Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: kemkar · Page 1 of about 162 results (0.072 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 27 2001

Dr. Smt. Vijaya Kothalkar Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-27-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2001(5)MPHT295; 2001(3)MPLJ469

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Kemkar, Govt. Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner is hereby assailing the correctness, propriety and illegality of the judgment and order passed by the M.P. State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur (hereinafter referred to as 'SAT' for convenience) in the matter of Original...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 1990

Municipal Council Vs. M.P. State Road Transport Corporation

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-14-1990

Subject : Contract

Acts : Indian Contract Act - Sections 70

Reported in : 1991(0)MPLJ910

Advocate for Respondent : Kemkar, Adv.

A.G. Qureshi, J.1. This is a first appeal Under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree passed by the District Judge, Rajgarh in C. S. No. 4-B of 1979 dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 1999

Padmabai and ors. Vs. Madhya Pradesh State Road Trans. Corpn. and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-04-1999

Subject : Civil

Reported in : II(1999)ACC281; 2001ACJ785

Advocate for Respondent : Kemkar, Adv.

Shambhoo Singh, J. 1. This appeal has been filed by the claimants against the award dated 28.4.94 passed by Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Mandleshwar (West Nimar) in Claim Case No. 55 of 1992 whereby compensation...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 18 2001

Subhash and Company Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-18-2001

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2001(3)MPLJ634; [2002]125STC460(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Kemkar, Government Adv.

>J.G. Chitre, J.1. A small point for adjudication arises and for avoiding the delay in initiating the proceedings against the appellant for which the respondents issued notices, this appeal is being heard finally at motion hearing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2003

Man Industries (India) Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-06-2003

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2003(2)MPHT367

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Kemkar, Govt. Adv. for Respondent No. 1, ;C.M. Nair, Adv. for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, ;G.M. Chafekar, Sr. Adv. and ;D.S. Kale, Adv. for Respondent No. 4

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. The short question that arises for consideration in this writ is, whether respondent Nos. 2 and 3 were justified in holding that petitioner was not eligible for submitting tender pursuant to Notice Inviting...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2001

Vilas Vs. Madhya Pradesh State Road Trans. Corpn. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-11-2001

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2003ACJ1234

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Kemkar and ;M.L. Dhupar, Advs.

Bhawani Singh, C.J. 1. This appeal is directed against the award of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Mandleshwar in Claim Case No. 10 of 1994 dated 17.11.97.2. Accident took place on 17.4.1989. Two vehicles truck No. CPU...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 2000

Mani Vs. Sub-divisional Forest Officer-cum-authorised Officer and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-07-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Van Upaj (Vyapar Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1969 - Sections 15(6) and 19(1)

Reported in : 2000(4)MPHT105

Advocate for Respondent : S. Kemkar, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2

ORDERJ.G. Chitre, J.1. Heard Shri Saraf at length. Perused the order which is being assailed by this L.F.A. Shri Saraf pointed out that learned Single Judge has not property considered the provisions of Section 15(6) of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 2003

Harichand Vs. Dharampal Singh Baba and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-01-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 11

Reported in : 2004(1)MPHT472

Advocate for Respondent : Ravish Agrawal, Sr. Adv. and ;Pranay Verma, Adv. for Responsent Nos. 1 and 2

ORDERShantanu Kemkar, J. 1. Heard Shri A.D. Deoras, learned Counsel for the appellant and Shri Ravish Agrawal, learned Senior Counsel with Shri Pranay Verma, Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 on LA. No. 2579/2003...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 2007

Manakchand Ruthia Vs. Rajendra Kumar Agrawal and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-04-2007

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2008(2)MPHT64

ORDERShantanu Kemkar, J.1. Heard learned Senior Counsel on the question of admission. This order shall also govern the disposal of the Writ Petition No. 16255/2003, Manakchand Ruthia v. Rajendra Kumar Agrawal and Anr.2. Feeling aggrieved by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2006

Bachchanram Agrahari Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-13-2006

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2006(3)MPLJ568

Advocate for Respondent : P.S. Nair, Learned Sr. Counsel and ;Jashmeet Chana, learned Counsel

ORDERShantanu Kemkar, J.1. Shri Z.M. Shah, learned Counsel for the petitioner.2. Shri P.S. Nair, learned Senior Counsel with Ms. Jashmeet Chana, learned Counsel for the respondents.3. The petitioner is working on the post of Deputy Chief...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial