Advanced Search Results

Amrut Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 498A

Reported in : II(2002)DMC168

Advocate for Respondent : S.G. Loney, A.P.P.

J.N. Patel, J.1. Heard Mr. Daga, Counsel for the appellant and Mr. Loney, A.P.P. for the respondent-State.2. The appellant-Amrut Sadashio Hulgunde is challenging the judgment and order dated 15.12.1995, passed by the Additional Sessions judge, Chandrapur,...

Sheikh Rashid Son of Sheikh Yakub Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Criminal

ORAL JUDGMENT (PER S.B.DESHMUKH, J) 1. The appellant, who stands convicted for the offence punishable under sections 302 and 498 A of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and to...

Madhukar Alias Babanrao S/O Ganpat Original Sabnis Vs. Smt. Kantabai W ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Property

Acts : Limitation Act - Section 18

1. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 13.9.1993, passed by the 10th Jt. Civil Judge (J.D.), Amravati in Regular Civil Suit No.30/1991, decreeing the suit of the respondent/plaintiff in the sum of Rs.23,400/- with...

Kamlabai Purushottam Dhut and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 12, 17 to 21, 21(1), 21(4), 27, 33, 33(3), 45 and 45(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 33; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(3)BomCR380; 2006(1)MhLj532

Advocate for Respondent : S.G. Loney, AGP

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Heard Shri Gilda, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Loney, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.2. Present petitioners who are legal representatives of original petitioner Purushottam challenged the order dated 16-4-1993...

Sharadchandra S/O Narayanrao Padgilwar Vs. State of Maharashtra and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4, 6 and 18; Stamp Act - Sections 47A

Reported in : 2008(1)ALLMR194; 2007(6)BomCR552; 2007(6)MhLj431

Advocate for Respondent : S.G. Loney and ;D.M. Kale, AGPs. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3

A.P. Lavande, J.1. By this appeal, the appellant takes exception to the judgment and order dated 2-5-1990 passed by Additional District Judge. Yavatmal in Land Acquisition Case No. 2/1984.2. The appellant and respondent Nos. 4 to...

Shivaji and ors. Vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18 and 19; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 22, Rules 3 and 4

Reported in : 2003(1)ALLMR633; 2003(1)BomCR108; (2003)1BOMLR691; 2002(4)MhLj778

Advocate for Respondent : S.G. Loney, Assistant Government Pleader

V.G. Palshikar, J. 1. This revision application is directed against the order dated 4-1-1996 rejecting an application by the present applicants for substitution of their names as legal representatives of one Janglu, who was the original...

Vandana Vs. Shridhar Kisan Pise and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 498A

Reported in : I(2005)DMC275

Advocate for Respondent : N.N. Motghare and ;Firdos Mirza, Advs. for Non-applicant No. 2 and ;S.G. Loney, Addl. Public Prosecutor for Non-applicant No. 3

P.S. Brahme, J.1. Heard Mr. De, learned Counsel for the applicant, Mr. Firdos Mirza, learned Counsel for non-applicant Nos. 1 and 2 and Mr. Loney, APP for non-applicant No. 3.2. The applicant herein has approached this...

Bhikku Mahapanth Vs. Deputy Director of Education and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 - Rule 3, 3(l), 3(2), 3(5) and 3(6)

Reported in : 2006(4)ALLMR303; 2006(3)MhLj599

Advocate for Respondent : S.G. Loney, Assistant Govt. Pleader for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 5

D.D. Sinha, J. 1. D.D. Sinha, J. : Heard Shri Malode, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Shri Loney, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 5. 2. The petition is directed...

Superintending Engineer and anr. Vs. Dattatraya Mahadeo Badarkhe and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2S, 25B, 25(N); Apprentice Act, 1961 - Sections 18; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Industrial Disputes Central Rules - Rule 81; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(2)ALLMR193; 2006(2)MhLj349

Advocate for Respondent : Loney, AGP for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. By this Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner Nos, 1 and 2 who are officers of the erstwhile Maharashtra State Electricity Board, are challenging the...

Kishanchand Lilaram Bajaj Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 18 and 27; Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 - Rule 65

Reported in : 2002(3)MhLj76

Advocate for Respondent : S.G. Loney, Additional Public Procecutor

D.D. Sinha, J.1. Heard Shri Manohar, learned Counsel for the applicant and Shri Loney, learned A.P.P. for the non-applicant. 2. The Criminal Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against the...