Advanced Search Results
S.A. Kareem Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Oct-28-2003
Service Tax
(2004)(165)ELT185Tri(Chennai)
1. When the case was called, Id. Counsel, Smt. L. Mythili, submits that the appellant is no more and he has passed away. She submits that the Mumbai Bench in a similar matter on the death...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.L.J. Plastics Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Nov-12-1999
Customs
(2000)LC124Tri(Chennai)
1. This is an appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. C. Cus. 486/99, dated 6-8-1999 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) wherein the present appellants' appeal before her was rejected. In the attendant Order-in-Original No. 318/99, dated 28-6-1999 passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Chemplast
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jul-02-1999
Service Tax
(1999)(66)ECC364
1. This is a Reference application against this Tribunal Final Order No. 282/ 98 dated 10.2.98 by Revenu on the following question of law sought to be referred: Whether the Hon'ble CEGAT is correct in extending...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Swathy Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jul-09-1999
Excise
(1999)(66)ECC354
1. This is an appeal against Order-in-Original No. 26/91, dated 29-8-1991 passed by the Collector of Central Excise wherein the demand of Rs. 24,51,006.96 has been confirmed on the appellants for manufacture and clearance of Copper/...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSrf Ltd., Chemplast Sanmar Ltd. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
May-28-2003
Service Tax
(2003)(88)ECC559
1. The appeal filed by M/s SRF Limited is against Order-in-Appeal No.134/97 (T) dated 9.10.97 and the appeals filed by M/s. Chemplast Sanmar Ltd. are directed against Order-in-Appeal No. 137 & 138/95 (CBE) dtd.16.8.95 and the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommr. of C. Ex., Chennai Vs. Titanium Equipment and Anode Mfg.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jan-18-2002
Land Acquisition
(2002)(81)ECC167
These two Revenue appeals and the party's appeal raise a common question of law and facts. Hence, they are taken up together for disposal as per law.2. Revenue Appeal No. E/305/2000 arises from Order-in-Original No.16/98, dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBakelite Hylam Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Jun-23-2005
Service Tax
(2005)(192)ELT609Tri(Bang.)
1. This is an appeal against the OIO No. 17/2002 dated 19.6.2002 passed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Hyderabad-III Commissionerate. The appellants manufacture Decorative Laminates at their factory at Hyderabad. The issue involved...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollr. of Cus. Vs. Indo-swiss Synthetic Gem Mfg. Co. Ltd.
Chennai
Nov-22-1995
CustomsLimitation
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 27, 27(2) and 28D; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B and 12B; Constitution of India - Article 226
1995(52)ECC53; 2003(162)ELT121(Mad)
Habibullah Badsha, Adv. ;R. Sasidharan, Sr. Counsel and ;L. Mythili, Adv.
Janarthanam, J.1. The Indo-Swiss Synthetic Gem . (for short 'Company') - respondent (in all Writ Appeals - petitioner) is situate at 13/239, Main Road, Mettupalayam-1. The company, it is said, is a manufacturer of synthetic gem....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Itc Ltd.
Chennai
Mar-21-2005
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35H(1)
2005(185)ELT114(Mad); (2005)2MLJ158
L. Mythili, Adv.
ORDERMarkandey Katju, C.J.1. This is a reference application on behalf of the revenue under Section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, by which the following questions have been sought to be referred to us for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Chemplast Sanmar Ltd.
Chennai
Mar-24-2005
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35H(1)
2009(239)ELT398(Mad); (2005)2MLJ253
L. Mythili, Adv.
ORDERMarkandey Katju, C.J.1. This is a reference application under Section 35(H)(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 by which the following substantial question of law is sought to be referred for our opinion:-'Whether MODVAT credit could...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »