Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: kapil sibal and · Page 1 of about 614 results (0.181 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 17 1992

Mithilesh Kumar Sinha and Kaka Joginder Singh Alias Dharati Pakad Vs. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-17-1992

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952 - Sections 5B(1), 13, 14A, 17 and 18(1); Supreme Court Rules, 1966 - Order 23, Rule 6 - Order 39, Rules 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 20 and 34; Constitution of India - Article 14, 38, 21(3), 52, 53, 54, 55, 58(3), 60, 66, 71(3), 79, 84 and 102; Constitutional Eleventh Amendment Act, 1961; Anti Defection Act; Representation of the People Act, 1950 - Sections 12 and 16; Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections (Amendment) Act, 1977; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 171C

Reported in : AIR1993SC20; JT1992(5)SC479; 1992(2)SCALE566; 1993Supp(4)SCC386; [1992]Supp1SCR651

Advocate for Respondent : G. Ramaswamy, ; Attorney General, ; Kapil Sibal, ;

ORDERJ.S. Verma, J.1. Both these election petitions filed under Section 14 of the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') challenge the election of Dr. Shanker Dayal Sharma, as the ninth...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 18 1994

State of T.N. and ors. Vs. V.S. Balakrishnan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-18-1994

Subject : Service

Reported in : JT1994(5)SC96; (1995)ILLJ1335SC; 1994(3)SCALE345; 1994Supp(3)SCC204; [1994]Supp1SCR739; (1994)3UPLBEC1871

Advocate for Respondent : Kapil Sibal, ; P. Chidambram and ; Arun Jaitley, Senior Ad

Kuldip Singh, J.1. The Tamil Nadu Government decided in March 1972 to form a government company with a view to take over the entire business activity of the Diary Development Department of the State Government. As...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 1989

State of Punjab Vs. Sukhpal Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-06-1989

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 22, 22(5), 32, 136 and 226; National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3(2), 8(1), 9, 10, 11, 11(2), 12(2) and 14A; National Security (Amendment) Act, 1984; National Security (Amendment) Act, 1987; National Security (Amendment) Act, 1988

Reported in : AIR1990SC231; 1990CriLJ584; JT1989(4)SC95; 1989(2)SCALE731; (1990)1SCC35; [1989]Supp1SCR420

Advocate for Respondent : Kapil Sibal, ; H.S. Randhwa and ; Kamini Jaiswal, Advs.

K.N. Saikia, J.1. Special leave granted. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2 This State's appeal is from the Judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dated 31.7.1989 passed in Criminal Writ Petition No. 2365...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 14 1996

Registrar General, High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore Vs. M. Gautam Ma ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-14-1996

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1996CriLJ3035; ILR1996KAR1233; 1996(2)KarLJ183

Advocate for Respondent : Kapil Sibal, Sr. Counsel for ;C.V. Nagesh

ORDER1. In the issue of the Indian Express daily dated 15-7-1995, an article appeared under the caption 'Legal Hurdles'. The relevant portions of the said article, as published, read as under :- 'Barely had the Bangalore...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 1992

Krishna Swami Vs. Union of India and Anotherwithraj Kanwar V. Union of ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-27-1992

Subject : Constitution Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 22(1), 32, 93, 94, 124(4), 131, 136, 141, 142, 145(3), 217(1)(C) and 226; Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 - Sections 3(2) and 4(2); Judges (Enquiry) Rules, 1969 - Rules 6, 7, 9 and 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 114 and 151 - Order 47, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1993SC1407; JT1992(5)SC92; 1992(1)SCALE484; (1992)4SCC605; [1992]Supp1SCR53

ORDERJ.S. Verma, J.1. Both these writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution were heard together and are disposed of by this common judgment since they involve for decision substantially the same points. In Writ Petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 1994

Public Union for Civil Liberties and ors. Vs. State of T.N. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-13-1994

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1995)ILLJ259SC; (1994)5SCC116

ORDERJ.S. Verma, J.1. We have heard Mr Kapil Sibal, Senior Advocate who appears at our request as amicus curiae in this matter, as well as the other learned Counsel appearing in this case. It does not...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 13 2000

Nisha Vs. Punjab National Bank

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-13-2000

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 96; Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 - Sections 15

Reported in : AIR2000Delhi439

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Y.P. Chandna, Adv.

ORDERA.K. Sikri, J.1. Appellant is the owner/landlady of the suit property bearing No. XVI 10203, Karol Bagh, Padam Singh Road, New Delhi. The building in which the suit premises is situate is known as 'Jamuna House'....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 2006

G. Narasimha Murthy Vs. District Collector and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-06-2006

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 28, 29, 29(2), 35, 35(1), 35(2) and 36; Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 22, 22(1), 22(3); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123 and 124; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 - Sections 18; State Bank of India Act, 1955 - Sections 43 and 43(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 59, 80, 92, 113, 115 and 122 - Order 47; Conditions of Service Order, 1979; Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1989 - Rules 17, 17(2), 18 and 19; Central Hindi Directorate (Class III and Class IV) Posts Recruitment Rules, 1961 - Rules 4, 6, 6(1) and 7; Central Administrative Tribunal Procedure Rules, 1987 - Rules 15, 16 and 17; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16(1), 26, 30,

Reported in : 2006(3)ALD370; 2006(3)ALT433

Advocate for Respondent : Government Pleader for Services II, Assistant Solicitor General

P.S. Narayana, J.1. The question of the power of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal (in short hereinafter referred to as 'A.P.A.T.') to condone the delay beyond the period specified under Rule 17 of the Andhra Pradesh...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 1992

State of Himachal Pradesh and Another Vs. Kailash Chand Mahajan and Ot ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-20-1992

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 3(1), 5, 8, 10 and 78; Constitution of India - Articles 5(2), 14, 16, 19, 21, 101(3), 102, 136, 190(3), 191, 213, 224, 226 and 254; Administrative Tribunals Act - Sections 8; Osmania University Act, 1959 - Sections 13(1); Constitution of India - Articles 309 and 311; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 14 and 16; Himachal Pradesh Act, 1990 - Sections 9 and 10; Himachal Pradesh Ordinance Rules - Rules 2/90, 3 and 4; Osmania University (Amendment) Act, 1966 - Sections 12(1);

Reported in : AIR1992SC1277; JT1992(2)SC144; 1992LabIC1371; 1992(1)SCALE454; 1992Supp(2)SCC351; [1992]1SCR917

ORDERS. Mohan, J.1. The facts relating to the Civil Appeal are as under:-2. The first respondent (Mr. Kailash Chand Mahajan) retired from the post of Chief Engineer from the State of Punjab. On 24.7.81, he was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 1993

Ferro Alloys Corpn. Ltd. Vs. A.P. State Electricity Board and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-15-1993

Subject : ElectricityConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14 and 226; Interest Act, 1978 - Sections 4(2); Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2(4) and 24; Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rule 27; Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975; Orissa State Electricity Board General Conditions of Supply Regulations, 1981 - Regulations 7 and 20; Electricity Act, 1947 - Sections 57(2) and 71

Reported in : AIR1993SC2005; JT1993(3)SC82; 1993(2)SCALE593; 1993Supp(4)SCC136; [1993]3SCR199

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. M.P.Jha

ORDERS. Mohan, J.1. Leave granted.2. These civil appeals are directed against the judgment of the Division Bench of Andhra Pradesh High Court reported in Southern Steel Ltd. v. A.P. State Electricity Board, Hyderabad MR 1990 AP...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial