section 110D; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 104
1990ACJ468,AIR1990HP53
K.D. Sood, Adv.
Bhawani Singh, J.1. These appeals (FAO (MVA) 22 of 1982 Smt. Mewa Devi and Ors. v. Ram Parkash Rajinder Paul and Anr. and FAO (MVA) No. 23 of 1982 Smt. Kamla Devi & Ors. v. M/s...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaghbar Datta Pyare Lal and ors. Vs. Malka Rani and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
Sep-26-1989
Motor Vehicles
1990ACJ812
K.D. Sood,; A.K. Goel and; Rajiv Mehta, Advs.
Bhawani Singh, J. 1. These appeals, F.A.O. No. 77 of 1982; M/s. Raghbar Datta Pyare Lal v. Malka Rani and F.A.O. No. 97 of 1982; Malka Rani v. Raghbar Datta Pyare Lal, arise out of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Chander Vs. State of H.P. and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
Apr-04-2000
Labour and Industrial
(2001)ILLJ961HP
M.C. Mandhotra, AAG for Respondents Nos. 1 and 2 and; Ramakant Sharma, Adv. for Respondents No. 4
ORDERSurinder Sarup, J. 1. The petitioner has challenged the order of the State Administrative Tribunal dated June 29, 1999 vide Annexure P3, whereby his appointment as part-time Water Carrier in the Education Department has been quashed.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunish Kumar Alias Munish Gir and ors. Vs. Baghula Mukhi Devi Bankhand ...
Himachal Pradesh
Aug-06-1997
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 22, Rules 2, 3, 4 and 10
AIR1998HP1
M.C. Mandhotra and; Ramakant Sharma, Advs.
1. It is the defendant who has filed this second appeal. The parlies, herein-after in the judgment, shall be referred to as 'plaintiff and 'defendant'.2. The suit out of which this appeal has arisen, was filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »