Advanced Search Results

Mahiboob Sab Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE31T DAY OF MAY, 2022 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.NARENDAR AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR WRIT PETITION NO.16363/2021 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN: MAHIBOOB SAB,...

State Of Karnataka Vs. Kenchaveerappa

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE21T DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M.JOSHI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1215/2016 BETWEEN: STATE OF KARNATAKA BY...

The Bangalore, Bangalore Rural And Vs. The Asst. Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. R. Vijaya Kumar, Sri. Ananda K, Smt. Archana K.M

- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:29381 WP No.29196 of 2014 C/W WP No.17857 of 2015 WP No.17858 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE25H DAY OF JULY, 2024 R BEFORE THE...

Shidramappa Harihar Vs. State of Karnataka and Another

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 16(1) and 307; Employment Exchanges (Company Notification of Vacancies) Act, 1959 - Sections 4(1)

Reported in : 1999(5)KarLJ677

Advocate for Respondent : Sri R.I. D'Sa, Government Adv.

ORDER1. Heard Mr. M.B. Chandrachooda, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R.I. D'Sa, learned Government Advocate for the respondents.2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for directions upon the 2nd respondent...

Sri B R Srinivas Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE26H DAY OF JULY2019BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NOs.23071-73 OF2019(LA-KIADB) PETITIONERBETWEEN : SRI B R SRINIVAS S/O LATE ANNAYAPPA AGED53YEARS...

Smt. Revamma Wife of Sri Municipal Puttaiah and Sri Renukaiah Son of S ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Reported in : 2008(4)KarLJ42; 2008(3)KCCRSN184; 2008(2)AIRKarR384; AIR2008NOC1241; 2008AIHC2002(Kar)

Advocate for Respondent : G. Sajjad Ahamad, Adv. for C/R1 in R.S.A. Nos. 883 and 1240/2006, ;Aslam Pasha and ;Abdul Khader, Advs. for C/R1, ;N. Srinivas and ;M.R. Shashidhar, Advs. for R1 and ;S.W. Arbatti, Adv. for R2 and R3

Ajit J. Gunjal, J.1. The appeals are admitted to consider the following substantial question of law:Whether the Lower Appellate Court was justified in reversing the judgment and decree of the Trial Court holding that item No....

Mooganna Vs. Iffco Tokio General

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

M.F.A.No.2097/2011 c/w M.F.A.No.2096/2011 c/w M.F.A.No.1904/2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF OCTOBER2015BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.2097/2011 (MV) R MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.2096/2011 (MV)...

Smt Shanthamma Vs. Smt Jayamma

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE21T DAY OF APRIL, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH R.S.A. NO.1621/2017 (PAR) BETWEEN: SMT. SHANTHAMMA W/O MADEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT56YEARS, R/O HALAHALLI...

Sri Ramaiah S/O Late Muniramaiah and ors Vs. the State of Karnataka In ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Sri N B Vishwanath, AGA; Sri Basavaraj V Sabarad, Advs.

ORDER1. Though the matter is posted for orders, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the main matter itself is taken up for disposal.2. Writ petitioners are persons who claim to be legal heirs...

Smt. Devamma Vs. Somegowda and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 128 and 128(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : 2002(3)KarLJ433

Advocate for Respondent : M.B. Chandrachooda, Adv. and ;R.A. Ramachandraiah, High Court Government Pleader

ORDERN.K. Patil, J.1. The matter is taken up for hearing with the consent of learned Counsels for both the parties.2. The petitioner is assailing the legality and validity of the impugned order passed by the 3rd...