Advanced Search Results

V. Subramaniam Vs. the Central Bank of India Rep. by Its Managing Dire ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2003)IIILLJ146Mad

Advocate for Respondent : Karthik, for T.S. Gopalan & Co.

ORDERE. Padmanabhan, J.1. The writ petitioner, a retired officer of the respondent Bank, has prayed for the issue of a writ of declaration declaring Regulation No. 22 of The Central Bank of India Employees Pension Regulation,...

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd Vs. Ms Subhiksha Trading Services.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 138; Companies Act, 1956. - Sections 433(e), (f),434 (i) (a), 439(1)(b), 237, 450(2),; Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) - Section 195

Petition filed under Sections 433(e) & (f) r/w 434 (i) (a) and 439(1)(b) and 237 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking to wind up the Respondent Company namely M/s Subhiksha Trading Services Limited uner the provisions...

TuticorIn Vegetable Marketing Co. (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer and ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 119, 119(2), 234A, 234B and 234C

Reported in : [2000]243ITR202(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : C.V. Rajan, Adv.

K. Sampath, J.1. The petitioner prays for a declaration that the provisions of Sections 234B and 234C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, are unconstitutional, arbitrary, null and void.2. The allegations necessary for the disposal of the...

Alitalia Linee Aeree Italiane, S.P.A. Rep. by Its Deputy Administrativ ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishment Act - Sections 14, 41, 41(1) and 41(2); Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishment Rules - Rule 9 and 9(1); Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 11A

Reported in : 2003(3)CTC275; (2003)IIILLJ453Mad; (2003)2MLJ445

Advocate for Respondent : Karthik, Adv. for ;D. Venkatesan, Adv.

V.S. Sirpurkar, J. 1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned single Judge whereby the learned Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant. Appellant/petitioner is a corporate body, registered...

V. Parameswara Iyer Vs. Canara Bank

Court : Chennai

Subject : BankingCompany

Reported in : [2000]101CompCas424(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : V. Karthik, Adv. for;T.S. Gopalan and P. Ibrahim Kalibullah, Advs.

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the order of the first respondent confirming the order of the second respondent imposing punishment of censure and ordering recovery of a sum of Rs....

Subhiksha Trading Services Ltd. Vs. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company Law

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 391, 394; Company Court Rules - Rule 21

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.H.Karthik Seshadri, Adv.

This application is filed by the respondent to dismiss C.P.No.68 of 2009. 2. C.P.No.68 of 2009 was filed by the respondent in this application to pass an order of winding up of the applicant company. Alongwith...

The Chairman, Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti, Ministry of Hrd, Vs. Dr. T. M ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Education Code - Schedule - Article 81; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2008)5MLJ261

Advocate for Respondent : Vijay Narayan, SC for ;Karthik Mukundan, GA

ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. Aggrieved by the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 09.6.2005 made in O.A. No. 1027 of 2004, the petitioners, who are the Chairman, Commissioner of the Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti [for short,...

Padmanabhan A. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Labour and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act - Sections 4(6) and 5A; Companies Act - Sections 385(1)(C); Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 17B; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : (2009)IIILLJ414Mad; (2009)2MLJ560

Advocate for Respondent : N. Senthilkumar, AGP, ;V. Karthik, Adv. for ;T.G. Gopalan and Co.

ORDERR. Banumathi, J.1. Petitioner seeks writ of certiorarified mandamus to quash the orders of the 1st respondent in P.G.A. No. 38/2005 on December 26, 2005 and to direct the 2nd respondent to pay a sum of...

N. Vidhyasagar Vs. the Deputy Manager, Syndicate Bank

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 73; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 409

Reported in : (2007)6MLJ1246

Advocate for Respondent : T. Karthik, Adv. for T.S. Gopalan & Co.

S. Tamilvanan, J.1. This writ appeal is directed against the order, dated 20.06.2003, made in W.P. No. 1778/95 by the learned single judge, dismissing the writ petition, whereby the appellant herein had challenged the charge memo,...

P. Muthusamy Vs. Tamilnadu Cements Corporation Limited Rep. by Its Cha ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Rules - Rule 2.22

Reported in : (2006)4MLJ504

Advocate for Respondent : Karthik, Adv. for T.S. Gopalan & Co. for Respondent-1

P. Sathasivam, J.1. In W.P. No.18952 of 2003, the petitioner challenges the charge memo, dated 16.09.2002, issued by the 1st respondent/Tamilnadu Cements Corporation Limited (TANCEM), and Order dated 30.06.2003, and seeks to quash the same insofar...