Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: lala hemanta kumar · Page 1 of about 40 results (0.043 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 11 1966

Triloknath Lall and anr. Vs. Malati Bibi Khetry and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-11-1966

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Section 21(2), 21(8) and 42; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4(O) and 5(2); ;Premises Tenancy Rules, 1956 - Rule 10; ;Premises Tenancy (Amendment) Rules, 1961

Reported in : AIR1967Cal145,1967CriLJ342

Advocate for Respondent : Lala Hemanta Kumar and ;Mohan Lal De, Advs.

B. Mukherji, J.1. The two petitioners before me, Trilok Nath Lall and Kedar Nath Lall, are the tenants of 73 Tarak Pramanik Road on a rent of Rs. 140 a month. For November and December 1958,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 1969

Pritish Kumar Mitra Vs. Prosanto Kumar Mitra and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-16-1969

Subject : Civil

Acts : Court-fees Act, 1870 - Section 19I and 19H

Reported in : AIR1970Cal236,74CWN272

Advocate for Respondent : Lala Hemanta Kumar, ;Rabindra Nath Mitra and ;Ranen Mitra, Advs. for Opp. Party No. 1, ;Sushil Chandra Dutta and ;A.K. Matilal, Advs. for Opp. Party No. 2

Amaresh Roy, J.1. This Rule issued upon an application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against an order passed by the learned Additional District Judge of Alipore in a pending probate proceeding numbered...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 1960

Sukdeo Sahi and ors. Vs. Kapil Deo Sing and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-01-1960

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law; ;Punjab Law Act, 1872 - Section 5; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 23, Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1960Cal597

Advocate for Respondent : Lala Hemanta Kumar and ;Mohanlal De, Advs. for Respondents (in S.A. 181/57), ;Lala Hemanta Kumar and ;Sudhir Kumar Dutta, Advs. for ;Respondents (in S.A. 651/57)

S.K. Sen, J.1. These two appeals arise from a suit for partition on a declaration as to his 8 annas share filed by the plaintiff respondent Kapildeo Singh sou of late Ram Gulam Singh.2. The facts...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 31 1968

Mohammed Seraj Vs. Adibar Rahaman Sheikh and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-31-1968

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 17, 21, 31 and 145; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 3, Rule 4 - Order 41, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1968Cal550,72CWN867

Advocate for Respondent : Dwijendra Narain Ghose and ;Nirmal Chandra Nandi, Advs.

Bijayesh Mukherji, J.1. Is the admission in the plaint of a suit, permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to sue afresh of any effect, in the suit instituted afterwards, in pursuance of the liberty so given?...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 1962

Lal Behari Sasmal Vs. Kanak Kanti Roy

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-16-1962

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 53A and 107

Reported in : AIR1962Cal502

Advocate for Respondent : Bhutnath Chatterjee and ;Hiran Kumar Roy, Advs.

1. This is an appeal by the defendant in a suit for ejectment and recovery of arrears of rent instituted in the Court of the Munsif at Uluberia on January 5, 1955.2. The appellant gets into...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 21 1967

Gotham Construction Co. Vs. Amulya Krishna Ghose and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-21-1967

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9, 100 and 101 - Order 1, Rule 1 - Order 20, Rule 6; ;Calcutta Minicipal Act, 1951 - Sections 437(1), 437(6), 537, 582 and 583; ;Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 54 and 56; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 45; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 113

Reported in : AIR1968Cal91,72CWN717

Advocate for Respondent : Chittatosh Mukherjee, Adv.

Bijayesh Mukherji, J.1. This is an appeal by the defendant, Gotham Construction Co., a firm, against whom the trial judge, and on appeal, the appellate judge as well, have granted a decree, permanently restraining it 'from...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 1953

Uma Kanta Banerjee Vs. Renwick and Co. Ltd., Decree-holder and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-30-1953

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 51 - Order 20, Rule 10 - Order 21, Rules 21 and 31

Reported in : AIR1953Cal717,58CWN683

Advocate for Respondent : A.C. Mitra and ;Sunil Kumar Mitra, Advs.

G.N. Das J. 1. This is an appeal by the judgment-debtor and is directed against an order of Mr. M.N. Mukherji, learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Birbhum, dated 18-2-1952.2. The facts may be shortly put as follows:...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 1963

Abharan Chandra Saha Vs. Sanat Kumar Sen

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-27-1963

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Tenancy Law; ;West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1954 - Sections 6, 6(2) and 59; ;West Bengal Estates Acquisition Rules, 1954 - Rule 4; ;Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885 - Section 26F; ;West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953

Reported in : AIR1964Cal460,68CWN574

Advocate for Respondent : A.D. Mukherjee and ;Bonbehari Sarkar, Advs.

Banerjee, J.1. The petitioner says Chat one Radha Ranjan Saha and be himself were co-sharer tenants in respect at C. S. Plot No 503 of Khatian No. 90. in Mouza Kumardanga, District Birbhum. On the death...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 1951

Abinash Chandra Dutta and ors. Vs. Gour Chandra

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-04-1951

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Section 5 - Schedule - Articles 131 and 181; ; Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885 - Sections 26G, 26G(5) and 185; ; Tenancy Law

Reported in : AIR1952Cal76,55CWN489

Advocate for Respondent : Ajit Kumar Dutt, Adv.

K.C. Chunder, J.1. This appeal is by a mortgagor claiming relief under Section 26G(5), Bengal Tenancy Act.2. The facts are simple. A usufructuary mortgage was executed in 1902. The mortgagees remained in possession. On 19-6-1946, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 1960

Gopiram Onkarmall Vs. Sewantilal Punam Chand

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-05-1960

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 103

Reported in : AIR1960Cal580,65CWN483

Advocate for Respondent : C.C. Ganguly, ;B.S. Bagchi and ;Archana Sen Gupta, Advs.

Renupada Mukherjee, J.1. The defendant of the trial court which is a firmof the name and style of Gopiram Onkarmal, is appellant in this appeal. The suit out of which thisappeal hag arisen was instituted in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial