Advanced Search Results

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Smt. Kamla Devi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 163A, 166 and 168

Reported in : AIR2008Delhi157

Advocate for Respondent : L.C. Goyal, Adv.

Kailash Gambhir, J.1. By way of this appeal, the appellant seeks to challenge the impugned award dated 10.10.2006 whereby an award of Rs. 4,80,000/- was passed by the tribunal in favor of claimant/respondent. Brief summary of...

M/S. Deogiri Transport, Represented by Its Power of Attorney, Prakash ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

Oral Judgment: Heard Mr. P. S. Rao, learned Advocate for the appellant and Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, learned Senior Advocate for the respondent. 2. By this appeal, the appellant takes exception to the judgment and order...

Pawan Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 - Sections 7A; Juvenile Justice Act, 1986; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 201, 302, 376 and 377; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 164, 228, 303, 304 and 313

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR1239; 2009CriLJ2257; 2009(3)SCALE195; 2009(3)LC1237(SC); 2009(1)LHSC1382; 2009AIRSCW2171; 2009(1)LHSC382

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Shamshery, ; Jatinder Bhatia and ; A.P. Sahay, Adv

R.M. Lodha, J.1. Leave granted in S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 5209/2006.The appellants in these four appeals suffered death sentence for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 IPC, at the hands of Additional Distt. & Sessions Judge, First...

Harshadsingh Pahelvansingh Thakore Vs. the State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR1977SC710; 1977CriLJ352; (1976)4SCC640; [1977]1SCR626; 1976(8)LC891(SC)

Krishna Iyer, J.1. Judicial summitry, when the subject of dispute is re-appraisal of evidence even on the sophisticated ground of mis-appreciation, has to submit itself to certain self-restraining rules of processual symmetry. The trial Court directly...

Pramod Chopra and ors. Vs. Apparels Export Promotion Council

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 25

Reported in : ILR1984Delhi717

S.S. Chadha, J.(1) The plaintiffs have instituted the present suit for various declarations and injunction. The two reliefs which are now pressed are for declarations that the Election Rules framed by the Executive Committee of the...

Vasanthakumar.K. Vs. Thomas.C.G.and Another

Court : Kerala

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN TUESDAY, THE22D DAY OF OCTOBER201330TH ASWINA, 1935 CRL.A.No. 159 of 2007 (D) Crl.L.P. 34/2007 of-----------------------DATED1601-2007 HIGH COURT OF KERALA AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN...

Kshiti Bhusan Chakraborty Vs. North Eastern Regional Institute of Scie ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Z. Angami, J.1. By this application filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the legality and validity of order dated 02.02.2006 passed by the disciplinary authority and order dated 27.06.2006...

Venkatesh Dutt Vs. Ms Shoes East Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138

Reported in : II(2004)BC19; 2004CriLJ1695; (2004)137PLR32

Advocate for Respondent : Ravi Gupta, Adv.

J.D. Kapoor, J. 1. Short question involved for consideration in these proceedings is whether the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act relating to dishonoring of a cheque which in this case was of...

Fragrant Leasing and Finance Company Ltd. and anr. Vs. Jagdish Katuriy ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CriminalBanking

Reported in : 2007CriLJ3880

ORDERM.K. Mittal, J.1. This appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 28-8-2004 passed by C.J.M., Varanasi in Criminal Complaint Case No. 4015 of 2004 under Section 138, N.I. Act (hereinafter referred to as...

Mohinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1976SC2299; 1976CriLJ1755; (1977)3SCC346; 1977(9)LC12(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : P. Parameshware Rao and ; T. V. S. Narasimhachari, Advs.

ORDERV.R. Krishna Iyer, J.1. Shri L.C. Goyal, counsel for the petitioner, with the art of brinkmanship, has come up at the last moment as he has done on former occasions, to pray for stay of execution...