Advanced Search Results

Dr. Smt. Vijaya Kothalkar Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2001(5)MPHT295; 2001(3)MPLJ469

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Kemkar, Govt. Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner is hereby assailing the correctness, propriety and illegality of the judgment and order passed by the M.P. State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur (hereinafter referred to as 'SAT' for convenience) in the matter of Original...

Municipal Council Vs. M.P. State Road Transport Corporation

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Acts : Indian Contract Act - Sections 70

Reported in : 1991(0)MPLJ910

Advocate for Respondent : Kemkar, Adv.

A.G. Qureshi, J.1. This is a first appeal Under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree passed by the District Judge, Rajgarh in C. S. No. 4-B of 1979 dated...

Surendra Singh Vs. M.P.S.R.T.C. and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : 1(2001)ACC41

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S.S. Kemkar

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. Claimant, a victim of accident and suffered injuries is dissatisfied with what is awarded to him by the Claims Tribunal. The Claims Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs. 2,000/-. The impugned award...

Padmabai and ors. Vs. Madhya Pradesh State Road Trans. Corpn. and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Reported in : II(1999)ACC281; 2001ACJ785

Advocate for Respondent : Kemkar, Adv.

Shambhoo Singh, J. 1. This appeal has been filed by the claimants against the award dated 28.4.94 passed by Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Mandleshwar (West Nimar) in Claim Case No. 55 of 1992 whereby compensation...

Subhash and Company Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2001(3)MPLJ634; [2002]125STC460(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Kemkar, Government Adv.

>J.G. Chitre, J.1. A small point for adjudication arises and for avoiding the delay in initiating the proceedings against the appellant for which the respondents issued notices, this appeal is being heard finally at motion hearing...

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Lalu and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : III(2002)ACC599

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S.S. Kemkar

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. The decision rendered in this appeal shall also decide the other connected Misc. Appeal No. 894/1998, as both these appeals arise out of the same impugned award and in fact both these appeals...

Vilas Vs. Madhya Pradesh State Road Trans. Corpn. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2003ACJ1234

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Kemkar and ;M.L. Dhupar, Advs.

Bhawani Singh, C.J. 1. This appeal is directed against the award of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Mandleshwar in Claim Case No. 10 of 1994 dated 17.11.97.2. Accident took place on 17.4.1989. Two vehicles truck No. CPU...

Ramesh Mavi Vs. Managing Director, M.P.S.R.T.C. and 2 ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : II(2002)ACC69

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Kemkar

Shambhoo Singh, J.1. This appeal is directed by the claimant against the award dated 18.2.1997 passed by the First Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mandsaur, in Claim Case No. 91/1995.2. The claimant filed Claim Case No....

Man Industries (India) Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2003(2)MPHT367

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Kemkar, Govt. Adv. for Respondent No. 1, ;C.M. Nair, Adv. for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, ;G.M. Chafekar, Sr. Adv. and ;D.S. Kale, Adv. for Respondent No. 4

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. The short question that arises for consideration in this writ is, whether respondent Nos. 2 and 3 were justified in holding that petitioner was not eligible for submitting tender pursuant to Notice Inviting...

Mani Vs. Sub-divisional Forest Officer-cum-authorised Officer and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Van Upaj (Vyapar Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1969 - Sections 15(6) and 19(1)

Reported in : 2000(4)MPHT105

Advocate for Respondent : S. Kemkar, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2

ORDERJ.G. Chitre, J.1. Heard Shri Saraf at length. Perused the order which is being assailed by this L.F.A. Shri Saraf pointed out that learned Single Judge has not property considered the provisions of Section 15(6) of...