Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: krishnan venugopal and · Page 1 of about 111 results (0.101 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 10 2008

Mauri Yeast India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-10-2008

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act - Sections 3A(1); Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969; Kerala General Sales Tax Act; Central Sales Tax Act; Evidence Act - Sections 101; Interpretative Rules - Rule 3

Reported in : 2008(225)ELT321(SC); JT2008(13)SC657; 2008(6)SCALE241; (2008)5SCC680; (2008)14VST259(SC); 2008AIRSCW2837; 2008(3)Supreme9

Advocate for Respondent : Krishnan Venugopal, ; Manoj Kumar Dwivedi, ; Vibha Dwivedi

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Interpretation of an Entry in the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 is in question in these appeals which arise out of a judgment and order dated 16th April, 2007 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2012

P.A.Mohammed Riyas Vs. M.K.Raghavan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-27-2012

Subject : Civil

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 81, 100, 101, 123, 123(4), 83(1)(C); Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - Rule 94-A; Code Of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6 Rule 15(4)

ALTAMAS KABIR, J.1. The appellant herein, who contested the parliamentary elections held on 16th April, 2009 for the No.05 - Kozhikode Constituency of the Lok Sabha, challenged the election of the Respondent, Shri M.K. Raghavan, who...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2009

Citation Infowares Limited Vs. Equinox Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-20-2009

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(2), 11, 11(5) and 34; Companies Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : 2009(3)AWC2683(SC); JT2009(8)SC316; (2009)7SCC220; 2009(5)LC2066(SC); MANU/SC/0836/2009

Advocate for Respondent : Krishnan Venugopal, Sr. Adv., ; Pragyan Pradip Sharma, ; Ka

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. This is an application under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The applicant M/s Citation Infowares Ltd. is a company registered under the Companies Act carrying on business in United...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 05 2009

Jindal Vijayanagar Steels Ltd., Now Known as Jsw Steel Ltd. Rep. by It ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-05-2009

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 4, 5, 5(1), 10, 10(3), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 11(3), 11(4), 11(5), 13, 17A, 17(4), 18 and 30; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3(1); Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981; Constitution of India (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 4; Sick Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1974 - Sections 39; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 19, 21, 31, 31B, 31C, 39, 47, 48A, 51A, 226 and 227; Constitution of India (Thirty-ninth Amendment) Act, 1975 - Article 31B; Constitution of India (Twent

Reported in : 2009(4)KCCR2566(D.B)

Advocate for Respondent : Krishnan Venugopal, Sr. Adv., ;M.M. Swamy, Adv. for R.1, ;Udaya Holla, Adv. General, ;B. Veerappa, Addl. Govt. Adv. for R.2 and R.3 and ;Aravind Kumar, Asst. Solicitor General for R.4 in W.A. Nos. 502

I. CORE ISSUES1. The above batch of writ appeals are directed against the order dated 7th August, 2008 made in writ petition No. 21608 of 2005, raising the following core issues for our consideration:(i) Whether it...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2001

Manocha Construction Company (Now Dissolved) Through Partner, R.S. Man ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-16-2001

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1982 - Sections 19

Reported in : AIR2001SC1230; JT2001(3)SC65; 2001(2)SCALE81; (2001)3SCC401

Advocate for Respondent : Krishnan Venugopal, ; Uday Tiwary, ; Satish Agnihotri, a

K.G. Balakrishnan, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Civil Revision No. 296 of 1992 on 30th January,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2009

P.K. Palanisamy Vs. N. Arumugham and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-23-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Court Fees' Act, 1870 - Sections 4; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 54; Army Act - Sections 20 and 22; Limitation Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115, 148, 149 and 151 - Order 7, Rule 11; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2010(1)AWC498(SC); JT2009(10)SC79; 2010(2)MhLJ84(SC); (2009)8MLJ123(SC); 2009(10)SCALE79; (2009)9SCC173

Advocate for Respondent : Krishnan Venugopal, Sr. Adv., ; R. Anand Padmanabhan and ; Pr

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 28th November, 2008 passed by a learned single judge of the High Court of Judicature at Madras whereby and whereunder a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 2009

State Through Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. Parmeshwaran Subrama ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-11-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 19 and 120B; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 6 and 6(1); Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 52(3); Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections 8(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B

Reported in : AIR2010SC584; 2009(57)BLJR3150; 2009(242)ELT162(SC); JT2009(12)SC458; 2009(12)SCALE410; (2009)9SCC729; 2009(10)LC4665(SC); 2009(5)LHSC3216; 2009(6)Scale792

Advocate for Respondent : Krishnan Venugopal, Sr. Adv., ; Santosh Kumar, ; Davesh Sin

B. Sudershan Reddy, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal, which has come before us by special leave, is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Bombay at Goa dated 23.11.2006 in Criminal Revision Application No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 2021

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-14-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (Civil) No.502 of 2021 Madras Bar Association .... Petitioner(s) Versus Union of India & Another …. Respondent (s) JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.1. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 2018

Navtej Singh Johar Vs. Union of India Ministry of Law and Justice Secr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-06-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.76 OF2016NAVTEJ SINGH JOHAR & ORS. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA THR. SECRETARY MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE WITH …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) WRIT PETITION...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2021

Municipal Corporation Of Gr. Mumbai Vs. Ankita Sinha

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-07-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

[REPORTABLE]. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 12122-12123 OF2018MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI … APPELLANT(S) VERSUS ANKITA SINHA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.86/2019 CIVIL APPEAL No.5902/2019 CIVIL APPEAL...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial