Advanced Search Results

Hardeep Singh Anand Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Reported in : 2008CriLJ3281; 2008(5)MPHT172

A.K. Patnaik, C.J.1. This is an appeal filed under Section 2(1) of the M. P. Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 against the order dated 24-8-2007 passed by the learned single Judge in W.P....

Cadbury India Limited and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Food Adulteration

Reported in : 2007(4)MPHT183

ORDERA.K. Patnaik, C.J.1. Petitioner No.1 is a Company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913 and carries on the business, inter alia, in various kinds of chocolates, cocoa liquor and other cocoa based products and the...

A.C. Saxena Vs. Shri Ajay Tirki

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Kumaresh Pathak

1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR Conc. No.1623/2012 Sachin Kumar Vijay Vargiya Vs. Shri Ajay Tirki & Another Conc. No.1410/2012 A. C. Saxena Vs. Shri Ajay Tirki & Another Conc. No.1517/2012 Praveen...

Praveen Kumar Trivedi Vs. Shri Ajay Tirki

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Kumaresh Pathak

1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR Conc. No.1623/2012 Sachin Kumar Vijay Vargiya Vs. Shri Ajay Tirki & Another Conc. No.1410/2012 A. C. Saxena Vs. Shri Ajay Tirki & Another Conc. No.1517/2012 Praveen...

SachIn Kumar Vijay Vargiya Vs. Shri Ajay Tirki

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Kumaresh Pathak

1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR Conc. No.1623/2012 Sachin Kumar Vijay Vargiya Vs. Shri Ajay Tirki & Another Conc. No.1410/2012 A. C. Saxena Vs. Shri Ajay Tirki & Another Conc. No.1517/2012 Praveen...

Smt.Sudha Sandheliya Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Kumaresh Pathak, Smt. Alka Pandya

- ( 1 ) - WP Nos.5938/2008 & 12340/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR W.P.No.5938 of 2008 Smt. Sudha Sandheliya Versus State of M.P. & three others ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri B.P.Sharma, learned counsel...

Kamlesh Prasad Tiwari Vs. Shri A.K. Varwal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Kumaresh Pathak

Conc. No.456/2012 13/5/2013: Shri V.C.Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Kumaresh Pathak, learned counsel for the respondents. Keeping in view the order passed vide Annexure R/1 passed on 7/5/2012 directing for joining of the petitioner...

Chandrabhan Brijmohan and Co. and anr. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of S ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 18, 18(6), 18(8), 18(9)and 19, 19(1), 42, 42A and 52; ;Madhya Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1959; Madhya Pradesh Sthaniya Kshetra Me Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Adhiniyam, 1976; ;Madhya Pradesh Sthaniya Kshetra Men Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Sanshodhan Tatha Vidhi Manyakaran (Amendment) Adhiniyam, 1981; ;Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1978 - Sections 20 and 20(2); ;Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; Income Tax Act, 1961; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(2)MPHT55; 2006(2)MPLJ135

Advocate for Respondent : Kumaresh Pathak, Govt. Adv.

ORDERShantanu Kemkar, J.1. The petitioners are partnership firms carrying on the business of manufacture and sale of pulses at Gadarwara. They are registered dealers under the M.P. Sales Tax Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'Sales...

Sanju @ Sanjay Ben Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 - Sections 5; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 107, 110, 116(3), 151, 324 and 379; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2005(4)MPHT102

Advocate for Respondent : Kumaresh Pathak, Govt. Adv.

Dipak Misra, J.1. Invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for issue of a writ of certiorari for quashment of the order...

Pramod Soni Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 22, 41 and 41A; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(2)MPHT180

Advocate for Respondent : Kumaresh Pathak, Govt. Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Invoking the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner, an elected Councillor of the Municipal Council, Hoshangabad, has called in question the defensibility...