Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: l n rao · Page 1 of about 528 results (0.226 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 26 2009

Ramgad Minerals and Mining Pvt. Ltd. Now Represented by Its Director S ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-26-2009

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 59(1); Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - SectionS 2, 3(2) and 5(2); Forest (Conservation) Regulations - Regulation 3(1); Income Tax Act, 1961; Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 18 and 35; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 14, 19, 24A(6), 28, 28(1), 28(2), 28A, 29, 29(1), 29A, 30, 37, 37(1), 37(1A), 37(2), 39, 54 and 59; Mineral Conservation and Development Rules, 1988 - Rule 23A(1) and 23F(6); Constitution of India - Articles 141, 226 and 227

Advocate for Respondent : M.R. Achar, Sr. Counsel for; M.A. Vijay, Adv. for R1,; Basavaraj Karreddy, G.A. for R1, R2 and R3,; Y. Hari Prasad, CGSC for R3 and R4,; D.L.N. Rao, Sr. Counsel and; S.R. Anuradha, Adv. for R5

P.D. Dinakaran, C.J.1. Core Issued:1) Whether the renewal of mining lease in favour of the original lease holder, {M/s. Dalmia Cements (Bharat) Limited} on 3.7.1986 with effect from 25.1.1983 without obtaining prior permission under Section 2...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 09 2008

P.S. Gopinathan Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-09-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Kerala State Higher Judicial Service Rules; Kerala Judicial Service Rules, 1991; Kerala Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1961 - Rules 1, 2, 5(2) and 6; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 233 and 233(1)

Reported in : 2008(7)SCALE564; (2008)7SCC70; 2008(3)SLJ268(SC); 2008AIRSCW4602; AIR2008SC2768; 2008(4)Supreme85

Advocate for Respondent : Parag P. Tripathi, A.A.G., ; Jawahar Lal Gupta, ; L.N. Rao

P.P. Naolekar, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant was directly recruited to the post of Munsiff and was later promoted to the post of Subordinate Judge. Thereafter, the appellant was promoted to the Kerala State Higher Judicial...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2002

Y.R. Shenoy and ors. Vs. Syndicate Bank and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-20-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Syndicate Bank (Officers) Service Regulations - Regulation 46

Reported in : [2003(97)FLR812]; (2003)IILLJ977Kant

Advocate for Respondent : Sunderswamy Ramdas, ;D.L.N. Rao, ;B.S. Shankaranarayana, ;T.M. Venkata Reddy, ;Ashok Harnahalli, ;S.V. Narasimhan and ;Anand, Advs.

N. Kumar, J. 1. As in these Writ Petitions common question of law and facts are involved these petitions are disposed of by a common order. However, for the purpose of clarity the brief facts pertaining...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 30 2004

Smt. Shantala G. Rao Vs. the Divisional Commissioner, Mysore Division ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-30-2004

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Karnataka Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Reservation of Appointments, etc.) Act, 1990 - Sections 4; Karnataka Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Reservation of Appointments, etc.) (Amendment) Rules, 1993 - Rules 4 and 6; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : ILR2004KAR4801; 2004(6)KarLJ325

Advocate for Respondent : H.B. Narayana, High Court Government Pleader for Respondents 1 and 2 and ;D.L.N. Rao, Adv. for Respondents 3 and 4

ORDERRam Mohan Reddy, J.1. The petitioner has called in question the legality and validity of the order dated 7-6-1996 of the 2nd respondent-Caste Verification Committee, recording a finding that the petitioner does not belong to 'Maleru'...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2001

Samrat Ashok Exports Ltd. Vs. Asst. Provident Fund Commissioner and Re ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-21-2001

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 77

Reported in : AIR2002Kant61

Advocate for Respondent : Ashok Haranahalli, C.G.S.C. for Respondent No. 1, ;D.L.N. Rao and ;Anuradha, Advs. and ;Ashok Haranahalli, C.G.S.C.

ORDERR. Gururajan, J.1. M/s. Samrat Ashok Exports Ltd., is before this Court challenging the Auction proceedings dated 28-3-2001 at Annexure 'C' on the following facts.2. The petitioner M/s. Samrat Ashok Exports Ltd., is the owner of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2001

State Bank of Travancore Vs. Recovery Officer, Employees Provident Fun ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-21-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 7Q and 8C(2)

Reported in : [2002(95)FLR318]; (2003)ILLJ88Kant

Advocate for Respondent : Ashok Harnahalli, C.G.S.C., ;Sheelvanth, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and ;D.L.N. Rao, Adv. for Respondent No. 3 in W.P. No. 18498/2001 and ;D.L.N. Rao and ;Anuradha, Advs. and ;Ashok Harnhalli, C.G.S.C.

R. Gururajan, J. 1. Samrat Ashok Exports Ltd., is before this Court challenging the auction proceedings dated March 28, 2001, at Annexure 'C' on the following facts. 2. The petitioner Samrat Ashok Exports Ltd., is the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 12 2009

Shiba Shankar Mohapatra and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-12-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Orissa Police Manual Rules - Rules 650 and 683; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2010SC706; JT2009(14)SC298; 2009(13)SCALE689; 2009(6)LHSC3864; (2010)12SCC471

Advocate for Respondent : L.N. Rao, Sr. Adv., ; Radha Shyam Jena, ; Shibashish Misra

B.S. Chauhan, J.1. Leave granted in all the matters.2. These appeals have been preferred against the judgment and order dated 7.2.2008 passed in writ petition Nos. 426, 1233, 2878, 3424 and 5637 of 2006 by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 2006

Board of Trustees, Visakhapatnam Port Trust and ors. Vs. T.S.N. Raju a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-06-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872; Constitution of India - Article 12; ;CPF Regulation; GPF Regulation; Gratuity Act

Reported in : JT2006(8)SC486; 2006(9)SCALE55; (2006)7SCC664; 2007(3)SLJ347(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : L.N. Rao (N.P.), Sr. Adv., ; G. Ramakrishna Prasad, ; Mohd.

ORDERSub: Grant of Voluntary Retirement under V.R. Scheme to the employees- M.O.S.T. Letter No. LB- 16016/7/94-L-II, dt.29.08.1991-Reg. During the daily HODs Meeting held on 23.08.2000, keeping in view the concern expressed by the Secretary (Dept. of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 2006

State of A.P. Vs. Smt. Prameela Modi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-30-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 - Sections 8; ;Constitution of India - Article 226 ; ;Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 - Sections 14; ;Andhra Pradesh Civil Courts Act, 1972; Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Act 1923 - Sections 13; ;Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : 2006(11)SCALE38

Advocate for Respondent : Harish N. Salve, ; R.F. Nariman, ; L.N. Rao, Sr. Advs., ;

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Leave granted.2. This case has a chequered history. This is the sixth in series of litigation between the State of A.P. and the respondents herein. Both parties are in the legal battle field...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 2008

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Wipro Finance Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-02-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10, 36(1), 36(2), 43A, 113, 132, 132A, 143, 143(1), 143(2), 143(3), 147, 158BA, 158BA(2), 158BB and 158BC

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(Kar)105; [2009]176TAXMAN233(Kar)

Advocate for Respondent : D.L.N. Rao, ;S.R. Anuradha, ;A. Shankar and ;M. Lava, Advs.

Arali Nagaraj, J.1. In these two appeals, the appellant-Revenue has challenged legality and correctness of two orders dt. 12th Dec, 2003 (for the asst. yr. 1996-97) and dt. 3rd June, 2004 (for the asst. yr. 1997-98)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial