Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: kshirsagar · Page 1 of about 276 results (0.045 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 25 1992

Abdul Hamid Ismail Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-25-1992

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 163, 420, 467, 468 and 471

Reported in : 1994(2)BomCR235

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Deshmukh, A.P.P.

M.F. Saldanha, J.1. This appeal and the Companion Appeal No. 516 of 1985 have been preferred by the same appellant. At the relevant time, the appellant was a police constable in the office of the Police...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2007

Radhabai W/O Laxmanrao Ghate Vs. Dattatraya S/O Raghunath Jog

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-21-2007

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Debt Relief Act, 1975; Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 136; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 11(2)

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR130; 2008(3)MhLj374

Advocate for Respondent : M.S. Jawalkar, Adv.

C.L. Pangarkar, J.1. This review application has been filed against the judgment delivered in Civil Revision Application No. 115 of 2006 by this Court. The parties hereinafter shall be referred to as decree-holder and judgment-debtor.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2010

Birla Cotsyn (India) Ltd.Vs. Tarachand S/O Chiranjilal Sharma, Aged 53 ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Aug-26-2010

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Section 28; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1947 - Section 3 (13)

Advocate for Respondent : Shri S.D. Thakur,; Shri P.S. Kshirsagar, Advs.

1. Challenge in all this three writ petitions is to identical orders passed by Labour Court appeal by Industrial Court in revisions. All complaints are under Section 28 of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 15 2010

Ramesh S/O. Tulshiram Mahajan and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Jul-15-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 326, 34, 307; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 313

Advocate for Respondent : Smt. Y.M. Kshirsagar, Adv.

1. Challenge in this appeal is to the conviction and sentence imposed upon the appellants herein, by way of judgment and order dated 16th April 2010, rendered by the learned Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 2004

Madhao S/O Somaji Sarode Vs. Jotiba Dhyan Upasak Shikshan Sanstha and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-30-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1978 - Sections 9(3); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Sections 9 and 9(1)

Reported in : 2004(6)BomCR684; 2004(3)MhLj1078

Advocate for Respondent : S.P. Kshirsagar and ;S.D. Khati, Advs. for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and ;D.P. Thakre, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No. 4

B.R. Gavai, J.1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Shri S. P. Kshirsagar; learned Counsel waives notice on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Shri D. P. Thakre, learned Assistant Government Pleader...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 13 2008

Kotak Mahindra Prime Limited Vs. Sanjeev Sadaram Chavare and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-13-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9A, 20 and 100 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 41, Rule 23 - Order 43, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR648; 2009(1)BomCR130

Advocate for Respondent : S.P. Kshirsagar, Adv. for respondent No. 1 and ;Ashirgade, Adv. for respondent Nos. 2 and 3

Dharmadhikari B.P., J.1. By this appeal against order filed under provisions of Order 43, Rule 1(u) of the Civil Procedure Code, the appellant-original defendant No. 3 in Regular Civil Appeal No. 584 of 2007, challenges the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2005

Anant Balaji Todkar and ors. Vs. Smt. Vijaya Ramkrishna Girde and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-31-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Limitation Act - Sections 3 and 5; Madras General Sales Tax Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11 - Order 21, Rules 35, 36, 97, 99, 101, 103 and 104 - Order 22, Rule 5; Constitution of India - Article 372; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : 2006(2)BomCR880; 2005(4)MhLj90

Advocate for Respondent : S.P. Kshirsagar, Adv. in W.P. No. 4277 of 2004 and W.P. No. (Stamp) 28701 of 2004 and ;S.V. Purohit, Adv. in W.P. No. 87 of 2005

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Writ Petition 4277 of 2004 is filed by decree holders Ananta and others against the respondent Vijaya and her husband Ramakrishna challenging the order dated 23-7-2004 passed by 15th Ad-hoc Additional District Judge,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2003

Ganu S/O Kisna Buradkar Vs. Manik S/O Kisna Buradkar and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-22-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 8, Rule 6A

Reported in : 2003(4)ALLMR239; 2003(5)BomCR751; 2003(3)MhLj218

Advocate for Respondent : S.P. Kshirsagar, Adv.

R.G. Deshpande, J.1. Rule, returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, matter is taken up for hearing. 2. The petitioner, who is a plaintiff, has initiated a suit for declaration and injunction against the present...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 2006

Sukhdeo Ambuji Bahakar and ors. Vs. Savita Gajanan Kalne

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-18-2006

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2007(1)BomCR515; 2006(4)MhLj384

Advocate for Respondent : S.P. Kshirsagar and ;S.D. Khati, Advs.

ORDERA.H. Joshi, J.1. Heard Advocate Mr. V.M. Deshpande for the appellants and Advocate Mr. S.P. Kshirsagar with Advocate Mr. S.D. Khati for the respondent.2. In support of the appeal, learned Advocate Mr. Deshpande has pressed two...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 2005

Shri Y.J. Patki, Prorietor of Patki and Dadarkar, Chartered Architects ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-25-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 25F, 32C(2) and 33C(2); Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Apprentices Act; Payment of Bonus Act

Reported in : [2005(107)FLR1151]; (2006)ILLJ677Bom

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjay Kshirsagar, Adv. for Respondent No. 1

B.H. Marlapalle, J.1. Being aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Judge of the Labour Court at Pune dated 6th December 1995 allowing an application filed under section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial