Advanced Search Results

Mohammad Umar Son of Ilahi Bux Vs. the Collector/District Magistrate,

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 97, 173A, 291, 293 and 294; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act - Sections 225, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283 and 286; Uttar Pradesh Money Recovery Act - Sections 3; Uttar Pradesh Town Area Act - Sections 21; Uttar Pradesh Kshettra Panchayats and Zila Panchayats Adhiniyam, 1961 - Sections 2(6), 2(11), 5, 5(1), 17, 17(1), 120(3), 121, 123, 142 to 145, 146, 147, 148, 151 to 157, 158, 159, 161 and 239(1); Indian Contract Act - Sections 10; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Laws (Amendment) Act, 1994; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 387 and 504; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 243H and 243X

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2412

Advocate for Respondent : K.M. Srivastava, ;Krishna Mohan and ;C.K. Parekh, Advs.

Saroj Bala, J.1. All these bunch cases involving common question of law are being decided together.2. The facts of each writ petition are as hereunder:1. Writ Petition No. 31782 of 19923. The order impugned in the...

Dr. D. Bharathi Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Its Principal Secr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156(3), 321 and 494; Specific Relief Act - Sections 31; Schedule Castes, Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 139, 199, 405, 406, 420, 463, 465, 468 and 471; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2009(3)ALT209

Advocate for Respondent : G.P. for Home for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and ;G.P. for Revenue for Respondent No. 4, ;T. Bali Reddy, Sr. Counsel for Respondent Nos. 6 to 8 for ;K. Suresh Reddy, Adv. for Respondent No. 6, ;T. Venkata

ORDERGoda Raghuram, J.1. The sequence of relevant facts:The petitioner lodged a private complaint against the respondents 6 to 8 and others before the X Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad. The complaint was forwarded to the Gopalapuram Police Station,...

Mohan Lal and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; ;Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13

Reported in : 2001CriLJ2867; I(2001)DMC722

Advocate for Respondent : R.S. Parihar, A.G.A.

S.K. Agarwal, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicants and learned AGA.2. 1 have perused the annexures filed along with the affidavit filed in support of the application as well as counter-affidavit and the judgment delivered...

Union of India Vs. Chitra Srinivasan Irs and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Kunal Verma, Adv.

1. The petitioner, Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, has challenged the order dated 31.05.2010 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A. No. 606/2010 titled...

A. B. K. Prasad Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ElectionCriminal

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 135, 136 and 136(1) ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173(2); Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Code, 1974 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 23, 24, 25, 379, 411 and 505; Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961 - Rules 46 and 93; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1) and 226

Reported in : AIR1997AP357; 1997(2)ALD(Cri)174

Advocate for Respondent : Addl. Advocate General and Govt. Pleader for Home

ORDERP. S. Mishra, C. J. 1. Editor of a language newspaper has moved the instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India questioning the action of the Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District and the...

Ramlal Hazarimal Vs. Hiralal Ramlal and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1953CriLJ1704

ORDERNevaskar, J.1. Accused Hiralal Ramlal was prosecuted before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sitamau for a charge under Section 409, Penal Code and was acquitted on 25.9.50. During the Police investigation the petitioner who is the father of...

Patangy Someswara Rao and anr. Vs. Golurui Tata Reddy (Died) and Three ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilTenancy

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act - Sections 22

Reported in : 2005(5)ALD286

Advocate for Respondent : M. Krishna Mohan Rao, Adv.

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J. 1. The petitioners in R.C.C. No. 10 of 1995 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-Rent Controller, Vizianagaram, filed the present Civil Revision Petition under Section 22 of Andhra Pradesh Building...

Uddagiri Chalama Raju and anr. Vs. Uddagiri Subba Rao (Died) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : PropertyFamily

Acts : Hindu Law

Reported in : 1994(2)ALT522

Advocate for Respondent : M. Krishna Mohan, Adv.

ORDERY. Bhaskar Rao, J.1. The appellants are the plaintiffs and the respondents are the defendants in the suit. For the sake of convenience, they are referred to as arrayed in the suit.2. The facts of the...

Amara Satyanarayana Vs. Majeti (Amara) Srinivasa Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 5, 5(2), 10 and 10(4); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 13; Hindu Marriage Act; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 57 and 118

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD423; 2008(2)ALT410

Advocate for Respondent : M. Krishna Mohan Rao, Adv.

P.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Srinivas Emani, Counsel representing the appellant and Sri M. Krishna Mohan Rao, the learned Counsel representing the respondent.2. This Court on 1.4.1999 made the following order:Admit in view of the substantial questions...

Dinesh and ors. Vs. Board of Revenue and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80 and 80(2) - Order 23, Rule 1; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 229B, 333, 333(1) and 333(2)

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1144

Advocate for Respondent : Krishna Mohan, Adv.

Ashok Bhushan, J. 1. Heard Sri A.C. Tewari, counsel for the petitioner and Shri Krishna Mohan, counsel appearing for contesting respondent Nos. 2 to 7.2. Counter and rejoinder-affidavit have been exchanged and with the consent of...