Advanced Search Results

Mrs. Shakuntala Sawhney Vs. Mrs. Kaushalya Sawhney and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : FamilyProperty

Reported in : (1980)1SCC63; [1979]3SCR639; 1979(11)LC478(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : M.L. Verma, Adv.

Krishna Iyer, J.1. A judgment often possesses a sublime essence and a humdrum component. The appeal before us, in its happy conclusion, holds out the higher lesson that hate and fight are dissolved by basic human...

Fitwell Engineers Vs. Financial Commissioner, Delhi Administration and ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1975]35STC66(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : Lal Narain Sinha, Solicitor-General of India for Union of India, ; O.N. Mahindroo and ;

V.S. Deshpande, J.1. The decision of this and the connected six writ petitions depends on the construction of Section 5(2)(a)(ii) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, as applied to Delhi (hereinafter called the Act)...

A.L. Kalra Vs. Project and Equipment Corporation of India Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; PEC House Building Advance (Grant and Recovery) Rules - Rule 10(1); PEC Employees' (Conduct, Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1975 - Rules 4, 4(1), 5, 25, 27(19), 33 and 35; PEC Conveyance Advance (Grant and Recovery) Rules - Rule 8

Reported in : AIR1984SC1361; [1984(49)FLR119]; (1984)IILLJ186SC; 1984(1)SCALE798; (1984)3SCC316; [1984]3SCR646; 1984(2)SLJ82(SC); 1984(16)LC733(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Lal Narain Sinha, ; M.C. Bhandare and ; P.P. Singh, Advs.

D.A. Desai, J.1. Failure to adjust the antena to the operative channel and dipping the head like the proverbial ostrich in the sand so as not to view the changing kaleidoscope of the law can alone...

Adv. Aires Rodrigues Vs. the State of Goa by Its Chief Secretary and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : The Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 9; Constitution (91st Amendment) Act, 2003; Punjab Parliament Secretaries Salary, Allowances and Privileges Ordinance, 2002; Karnataka Parliamentary Secretaries Allowances Act, 1963; Assam Parliamentary Secretaries (Appointment, Salaries, Allowances and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2004; Arunachal Pradesh Parliamentary Secretaries (Appointment, Salaries, Allowances and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance, 2007; Parliamentary Secretary (Payment of Special Allowance And Prevention of Disqualification) Act, 1971; West Bengal Legislature (Removal of Disqualifications) Act, 1952; Parliament (Prevention of Disqualification) Act, 1959; Karnataka legislature (Prevention of Disqualification) Act, 1956; Representation of People Act, 1951; Mini

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR737

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Kantak, Adv. General, ;A. Kamat, Additional Government Adv. for the respondent No. 1, ;S.K. Kakodkar, Sr. Adv., ;Nitin Sardessai, Adv. for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 4, ;C.A. Ferreira, Adv. for t

Swatanter Kumar, C.J.1. The Petitioner who is a practising advocate and who also claims to be a public spirited citizen, has approached this Court by way of present Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the...

State of Karnataka Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 75(2), 75(3), 105, 131, 131A, 154, 164(2), 194, 194(3), 226, 245 to 255, 256, 257, 329 and 368; Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 1(2), 3, 3(1) and 3(4); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 176 and 177; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 204; Representation of People Act

Reported in : AIR1978SC68; (1977)4SCC608; [1978]2SCR1

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Kacker, Solicitor General, ; Soli J. Sorabjee, Addl. Solicitor General, ;

Beg, C.J.1. 'India, that is Bharat, shall be union of States'. The very first mandate of the first article of our Constitution to which we owe allegiance thus prohibits, by necessary implication, according to the plaintiff...

Phul Kumari Devi Vs. Sambhu Prasad Singh and ors. Overruled

Court : Patna

Subject : Family Property

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 144; Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 65; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Section 11 - Order 43, Rule 33

Reported in : AIR1965Pat87

G.N. Prasad, J.1. This is an appeal from the decisions of Choudhary, J. in F. A. No. 357 of 1951. The appellant, who was also the appellant before Choudhary, J., is defendant No. 1 in a...

Chief Justice of Andhra Pradesh and ors. Vs. L.V.A. Dixitulu and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 229, 235, 311 and 371D

Reported in : AIR1979SC193; 1979LabIC1672; (1979)2SCC34; [1979]1SCR26

Advocate for Respondent : Vopa Parthasarthy and ; S. Subba Rao, Advs.

Sarkaria, J.1. This judgment will not only dispose of this Appeal (C.A. 2826 of 1977) but also furnish reasons in support of our short order dated August 4, 1978, by which we allowed Civil Appeal No....

State of Bihar Vs. Madan Mohan Prasad and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32, 226, 233, 235 and 309; Bihar Superior Judicial Service Rules, 1951 - Rules 5, 6, 15 and 16; Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Court Act, 1887

Reported in : AIR1976SC404; 1976LabIC297; (1976)ILLJ288SC; (1976)1SCC529; [1976]3SCR110

Advocate for Respondent : B.P. Singh, Adv.

R.S. Sarkaria, J.1. Respondents 1,2 and 3 herein made an application under Article 226 of the Constitution, alleging that the decision of the Bihar State Government fixing the seniority' of Respondent 4 below Shri C.P. Singh...

Raj Kumar and anr. Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4 and 5

Reported in : ILR1974Delhi81

T.V.R. Tatachari, J. (1) These two Civil Petitions, No 473-D of 1963 and 15-D of 1966, can be disposed of by a common judgment as the main points for determination are the same in both the...

Subhash Chandra and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975 - Rule 5; Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1953 - Rule 5; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 233(2); Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1972 - Rule 5; Uttar Pradesh Judicial Service Rules, 2001 - Rule 34; Uttar Pradesh Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1956 - Rules 3(2) and 15; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 4

Reported in : (2004)2UPLBEC1150

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. Sudhir Agarwal

A.K. Yog, J.1. Subhash Chandra, Angad Prasad, Abdul Quaiyum and Narendra Kumar Singh, four petitioners, have filed the present writ petition under Article 226, Constitution of India praying for following reliefs :'(i) issue a writ, order...