Advanced Search Results
N. Sankaran Vs. S. Revathi
Chennai
Dec-19-1989
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13B and 13B(2)
II(1990)DMC236
L. Mohan, Adv.
Nainar Sundaram, J.1. This civil miscellaneous appeal is directed against the judgment and decree of the Principal Family Court at Madras in M.O.P. No. 586 of 1988. That was a petition presented by the appellant and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnited India Insurance Company Ltd. and anr. Vs. Tiruvalluvar Transpor ...
Chennai
Dec-31-2002
Motor VehiclesInsurance
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2, 95, 110A and 166
2003(1)CTC156; (2003)1MLJ323
L. Mohan, Adv. for Respondent No. 3 in CMA. No. 612/94 and Respondent No. 1 in CMA. Nos. 613/94 and 1784/96 and ;P. Jagadeesan, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 in CMA. No. 612/94 and Respondent No. 2 in CMA
ORDERP. Sathasivam, J. 1. Since all these three appeals arose from a common award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Villupuram, they are being disposed of by the following common judgment.2. CMA.Nos.612 and 613 of 1994...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnited India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Tiruvalluvar Transport Corpora ...
Chennai
Dec-31-2002
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 173
I(2003)ACC553; 2004ACJ801
N.B. Surekha, Adv. For R.3 in CMA. No. 1784/1996, ;L. Mohan, Adv. For R.3 in CMA. No. 612/94 and for R.1 in CMA. Nos. 613/94 and 1784/96 and ;P. Jagadeesan, Adv. For R.1 in CMA. No. 612/94 and for R.2
P. Sathasivam, J.1. Since all these three appeals arose from a common award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Villupuram, they are being disposed of by the following common judgement.2. CMA. Nos. 612 and 613 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rajni Tandon Vs. Dulal Ranjan Ghosh Dastidar and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-29-2009
Property
Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 31, 32, 33, 33(1), 34, 87, 88 and 89; West Bengal Apartment Owners Act
2010(1)AWC509(SC); JT2009(11)SC666; 2009(II)OLR(SC)576; 2009(10)SCALE402; 2009AIRSCW5416; 2009(5)LHSC3048
Abhijit Sengupta (NP) and ; Ranjan Mukherjee, Advs.
Mukundakam Sharma, J.1. The present Civil Appeal raises questions relating to interpretation of Section 32 and 33 of the Registration Act, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').2. The dispute pertains to a Flat situated on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSudheena.S., vs Dr. Anusree.M.,
Kerala
Oct-27-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN FRIDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 26TH KARTHIKA, 1945 OP(KAT) NO. 444...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSudheena.S., vs Dr. Pradeep Sankar. S.,
Kerala
Oct-27-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN FRIDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 26TH KARTHIKA, 1945 OP(KAT) NO. 444...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Bank, Represented by Its Chief Manager Vs. P. Vijayakumari, Pro ...
Chennai
Oct-10-2007
Banking
Legal Service Authorities Act - Sections 21(1) and 21(2); Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 19 and 19(21); Debts Recovery Tribunal Act - Sections 22; Debts Recovery Tribunal Rules - Rule 18; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 148 - Order 21, Rules 90, 92 and 92(1) - Order 34, Rule 5 and 5(1)
AIR2008Mad45; (2007)6MLJ766
Prasanth, Adv. for respondents 1 and 2
R. Sudhakar, J.1. The bank has filed this writ petition to set aside the order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal extending the time given to the respondents 1 and 2 to pay the bank as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.R.C. Parcel Service Vs. Poongothai and ors.
Chennai
Aug-18-2000
Motor Vehicles
2002ACJ1774
S. Sivasangaran and ;S. Udaya Kumar, Advs.
K. Sampath, J.1. The respondent No. 3 in M.A.C.T.O.P. No. 168 of 1988 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal at Pondicherry, is the appellant in the civil miscellaneous appeal. Respondent Nos. 1 to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.S. Sulochana Vs. S. Rathinasabapathi Mudaliar
Chennai
Jul-08-1996
Tenancy
(1996)2MLJ538
ORDERA.R. Lakshmanan, J.1. The civil revision petition has been filed by the landlady against the order of the Principal Subordinate Judge/Appellate Authority, Vellore, in R.C.A.No. 63 of 1990, reversing the order passed by the District Munsif/Rent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Income Tax and the Income Tax Officer Vs. Sri P.L. ...
Karnataka
Jun-22-2010
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act - Sections 48, 54, 54F, 143(1) and 148
S. Parthasarathi and; H. Mallaha Rao, Advs.
B.V. Nagarathna, J.1. The revenue has preferred this appeal by challenging the order dated 30.5.2005 passed in ITA. No. 252/Bang/2004 by raising the following substantial questions of law:i) Whether the Tribunal was correct in holding that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »