Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: kulshrestha · Page 1 of about 529 results (0.060 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 09 1995

Jag Pal Singh and Another Vs. G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-09-1995

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Uttar Pradesh Krishi and Pradhogik Vishvavidhyalaya Adhiniyam - Regulations 26 and 14(1)

Reported in : AIR1996All271

Advocate for Respondent : Dinesh Keaker, Adv.

ORDERPetitioners, who are students of M.Sc. (Ag.) Agronomy and M.Sc. (Ag.) Horticulture of G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology Pant Nagar, Nainital, hereinafter referred to as the University, challenge the order dated 17-8-95, whereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 1994

Dharmendra Kumar Vs. Smt. Pushpa Devi

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-26-1994

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 23(2), 24, 25, 26 and 27

Reported in : AIR1995MP210; II(1995)DMC461; 1995(0)MPLJ555

Advocate for Respondent : R.N. Sharma, Adv.

ORDER1. Revision petitioner is the husband of the respondent. They are governed by the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter called 'the Act' for short). Revision petitioner filed an application in the lower Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 1994

Dr. Umrao Singh Choudhary Vs. State of M.P. and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-22-1994

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 162; Administrative Law; Madhya Pradesh Vishwa Vidyalaya Adhiniyam, 1973 - Sections 4, 13, 14, 22, 23, 24, 25, 40, 47, 50, 52(1), 52(3), 52(4) and 68

Reported in : AIR1995MP75

Advocate for Respondent : G.M. Chafekar, Senior Adv. and ;Kulshrestha, Adv.

V.D. Gyani, J. 1. Judicial review of Staleaction by way of certiorari has been invokedby none else than the Vice-Chancellor of DeviAhilya Vishwavidhalaya, Indore. This Courtis faced with a dispute in which academicadministrative law, delegated legislation...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 01 1994

Mandu Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Madhya Pradesh Pradushan Niw ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-01-1994

Subject : Environment

Acts : Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 - Sections 33(A); Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR1995MP57

Advocate for Respondent : Kulshrestha, Adv.

ORDER1. This order also governs the disposal of M. P. No. 2037/93 (Kedia Leather v. The M. P. Pradushan Niyantran Board). M.P. No. 692/92(Kedia Leather v. The M. P. Pradushan Niyantran Board), M. P. No. 2129/93...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 1995

Shankar Vs. Indore Municipal Corporation and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-19-1995

Subject : ElectionConstitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 - Sections 22, 23(5), 28, 28(1), 28(2), 33, 441A and 441B; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1996MP154; 1996(0)MPLJ798

Advocate for Respondent : A.M. Mathur, ;Vivek Sharan and ;Kulshrestha, Advs.

ORDERC.K. Prasad, J.1. The petitioner in his application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has inter alia prayed for the following reliefs :--(i) That, an appropriate writ, order or direction be issued...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2004

Govind Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-07-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149, 294 and 302

Reported in : 2005CriLJ1244

Advocate for Respondent : Madhukar Kulshrestha, Adv. and ;Ami Prabal, Govt. Adv.

1. Both the aforesaid appeals arise out of the common judgment dated 20-8-1994 passed in Sessions Trial No. 259/1992. This judgment shall also govern the disposal of Criminal Appeal No. 188/1994 and Criminal Appeal No. 58/1995....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 1983

Swaroopchandra Garg Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-31-1983

Subject : Civil

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 55(1); Madhya Pradesh Van Upaj (Vyapar Viniyanam) Adhiniyam, 1969 - Sections 19(1) and 22

Reported in : AIR1984MP7

Advocate for Respondent : S. Kulshrestha, Deputy Govt. Adv.

Sohani, J. 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.2. Material facts giving rise to this petition briefly are as follows:--The petitioner carries on business at Dhamnod of transporting goods by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 22 1997

U.P. Financial Corporation and ors. Vs. V.P. Sharma and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-22-1997

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Allahabad High Court Rules - Rule 5; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1999)IIILLJ538All; (1998)1UPLBEC304

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Budhwar, Adv.

D.P. Mohapatra, C.J.1. This appeal filed under Chapter VIII, Rule 5 of the Allahabad High Court Rules by the U. P. Financial Corporation through its Chairman, the Managing Director of the Corporation and the Board of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 1995

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Hukumchand Mills Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-19-1995

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 2; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 46

Reported in : 1996(0)MPLJ585

Advocate for Respondent : P.M. Chaudhary, Adv.

ORDERA.R. Tiwari, J.1. To tax or not to tax is the question. On applications of the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Madhya Pradesh under Section 44(1) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 (for short...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 2007

Sarita and ors. Vs. Mahboob Khan and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-28-2007

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2008ACJ2354

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Sudha Shrivastava

S.K. Kulshrestha, J.1. Mr. Sanjay Patwa, counsel for the appellants. Ms. Sudha Shrivastava, counsel for the respondent No. 2. With the consent of the parties, the appeal was finally heard. By this appeal the appellant seeks...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial