Advanced Search Results

Shankar Ramchandra Iparkar Since Deceased by His Heirs Vs. Bhanudas Sh ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 and 114; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 103; Hindu Law

Reported in : 1987(1)BomCR434

Advocate for Respondent : C.A. Phadkar, Adv. for respondent No. 327 and ;M.B. Baadkar, Adv. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2

Sharad Manohar, J.1. The appellants before me are the heirs and legal representatives of original defendant No.1, who has filed this appeal against the decree for partition passed by the trial Court in flavour of plaintiffs...

Chandrakant Bhalchandra Nalavadkar and anr. Vs. Hiralal Mulchand Shah

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 13(1)

Reported in : 1984(1)BomCR480; (1984)86BOMLR45; 1983MhLJ1100

Advocate for Respondent : M.B. Baadkar, Adv.

M.N. Chandurkar., Ag. C.J.1. The petitioners-plaintiffs Nos. 2 and 3 are owners of an open plot of land which originally belonged to a Hindu Joint family. The respondent-defendant was admittedly a lessee of this piece of...

Shri Janardan Subrao Pai Vs. Shri Chandra Kamalaksha Pai and the State ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 20(3); Evidence Act - Sections 132

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD(Cri)80; 2003BomCR(Cri)1365; 2003CriLJ2909; 2003(4)MhLj342

Advocate for Respondent : M.B. Baadkar, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and ;B.H. Mehta, Adv. for Respondent No. 2

A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. Heard both sides for final disposal, by consent.2. The short question that arises in the present cased is: whether the Petitioner, who is complainant in the criminal case filed against the Respondent No....

Shakuntala Jethalal Shah and anr. Vs. Rajasthan Commercial and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 11(3), 11(4) and 11(5)

Reported in : 2006(3)ALLMR54; 2006(6)BomCR459

Advocate for Respondent : M.B. Baadkar, Adv. for ;Ujjwal P. Shirke, Adv. in 2723/1992

Khandeparkar R.M.S., J.1. Since common questions of law and facts arise in both these petitions, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. Heard Shri Badkar, the learned Advocate appearing for...

Vijaykumar Ramchandra Bhate Vs. Neela Vijaykumar Bhate

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1)

Reported in : II(2001)DMC64

Advocate for Respondent : M.B. Baadkar and ;Ajitkumar C. Shah, Advs.

Ranjana Desai, J.1. By the impugned judgment and order dated 7th April, 1994, the III Family Court at Bombay has allowed M.J. Petition No. 382 of 1993, filed by the respondent-wife for dissolution of marriage under...

Gobind Ram Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationContempt of Court

Reported in : AIR1972SC989; 1972CriLJ620; 1972MhLJ462(SC); (1972)1SCC740; [1972]3SCR536

Advocate for Respondent : M.C. Bhandare, ; S.B. Was and ; B.D. Sharma, Advs.

A.N. Grover, J. 1. This is an appeal by special leave from a judgment of the Bombay High Court finding the appellant who is an Advocate, guilty of contempt of court and sentencing him to simple...