Advanced Search Results
Dr. Smt. Vijaya Kothalkar Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Jun-27-2001
Service
Constitution of India - Article 227
2001(5)MPHT295; 2001(3)MPLJ469
S.S. Kemkar, Govt. Adv.
ORDER1. The petitioner is hereby assailing the correctness, propriety and illegality of the judgment and order passed by the M.P. State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur (hereinafter referred to as 'SAT' for convenience) in the matter of Original...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunicipal Council Vs. M.P. State Road Transport Corporation
Madhya Pradesh
Dec-14-1990
Contract
Indian Contract Act - Sections 70
1991(0)MPLJ910
Kemkar, Adv.
A.G. Qureshi, J.1. This is a first appeal Under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree passed by the District Judge, Rajgarh in C. S. No. 4-B of 1979 dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPadmabai and ors. Vs. Madhya Pradesh State Road Trans. Corpn. and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
May-04-1999
Civil
II(1999)ACC281; 2001ACJ785
Kemkar, Adv.
Shambhoo Singh, J. 1. This appeal has been filed by the claimants against the award dated 28.4.94 passed by Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Mandleshwar (West Nimar) in Claim Case No. 55 of 1992 whereby compensation...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Subhash and Company Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-18-2001
Sales Tax
Constitution of India - Article 226
2001(3)MPLJ634; [2002]125STC460(MP)
S.S. Kemkar, Government Adv.
>J.G. Chitre, J.1. A small point for adjudication arises and for avoiding the delay in initiating the proceedings against the appellant for which the respondents issued notices, this appeal is being heard finally at motion hearing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMan Industries (India) Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-06-2003
Constitution
2003(2)MPHT367
S.S. Kemkar, Govt. Adv. for Respondent No. 1, ;C.M. Nair, Adv. for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, ;G.M. Chafekar, Sr. Adv. and ;D.S. Kale, Adv. for Respondent No. 4
ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. The short question that arises for consideration in this writ is, whether respondent Nos. 2 and 3 were justified in holding that petitioner was not eligible for submitting tender pursuant to Notice Inviting...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVilas Vs. Madhya Pradesh State Road Trans. Corpn. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-11-2001
Motor Vehicles
2003ACJ1234
S.S. Kemkar and ;M.L. Dhupar, Advs.
Bhawani Singh, C.J. 1. This appeal is directed against the award of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Mandleshwar in Claim Case No. 10 of 1994 dated 17.11.97.2. Accident took place on 17.4.1989. Two vehicles truck No. CPU...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMani Vs. Sub-divisional Forest Officer-cum-authorised Officer and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-07-2000
Civil
Madhya Pradesh Van Upaj (Vyapar Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1969 - Sections 15(6) and 19(1)
2000(4)MPHT105
S. Kemkar, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2
ORDERJ.G. Chitre, J.1. Heard Shri Saraf at length. Perused the order which is being assailed by this L.F.A. Shri Saraf pointed out that learned Single Judge has not property considered the provisions of Section 15(6) of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarichand Vs. Dharampal Singh Baba and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Oct-01-2003
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 11
2004(1)MPHT472
Ravish Agrawal, Sr. Adv. and ;Pranay Verma, Adv. for Responsent Nos. 1 and 2
ORDERShantanu Kemkar, J. 1. Heard Shri A.D. Deoras, learned Counsel for the appellant and Shri Ravish Agrawal, learned Senior Counsel with Shri Pranay Verma, Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 on LA. No. 2579/2003...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManakchand Ruthia Vs. Rajendra Kumar Agrawal and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Dec-04-2007
Civil
2008(2)MPHT64
ORDERShantanu Kemkar, J.1. Heard learned Senior Counsel on the question of admission. This order shall also govern the disposal of the Writ Petition No. 16255/2003, Manakchand Ruthia v. Rajendra Kumar Agrawal and Anr.2. Feeling aggrieved by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBachchanram Agrahari Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-13-2006
Service
2006(3)MPLJ568
P.S. Nair, Learned Sr. Counsel and ;Jashmeet Chana, learned Counsel
ORDERShantanu Kemkar, J.1. Shri Z.M. Shah, learned Counsel for the petitioner.2. Shri P.S. Nair, learned Senior Counsel with Ms. Jashmeet Chana, learned Counsel for the respondents.3. The petitioner is working on the post of Deputy Chief...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »