Advanced Search Results

Brij Bhushan Lal and Sons Vs. Designated Authority

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)165CTR(All)137; [2001]246ITR353(All)

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Shambhu Chopra

M. C. Agarwal, J.By this petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges the orders dated 17-3-1999, passed by the Designated Authority, i.e., Commissioner (Appeals), Meerut (hereinafter referred to as the respondent...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kesho Ram and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2001]245ITR733(All)

M. C. Agarwal, J.By this application under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Commissioner Meerut, prays that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi, be directed to draw up a statement of the case...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Auto Sales

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2001]246ITR494(All)

M. C. Agarwal, J.These are two references under section 256 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in respect of a common assessee and relating to the assessment years 1971-72 and 1974-75.The reference in ITR No. 237...

G. Eva Mary Elezabath Vs. Jayaraj,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 19

Reported in : AIR2005Mad452

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Amarnath, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and ;E. Raja, Addl. Public Prosecutor for Respondent No. 2 and 3

ORDERM. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. G. Eva Mary Elezabath has filed this Habeas Corpus Petition, seeking for a direction, directing the respondents to produce the minor male child Samuel Rily Macon before this Court and pass suitable orders...

Kamakhya Steels (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F; Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Excise Rules - Rule 57I

Reported in : 1994LC441(Allahabad); 1994(74)ELT499(All)

Advocate for Respondent : Shishir Kumar, Adv.

ORDERM.C. Agarwal, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Shishir Kumar for the respondents.2. In view of the circumstances of this case, it is not considered necessary, nor it is insisted upon by...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sir Padampat Singhania

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2000]111TAXMAN223(All)

These are two references under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in which the Tribunal, Allahabad, has referred the following identical question of law for the opinion of this court:'Whether, on the facts and...

Udai Metals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Customs

Acts : Central Excise Act - Sections 35F; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111 and 112; Foreign Trade Development and Regulation Act, 1962 - Sections 2(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999(113)ELT49(All)

Advocate for Respondent : Surya Prakash, Standing Counsel

ORDERM.C. Agarwal, J.1. Heard Sri Ashok Trivedi, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Surya Prakash, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent.2. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against...

Saraya Sugar Mills (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2001]246ITR509(All)

At the instance of the assessee, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad, has referred the following question stated to be of law and to arise out of its order dated 28-9-1981, passed in ITA No. 924...

Maruti Foam (P) Ltd. Vs. Cegat

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1994(74)ELT813(All)

ORDERM.C. Agarwal, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. By an order dated 17-5-1994, the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi has dismissed the petitioner's application for stay of the recovery of...

Raj Bahadur Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14; Uttar Pradesh Public Service (Reservation for Physically Handicapped, Dependents of Freedom Fighters and Ex-Servicemen) Act, 1993 - Sections 2

Reported in : 1998(4)AWC647; (1999)2UPLBEC867

Advocate for Respondent : S.C.

M. Katju and M. C. Agarwal, JJ.1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel.2. The petitioner has prayed for a mandamus directing the District Magistrate. Chandauli to issue freedom fighter dependent certificate...